
Dan Brecher
Counsel
212-286-0747 dbrecher@sh-law.com
Counsel
212-286-0747 dbrecher@sh-law.comWhile everyone was waiting for the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to finalize its equity crowdfunding rules, many states took matters into their own hands. Now that the federal regulations are finally in place, it remains unclear what role intrastate crowdfunding will play.

In total, 28 states have now legalized some form of equity crowdfunding at the local level. Many more, including New Jersey, have proposed legislation that would allow entrepreneurs and small businesses to solicit financing from “everyday” investors, otherwise known as the “crowd.” Under these state laws, issuers can sell securities via the Internet to investors who reside in the same state, subject to certain caps. This is intended to facilitate small businesses in seeking relatively small amounts of capital to establish or grow their companies.
On the state level, Texas has emerged as a leader in crowdfunding. According to Texas Securities Commissioner John Morgan, the state’s crowdfunding law has generated $1.8 million in investments over the course of approximately 18 months. In total, 34 offerings have been made under the law, which allows non-accredited investors to invest up to $5,000 per year and allows businesses to raise up to $1 million from the crowd each year.
To further encourage the use of intrastate crowdfunding for smaller securities offerings, the Texas State Securities Board is considering an amendment that would permit a registered portal to handle investor funds if the funds are held in a segregated account when the maximum offering amount in a crowdfunding offering is $100,000 or less. As detailed in the crowdfunding rule proposal, portals must make certain disclosures to investors regarding the use of the segregated account and are responsible for the prudent processing, safeguarding, and accounting for funds entrusted to the portal by the investors and the issuer.
Given the relative scarcity of traditional funding as compared with earlier decades, crowdfunding presents a unique opportunity for entrepreneurs and start-ups to solicit capital directly from the public. However, despite the rapid adoption of state crowdfunding laws, entrepreneurs and investors have yet to fully buy into the new opportunity, with only 119 offerings having been made under the various states’ crowdfunding laws to date.
Going forward, it will be interesting to see if the finalization of the SEC rules will ultimately provide the “jumpstart” the equity crowdfunding industry needs. So far, less than 25 companies have taken advantage of equity crowdfunding under the JOBS Act regulations that took effect in May.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

IP infringement occurs when someone uses your intellectual property without your permission or beyond the scope of the permission you granted. Common examples of IP infringement include copying a product’s patented features or using a trademarked logo in a way that is likely to confuse consumers about the source or affiliation of goods or services. […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki

When facing public allegations of wrongdoing, companies should not let the speed of the public conversation dictate the speed of an investigation. An investigation designed to confirm a preferred narrative rather than establish the facts can create serious problems later, particularly if litigation, regulatory scrutiny, or employment claims follow. Key Takeaways When public allegations surface […]
Author: Sean M. Pena

For battery energy storage system (BESS) developers, securing equipment and site control is only part of the development equation. A project must also connect to the electric grid, and increasingly, BESS interconnection is one of the biggest sources of schedule, cost, and contractual risk. Key Takeaways This article is Part 3 of our Battery Storage […]
Author: Nicholas Wall

Director and officer liability increases sharply when a company is in financial distress. Decisions that would draw little attention in a healthy business can later be challenged by creditors, shareholders, bankruptcy trustees, and regulators as breaches of fiduciary duty, fraudulent transfers, or oversight failures. Understanding where that exposure comes from, and how to manage it, […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki

For developers pursuing battery energy storage system (BESS) projects, finding the right property is only the beginning. BESS site selection is as much a legal and transactional exercise as a real estate decision, with risk analysis central to the project’s ultimate success. Key Takeaways The core questions for BESS site selection in New York and […]
Author: Nicholas Wall

What should you expect when meeting a litigation attorney about a business dispute? You should expect to describe the dispute in your own words, hand over the most important documents, flag any deadlines or immediate threats, and leave with a clearer picture of the problem, what information is still needed, and the likely next steps. […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!