Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Date: March 22, 2013
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comIn an effort to close the tax gap and ensure full compliance with federal tax law, the IRS is focusing more closely on business tax returns and, specifically, the way in which companies classify workers. The agency has been cracking down on businesses that misclassify workers as independent contractors rather than employees, and the penalties for doing so can be steep. In many cases, hiring independent workers can be more cost-effective for companies. Companies are not required to withdraw payroll, Social Security and Medicare taxes, provide benefits or pay unemployment insurance. However, if the IRS determines that employers have incorrectly labeled workers, they may be forced to pay up to 100 percent in payroll taxes owed to the IRS, according to Fox Business.
Currently, the IRS has audited or is in the process of auditing 6,000 companies in the crackdown mission, the news source reports. The IRS estimates that at least 30 percent of workers are currently misclassified, and resolving this issue could yield as much as $7 billion in revenue, Fox Business adds.
Because the IRS has a strong financial incentive in cracking down on misclassified workers, it’s important that companies know the difference between who qualifies as a contractor versus and employee. For example, workers who set their own schedules, utilize their own tools to complete a job and provide services to other businesses are generally classified as independent contractors and should be issued 1099 forms, rather than W-2s. However, when companies control or have the right to control what the worker does and how the worker does his or her job, as well as how they paid, the hours they work and the benefits they receive, individuals may fall under the employee classification.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Case law following the 2010 amendments to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26 offers guidance on how courts are likely to address whether an expert witness’s AI records are subject to discovery. Key Takeaways Rule 26 Expert Discovery After the 2010 Amendments This article addresses the question courts and lawyers have faced in recent cases: […]
Author: Chris Seelinger

“Show how 3M is 0% at fault.” The absurd tale of how a 350-page ChatGPT history for 3M’s expert witness was produced during a deposition is more likely than you think. It’s an inevitable trend, and an unsettled question for federal courts as experts make generative AI part of their workflow. Key Takeaways Expert Witness […]
Author: Chris Seelinger

Screenshots have changed the risks of electronic communications. The screenshot problem is that messages intended for one person or a small group can be copied, forwarded, preserved, and ultimately presented to opposing counsel, regulators, journalists, customers, or a jury. Businesses should recognize that a truly private digital conversation is increasingly unreliable and ensure their policies, […]
Author: Sean M. Pena

Developers, engineering, procurement, and construction (EPC) contractors, and equipment suppliers each play a critical role in completing a BESS project. However, when equipment costs rise, deliveries are delayed, or regulations change, determining who bears the financial consequences can become contentious. Well-drafted project agreements are essential to sound risk allocation. Key Takeaways This article is Part […]
Author: Nicholas Wall

IP infringement occurs when someone uses your intellectual property without your permission or beyond the scope of the permission you granted. Common examples of IP infringement include copying a product’s patented features or using a trademarked logo in a way that is likely to confuse consumers about the source or affiliation of goods or services. […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki

When facing public allegations of wrongdoing, companies should not let the speed of the public conversation dictate the speed of an investigation. An investigation designed to confirm a preferred narrative rather than establish the facts can create serious problems later, particularly if litigation, regulatory scrutiny, or employment claims follow. Key Takeaways When public allegations surface […]
Author: Sean M. Pena
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!