Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC, LLCScarinci Hollenbeck, LLC, LLC

Firm Insights

Employers Must Use Updated Summary of Rights Under Fair Credit Reporting Act

Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC

Date: November 2, 2018

Key Contacts

Back

The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) Recently Published an Updated “Summary of Your Rights” Form

New York and New Jersey employers that conduct background checks should be sure to update their forms. Effective September 21, 2018, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) published an updated “Summary of Your Rights” form, which is required under the federal Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA).

Updated Summary of Rights Under Fair Credit Reporting Act
Photo courtesy of Lubomyr Myronyuk (Unsplash.com)

FCRA Notice and Disclosure Requirements

The FCRA, which applies when employers obtain background check information from third-party consumer reporting agencies, imposes strict notice and disclosure requirements on employers. It requires employers to notify job applicants and employees that they might use information in their consumer report for decisions related to their employment. The FCRA also requires employers to obtain written authorization to obtain the reports. This written disclosure must be in a stand-alone format separate from the job application and not contain any other content, although it may be contained with the authorization. 

When employers obtain an “investigative report,” a report based on personal interviews concerning a person’s character, general reputation, personal characteristics, and lifestyle, they must also tell the applicant or employee of his or her right to a description of the nature and scope of the investigation. In addition, employers are required to provide a copy of “A Summary of Your Rights Under the Fair Credit Reporting Act.”

When taking an adverse action, such as not hiring an applicant or terminating an employee, based on background information obtained through consumer reporting agency, the FCRA has additional requirements. Prior to taking the employment action, the employer must give the applicant or employee a notice that includes a copy of the consumer report relied upon in making the decision and a copy of “A Summary of Your Rights Under the Fair Credit Reporting Act.”

After employers take an adverse employment action, they must tell the applicant or employee (orally, in writing, or electronically): that he or she was rejected because of information in the report; the name, address, and phone number of the company that sold the report; that the company selling the report didn’t make the hiring decision, and can’t give specific reasons for it; that he or she has a right to dispute the accuracy or completeness of the report, and to get an additional free report from the reporting company within 60 days.

Amended Summary of Your Rights Form

The CFPB has revised the model form to reflect amendments to the FCRA. In May, Congress passed the Economic Growth, Regulatory Relief, and Consumer Protection Act, which requires nationwide consumer reporting agencies to provide “national security freezes” free of charge to consumers. The new legislation also mandates that whenever the FCRA requires a consumer to receive either the Summary of Consumer Rights or the Summary of Consumer Identity Theft Rights, a notice regarding the new security freeze right also must be included.

The Economic Growth, Regulatory Relief, and Consumer Protection Act also extends the minimum time that nationwide consumer reporting agencies must include an initial fraud alert in a consumer’s file from 90 days to one year. A fraud alert informs a prospective lender that a consumer may have been a victim of identity theft and requires that the lender take steps to verify the identity of anyone seeking credit in the consumer’s name.

The revised Summary of Your Rights form, which is available here, includes the above changes to the FCRA. To mitigate the impact of these changes on users of the existing model forms, the CFPB’s interim final rule provides that the Bureau will regard the use of the old model forms (dated November 14, 2012) to constitute compliance with the FCRA, so long as a separate page that contains the additional required information is provided in the same transmittal. 

Key Takeaway for New York and New Jersey Employers

The FCRA has consistently been a litigation trap for unwary businesses. Given that the improper use or non-use of the Summary of Rights form has been the subject of class-action lawsuits, employers should verify that they are using the correct version of the form or providing the new information now required under the FCRA.

No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC, LLC

Related Posts

See all
IP Infringement: What Steps Can You Take If You're Affected? post image

IP Infringement: What Steps Can You Take If You're Affected?

IP infringement occurs when someone uses your intellectual property without your permission or beyond the scope of the permission you granted. Common examples of IP infringement include copying a product’s patented features or using a trademarked logo in a way that is likely to confuse consumers about the source or affiliation of goods or services. […]

Author: Michael Mietlicki

Link to post with title - "IP Infringement: What Steps Can You Take If You're Affected?"
Public Allegations, Unfinished Investigation: What New Jersey Businesses Should Do Next post image

Public Allegations, Unfinished Investigation: What New Jersey Businesses Should Do Next

When facing public allegations of wrongdoing, companies should not let the speed of the public conversation dictate the speed of an investigation. An investigation designed to confirm a preferred narrative rather than establish the facts can create serious problems later, particularly if litigation, regulatory scrutiny, or employment claims follow. Key Takeaways When public allegations surface […]

Author: Sean M. Pena

Link to post with title - "Public Allegations, Unfinished Investigation: What New Jersey Businesses Should Do Next"
BESS Interconnection: Managing Grid, Cost, and Schedule Risk post image

BESS Interconnection: Managing Grid, Cost, and Schedule Risk

For battery energy storage system (BESS) developers, securing equipment and site control is only part of the development equation. A project must also connect to the electric grid, and increasingly, BESS interconnection is one of the biggest sources of schedule, cost, and contractual risk. Key Takeaways This article is Part 3 of our Battery Storage […]

Author: Nicholas Wall

Link to post with title - "BESS Interconnection: Managing Grid, Cost, and Schedule Risk"
Navigating Director and Officer Liability in Times of Financial Distress post image

Navigating Director and Officer Liability in Times of Financial Distress

Director and officer liability increases sharply when a company is in financial distress. Decisions that would draw little attention in a healthy business can later be challenged by creditors, shareholders, bankruptcy trustees, and regulators as breaches of fiduciary duty, fraudulent transfers, or oversight failures. Understanding where that exposure comes from, and how to manage it, […]

Author: Michael Mietlicki

Link to post with title - "Navigating Director and Officer Liability in Times of Financial Distress"
Before You Buy: Managing Real Estate and Permitting Risk for BESS Projects in New York and New Jersey post image

Before You Buy: Managing Real Estate and Permitting Risk for BESS Projects in New York and New Jersey

For developers pursuing battery energy storage system (BESS) projects, finding the right property is only the beginning. BESS site selection is as much a legal and transactional exercise as a real estate decision, with risk analysis central to the project’s ultimate success. Key Takeaways The core questions for BESS site selection in New York and […]

Author: Nicholas Wall

Link to post with title - "Before You Buy: Managing Real Estate and Permitting Risk for BESS Projects in New York and New Jersey"
What Business Owners Get Wrong Before Meeting a Litigation Attorney post image

What Business Owners Get Wrong Before Meeting a Litigation Attorney

What should you expect when meeting a litigation attorney about a business dispute? You should expect to describe the dispute in your own words, hand over the most important documents, flag any deadlines or immediate threats, and leave with a clearer picture of the problem, what information is still needed, and the likely next steps. […]

Author: Michael Mietlicki

Link to post with title - "What Business Owners Get Wrong Before Meeting a Litigation Attorney"

No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!

Explore What Matters Most to You.

Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.

Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.

Let`s get in touch!

* The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form. By providing a telephone number and submitting this form you are consenting to be contacted by SMS text message. Message & data rates may apply. Message frequency may vary. You can reply STOP to opt-out of further messaging.
“If you would like to submit a file, please email it directly to info@sh-law.com.

Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!