Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Date: July 28, 2014
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comPresident Obama has once again extended the reach of Executive power when he recently signed an Executive Order that prohibits federal contractors from discriminating on the basis of sexual orientation or gender identity. The Order also bolsters anti-discrimination laws for federal workers by adding gender identity to the list of protected categories, which already includes sexual orientation.
According to Corporate Counsel, the Executive Order will impact an estimated 24,000 companies with federal contractor designation, which employ approximately one-fifth of U.S. workers. These employers will now need to review their anti-discrimination policies and practices to ensure compliance with the new mandate.
There are presently no exemptions for religious organizations.
For private employers that do not transact with the federal government, federal law does not currently prohibit discrimination against lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) workers. The Employment Non-Discrimination Act (ENDA), which would include such protections, has been pending in Congress for several years. While it successfully cleared the Senate in 2013, the U.S. Supreme Court’s recent decision in Burwell v. Hobby Lobby has generated a new round of debate regarding the legislation’s broad religious exemption.
To some degree, the Executive Order may be unnecessary as many states (and, increasingly, municipalities) have such laws already in place. For instance, the New Jersey Law Against Discrimination includes both “affectional or sexual orientation” and “gender identity and expression” as protected classes. Accordingly, in New Jersey, any discrimination and/or retaliation against LGBT workers would be proper grounds for an employment lawsuit.
Even without a governmental mandates, an increasing number of U.S. companies include protections for LGBT workers in their discrimination and harassment policies. According to the White House’s fact sheet on the new executive order, 91percent of Fortune 500 companies already prohibit discrimination based on sexual orientation and 61 percent prohibit discrimination based on gender identity.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Case law following the 2010 amendments to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26 offers guidance on how courts are likely to address whether an expert witness’s AI records are subject to discovery. Key Takeaways Rule 26 Expert Discovery After the 2010 Amendments This article addresses the question courts and lawyers have faced in recent cases: […]
Author: Chris Seelinger

“Show how 3M is 0% at fault.” The absurd tale of how a 350-page ChatGPT history for 3M’s expert witness was produced during a deposition is more likely than you think. It’s an inevitable trend, and an unsettled question for federal courts as experts make generative AI part of their workflow. Key Takeaways Expert Witness […]
Author: Chris Seelinger

Screenshots have changed the risks of electronic communications. The screenshot problem is that messages intended for one person or a small group can be copied, forwarded, preserved, and ultimately presented to opposing counsel, regulators, journalists, customers, or a jury. Businesses should recognize that a truly private digital conversation is increasingly unreliable and ensure their policies, […]
Author: Sean M. Pena

Developers, engineering, procurement, and construction (EPC) contractors, and equipment suppliers each play a critical role in completing a BESS project. However, when equipment costs rise, deliveries are delayed, or regulations change, determining who bears the financial consequences can become contentious. Well-drafted project agreements are essential to sound risk allocation. Key Takeaways This article is Part […]
Author: Nicholas Wall

IP infringement occurs when someone uses your intellectual property without your permission or beyond the scope of the permission you granted. Common examples of IP infringement include copying a product’s patented features or using a trademarked logo in a way that is likely to confuse consumers about the source or affiliation of goods or services. […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki

When facing public allegations of wrongdoing, companies should not let the speed of the public conversation dictate the speed of an investigation. An investigation designed to confirm a preferred narrative rather than establish the facts can create serious problems later, particularly if litigation, regulatory scrutiny, or employment claims follow. Key Takeaways When public allegations surface […]
Author: Sean M. Pena
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!