
Robert E. Levy
Partner
201-896-7163 rlevy@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Robert E. Levy
Date: October 22, 2019

Partner
201-896-7163 rlevy@sh-law.comThe litigation funding industry has grown rapidly over the past few years. For businesses considering taking legal action, relying on a third party to fund the suit in exchange for a cut of the proceeds can be an attractive option. However, it is important to understand how legal finance works and when it may benefit your company.

In most cases, litigation funding involves a commercial litigant obtaining capital from a third-party to pay for the costs associated with litigation or arbitration in exchange for a portion of the final award or settlement. While the terms of the agreement between the litigant and funder may vary, the capital provided by the funder is typically used to cover the fees and expenses associated with a case, such as attorney’s fees, filing fees, discovery costs, and expert witness fees. However, in some cases, the litigant may seek to use the funding for a totally unrelated business purpose.
The funder is a passive investor and plays no role in the litigation or arbitration, although the funder will closely monitor the progress of the case. In addition, the funder is generally only entitled to payment if the litigant obtains an award or judgment in its favor. If the litigant is unsuccessful, the funder loses its investment and has no legal recourse against the funded party.
Litigation funding can be used for a wide range of business litigation cases, including breach of contract, unfair competition, intellectual property infringement, and securities fraud. Businesses can also obtain funding at various stages of a lawsuit, from prior to filing suit to recovery.
Funders are more interested in entering a finance agreement in cases involving a significant degree of upfront costs, but a high likelihood of monetary recovery in the end. Given that securing payment upon the conclusion of litigation/arbitration can often be the most challenging part of the case, funders often want to make sure that the other party to the litigation has sufficient assets.
In addition to looking for meritorious claims, funders also want to see that litigants have documents and other evidence to readily back them up. Conversely, they may be reluctant to invest in cases that rely too heavily on witness testimony or involve novel legal issues because they can be unpredictable.
Litigation funding can benefit businesses ranging from start-ups to Fortune 500 companies. For smaller companies, legal finance can allow a business to pursue a claim that it may not otherwise have been able to afford. For larger ones, litigation finance can be part of a larger risk-management strategy.
Lawsuits are expensive and can significantly impact any company’s bottom line. According to Burford Capital’s 2018 Litigation Finance Survey, 68 percent of in-house counsel reported that their company had chosen to forgo valid claims due to the impact that the related legal expenses would have on their company’s finances. For companies considering litigation funding, the ability to move the costs associated with litigation off their balance sheet is particularly attractive. Litigation funding also leaves businesses free to use their capital to address more pressing needs.
Funders will always conduct due diligence to determine whether to invest in a claim. This “second set of eyes” can be valuable to a business that is not yet convinced that the claim is worth pursuing. Funders will also track the status of their investment throughout the course of the case, which can also result in valuable feedback.
Litigation funding can be a useful tool for businesses contemplating costly commercial litigation. However, it is important to recognize that entering into a finance agreement is a complex legal endeavor in and of itself. Businesses should ensure that they fully understand their rights and obligations prior to entering into a funding agreement.
If you have any questions or if you would like to discuss the matter further, please contact me, Robert E. Levy, or the Scarinci Hollenbeck attorney with whom you work, at 201-806-3364.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Business mediation is a confidential, voluntary process in which a neutral third party helps companies negotiate a resolution to a commercial dispute without going to trial. Because working with a mediator is very different from litigating in the courtroom, it is important to understand how commercial mediation works, when it makes sense for your dispute, […]
Author: Paul Grossman

The five most common causes of construction defect litigation are design defects, substandard materials, workmanship defects, code violations, and subsurface defects. Because these flaws can compromise a building’s integrity, functionality, or safety, they frequently lead to disputes involving multiple parties and high financial stakes. Key takeaways: What is Construction Defect Litigation? Construction litigation is complex, […]
Author: Paul Grossman

The most effective ways to protect your business in a divorce are put in place before one begins: a prenuptial or postnuptial agreement, clean separation of business and personal finances, and divorce contingencies built into your operating or buy-sell agreements. If divorce is already underway, the priorities shift to establishing how the business is classified […]
Author: Jay McDaniel

The most common franchise disputes involve breach of contract, franchise termination and non-renewal, intellectual property rights, territorial encroachment, royalty and fee payments, franchisor support obligations, and violations of state franchise laws such as the New Jersey Franchise Practices Act. Franchisors and franchisees can often resolve these conflicts by providing written notice detailing the dispute and […]
Author: Paul Grossman

New Jersey businesses must manage legal and reputational risk together because modern disputes play out on two fronts at once: the legal proceeding itself and the court of public opinion, where customers, employees, investors, and business partners often reach conclusions long before a judge or jury has had the opportunity to evaluate the facts. Success […]
Author: Sean M. Pena

No. An eviction does not automatically end a tenant’s obligation to pay rent. Post-eviction rent claims are common because recovering possession resolves who has the right to occupy the premises, but it does not extinguish the tenant’s contractual obligations under the lease. Whether unpaid or future rent remains owed depends on three factors: the lease’s […]
Author: Donald M. Pepe
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!