As of January 2, 2021, trademark fees have officially increased…
Trademark fees have increased, effective January 2, 2021. This is the first time that the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) has increased fees in nearly three years.
According to the USPTO, the higher fees will enable it to “continue to enhance the quality of trademark examination, achieve optimal examination times, invest in modernizing trademark information technology systems and infrastructure, and provide stability to USPTO operations, even in times of financial fluctuations.”
Trademark Fee Changes Effective in 2021
On November 17, 2020, the USPTO issued a Final Rule to set or increase certain trademark fees, as authorized under the America Invents Act (AIA). The USPTO’s full list of fee changes and the rationale behind them are set forth in the Final Rule. Below is a brief summary of the fee changes:
Application and application-related fees
TEAS Standard: $350 per class Up from $275 per class
TEAS Plus: $250 per class Up from $225 per class
Post registration fees
Section 8 or 71 declaration filed through TEAS: $225 per class Up from $125 per class
New fee for deleting goods, services, and/or classes from a registration after submitting a Section 8 or 71 Declaration, but before the declaration is accepted: $250 per class if filed through TEAS
Petition to the Director and letter of protest fees
Petition to the Director filed through TEAS: $250 Up from $100
Petition to revive an abandoned application filed through TEAS: $150 Up from $100
New fee for letter of protest: $50 per application
TTAB fees
Petition to cancel filed through Electronic System for Trademark Trials and Appeals ( ESTTA): $600 per class Up from $400 per class
Notice of opposition filed through ESTTA: $600 per class Up from $400 per class
Initial 90-day extension requests for filing a notice of opposition, or second 60-day extension requests for filing a notice of opposition, filed through ESTTA: $200 per application Up from $100 per application
There is still no fee for a first 30-day extension request for filing a notice of opposition, filed through ESTTA.
Final 60-day extension request for filing a notice of opposition, filed through ESTTA: $400 per application Up from $200 per application
Ex parte appeal filed through ESTTA: $225 per class Up from $200 per class
New fee for second, and subsequent, requests for an extension of time to file an appeal brief in an ex parte appeal filed through ESTTA: $100 per application
There is still no fee for a first request.
New fee for appeal briefs in an ex parte appeal filed through ESTTA: $200 per class
New fee for requests for oral hearings: $500 per proceeding
The USPTO is also implementing partial refunds for petitions to cancel in default judgments if the cancellation involves only a nonuse or abandonment claim, the defendant didn’t appear, and there were no filings other than the petition to cancel.
New Fee for Requests to Delete Goods/Services
As set forth above, the USPTO is imposing a new fee if a request to delete goods, services, or classes from a registration is filed after a Section 8 or Section 71 Declaration is filed but before it’s accepted. No fee will be charged if the request is filed before a Section 8 or Section 71 Declaration is filed. According to the USPTO, charging a fee for deletions made between the filing and acceptance of the Section 8 or Section 71 Declaration will improve the integrity of the register by encouraging registrants to:
Determine sooner the goods, services, or classes in the registration for which their registered trademark is no longer in use.
Delete those goods, services, or classes from the registration before filing or within their Section 8 or 71 Declaration.
More quickly comply with statutory requirements regarding claims of use.
Key Takeaway
Some of the USPTO trademark fee hikes are significant, particularly when an application covers multiple classes. The broad increases will also impact both the registration and enforcement of trademarks.
If you have questions, please contact us
If you have any questions or if you would like to discuss the matter further, please contact me, David Einhorn, or the Scarinci Hollenbeck attorney with whom you work, at 201-896-4100.
IP Infringement: What Steps Can You Take If You're Affected?
IP infringement occurs when someone uses your intellectual property without your permission or beyond the scope of the permission you granted. Common examples of IP infringement include copying a product’s patented features or using a trademarked logo in a way that is likely to confuse consumers about the source or affiliation of goods or services. […]
Public Allegations, Unfinished Investigation: What New Jersey Businesses Should Do Next
When facing public allegations of wrongdoing, companies should not let the speed of the public conversation dictate the speed of an investigation. An investigation designed to confirm a preferred narrative rather than establish the facts can create serious problems later, particularly if litigation, regulatory scrutiny, or employment claims follow. Key Takeaways When public allegations surface […]
BESS Interconnection: Managing Grid, Cost, and Schedule Risk
For battery energy storage system (BESS) developers, securing equipment and site control is only part of the development equation. A project must also connect to the electric grid, and increasingly, BESS interconnection is one of the biggest sources of schedule, cost, and contractual risk. Key Takeaways This article is Part 3 of our Battery Storage […]
Navigating Director and Officer Liability in Times of Financial Distress
Director and officer liability increases sharply when a company is in financial distress. Decisions that would draw little attention in a healthy business can later be challenged by creditors, shareholders, bankruptcy trustees, and regulators as breaches of fiduciary duty, fraudulent transfers, or oversight failures. Understanding where that exposure comes from, and how to manage it, […]
Before You Buy: Managing Real Estate and Permitting Risk for BESS Projects in New York and New Jersey
For developers pursuing battery energy storage system (BESS) projects, finding the right property is only the beginning. BESS site selection is as much a legal and transactional exercise as a real estate decision, with risk analysis central to the project’s ultimate success. Key Takeaways The core questions for BESS site selection in New York and […]
What Business Owners Get Wrong Before Meeting a Litigation Attorney
What should you expect when meeting a litigation attorney about a business dispute? You should expect to describe the dispute in your own words, hand over the most important documents, flag any deadlines or immediate threats, and leave with a clearer picture of the problem, what information is still needed, and the likely next steps. […]
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court.
Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal
circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!
