Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Date: January 6, 2016
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comThis fall, New York Governor Andrew Cuomo signed a series of bills into law that will dramatically increase the equal pay and gender discrimination protections for female workers in the state. For New York employers, it is important to be aware that many of the changes under these laws become effective in the New Year. Further, it should be clear that Employers would be well advised to engage in a careful analysis of its equal pay practices and other policies to insure that all new requirements are addressed.

New York Labor Law (NYLL) § 194 will undergo the most substantive changes under the package of equal pay bills. The statute previously allowed employee pay differentials based on “any other factor other than sex.” Under the amendment, differentials may be based upon “a bona fide factor other than sex, such as education, training, or experience.” Employers must be prepared to affirmatively demonstrate that any such differential is job related and “consistent with business necessity.”
In addition, employers will not be able to rely on the “factor other than sex” defense if the employee can prove that:
Changes to the NYLL also address confidentiality provisions governing wages. Under the revised New York employment law, no employer may prohibit “an employee from inquiring about, discussing, or disclosing the wages of such employee or another employee.” However, businesses may place reasonable “limitations on the time, place and manner for inquiries about, discussion of, or the disclosure of wages.”
The equal pay revisions also make clear that equal pay analysis must include work in different locations by expanding the definition of “same establishment” to include “workplaces located in the same geographical region, no larger than a county.” Lastly, the amendments increase the cost of willfully violating the equal pay law by increasing liquidated damages liability to 300 percent of the total amount of wages owed.
Below is a brief review of several other key legal changes signed into law:
The new laws become effective on January 19, 2016. Accordingly, New York employers should review their policies and procedures to verify that they are in compliance and make any necessary changes as soon as possible.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Case law following the 2010 amendments to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26 offers guidance on how courts are likely to address whether an expert witness’s AI records are subject to discovery. Key Takeaways Rule 26 Expert Discovery After the 2010 Amendments This article addresses the question courts and lawyers have faced in recent cases: […]
Author: Chris Seelinger

“Show how 3M is 0% at fault.” The absurd tale of how a 350-page ChatGPT history for 3M’s expert witness was produced during a deposition is more likely than you think. It’s an inevitable trend, and an unsettled question for federal courts as experts make generative AI part of their workflow. Key Takeaways Expert Witness […]
Author: Chris Seelinger

Screenshots have changed the risks of electronic communications. The screenshot problem is that messages intended for one person or a small group can be copied, forwarded, preserved, and ultimately presented to opposing counsel, regulators, journalists, customers, or a jury. Businesses should recognize that a truly private digital conversation is increasingly unreliable and ensure their policies, […]
Author: Sean M. Pena

Developers, engineering, procurement, and construction (EPC) contractors, and equipment suppliers each play a critical role in completing a BESS project. However, when equipment costs rise, deliveries are delayed, or regulations change, determining who bears the financial consequences can become contentious. Well-drafted project agreements are essential to sound risk allocation. Key Takeaways This article is Part […]
Author: Nicholas Wall

IP infringement occurs when someone uses your intellectual property without your permission or beyond the scope of the permission you granted. Common examples of IP infringement include copying a product’s patented features or using a trademarked logo in a way that is likely to confuse consumers about the source or affiliation of goods or services. […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki

When facing public allegations of wrongdoing, companies should not let the speed of the public conversation dictate the speed of an investigation. An investigation designed to confirm a preferred narrative rather than establish the facts can create serious problems later, particularly if litigation, regulatory scrutiny, or employment claims follow. Key Takeaways When public allegations surface […]
Author: Sean M. Pena
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!