
Daniel T. McKillop
Partner
201-896-7115 dmckillop@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Daniel T. McKillop
Date: April 12, 2024

Partner
201-896-7115 dmckillop@sh-law.com
On Tuesday, April 30, 2024, Partner & Chair of Scarinci Hollenbeck’s Cannabis Law Department Daniel T. McKillop will co-moderate the NJSBA 6th Annual Cannabis and Psychedelics Law Symposium.
“The businesses of cannabis and psychedelics are some of the most exciting industries to participate in as they are quickly evolving in tandem with new laws,” stated Mr. McKillop. “Whether you’re new to these spaces or currently practice, you’re not going to want to miss this review and discussion about the status and future of these marketplaces,” he continued. “I’m looking forward to moderating with my NJSBA Cannabis and Psychedelics Law Committee co-chair Sarah Trent and participating in the psychedelics panel during the event.”
Presented in cooperation with the NJSBA Cannabis and Psychedelics Law Special Committee, the seminar will feature presentations by industry attorneys discussing the current state of cannabis and psychedelics law, ethics, the future of regulated substances law, dispensary operations, and much more. Attendees are eligible to earn up to 6.9 NJ CLE credits.
Learn more about the seminar and register:
https://njsba.com/event/latest-developments-in-cannabis-and-psychedelics-law
Founded in 1899, the NJSBA is the largest organization of attorneys, judges, and legal professionals in New Jersey. At the core of our mission is improving the lives of our members, advancing the rule of law, and serving as the voice of the profession. With 85 sections and committees, the NJSBA allows attorneys to benefit from being part of the most wide-reaching legal association in the state, while still cultivating expertise and building networks within specialized practice areas.
Learn more about the NJSBA: https://njsba.com/about/
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Case law following the 2010 amendments to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26 offers guidance on how courts are likely to address whether an expert witness’s AI records are subject to discovery. Key Takeaways Rule 26 Expert Discovery After the 2010 Amendments This article addresses the question courts and lawyers have faced in recent cases: […]
Author: Chris Seelinger

“Show how 3M is 0% at fault.” The absurd tale of how a 350-page ChatGPT history for 3M’s expert witness was produced during a deposition is more likely than you think. It’s an inevitable trend, and an unsettled question for federal courts as experts make generative AI part of their workflow. Key Takeaways Expert Witness […]
Author: Chris Seelinger

Screenshots have changed the risks of electronic communications. The screenshot problem is that messages intended for one person or a small group can be copied, forwarded, preserved, and ultimately presented to opposing counsel, regulators, journalists, customers, or a jury. Businesses should recognize that a truly private digital conversation is increasingly unreliable and ensure their policies, […]
Author: Sean M. Pena

Developers, engineering, procurement, and construction (EPC) contractors, and equipment suppliers each play a critical role in completing a BESS project. However, when equipment costs rise, deliveries are delayed, or regulations change, determining who bears the financial consequences can become contentious. Well-drafted project agreements are essential to sound risk allocation. Key Takeaways This article is Part […]
Author: Nicholas Wall

IP infringement occurs when someone uses your intellectual property without your permission or beyond the scope of the permission you granted. Common examples of IP infringement include copying a product’s patented features or using a trademarked logo in a way that is likely to confuse consumers about the source or affiliation of goods or services. […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki

When facing public allegations of wrongdoing, companies should not let the speed of the public conversation dictate the speed of an investigation. An investigation designed to confirm a preferred narrative rather than establish the facts can create serious problems later, particularly if litigation, regulatory scrutiny, or employment claims follow. Key Takeaways When public allegations surface […]
Author: Sean M. Pena
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!