Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Date: May 11, 2020
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comThe U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) is further extending the time to file certain patent and trademark-related documents and to pay certain required fees in light of the ongoing coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic. Deadlines have now been extended to June 1, 2020, for those impacted.
As discussed in greater detail in a prior article, the Coronavirus Aid, Relief and Economic Security (CARES) Act authorized the USPTO to extend the statutory filing deadlines in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. On March 31, the USPTO exercised that authority by providing the possibility of a 30-day extension of certain due dates in patent and trademarks matters that had an original due date between March 27 and April 30, 2020. On April 28, 2020, the USPTO granted additional relief to trademark and patent owners.
The USPTO’s patent relief is set forth in a notice titled “Notice of Extended Waiver of Patent-Related Timing Deadlines Under the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act and Other Relief Available to Patent Applicants and Patentees.” For deadlines in patent applications, reexamination proceedings, and proceedings before the PTAB, other than trial proceedings, if an eligible document or fee was or is due between (and inclusive of) March 27, 2020, and May 31, 2020, the filing will be considered timely if filed on or before June 1, 2020, provided that the filing is accompanied by a statement that the delay in filing or payment was due to the COVID-19 outbreak.
A delay is “due” to the COVID-19 outbreak when the outbreak materially interfered with the filing of a paper or fee. Circumstances that qualify as materially interfering include, without limitation, office closures, cash flow interruptions, lack of access to files or other materials, travel delays, personal or family illness, or other similar circumstances. The person affected by the outbreak may be a practitioner, applicant, patent owner, petitioner, third-party requester, inventor, or other person associated with the filing or fee.
For a trial proceeding before the PTAB, if an eligible filing was or is due between (and inclusive of) March 27, 2020, and April 30, 2020, the filing will be considered timely if made within 30 days of the original due date, provided that the filing is accompanied by a statement that the delay in filing or payment was due to the COVID-19 outbreak. For filings due after April 30, 2020, parties must contact PTAB for a request for relief.
The USPTO also extended certain trademark filing and payment deadlines, as set forth in its “Notice of Extended Waiver of Trademark-Related Timing Deadlines Under the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act and Other Relief Available to Trademark Applicants and Trademark Owners.”
If an eligible document or fee was or is due between (and inclusive of) March 27, 2020, and May 31, 2020, the filing will be considered timely if filed on or before June 1, 2020, provided that the filing is accompanied by a statement that the delay in filing or payment was due to the COVID-19 outbreak. The following filings are eligible for the period of relief:
For trademark applications that were abandoned and registrations that were canceled/expired due to an inability to timely respond to a Trademark-related Office communication having a due date of May 31, 2020, or earlier as a result of the effects of the COVID-19 outbreak, the USPTO has waived the petition fee to revive the abandoned application or reinstate the canceled/expired registration.
According to the USPTO, it will continue to evaluate the evolving situation around the COVID-19 outbreak and the impact on the USPTO’s operations and stakeholders. If the USPTO further extends the CARES Act relief, we will provide updates here.
If you have any questions or if you would like to discuss the matter further, please contact me, David Einhorn, or the Scarinci Hollenbeck attorney with whom you work, at 201-896-4100.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

When a family member can no longer make important decisions for themself, the question is often not whether the family will step in, but whether they have the legal authority to do so. A spouse may manage household finances, or an adult child may arrange medical care and pay bills. Still, informal assistance does not […]
Author: Marc J. Comer

New Jersey residential developers with affordable housing obligations should carefully review their existing approvals, development agreements, and proposed deed restrictions in light of the State’s revised UHAC regulations (Uniform Housing Affordability Controls). The regulations, which took effect on November 6, 2025, significantly change the administration and physical requirements for affordable housing units. For developers with […]
Author: Wendy Rubinstein Quiroga

A “no comment” response is sometimes the right call when a legal problem arises. As a blanket policy, however, it lets allegations go unanswered, deadlines pass, evidence disappear, and manageable disputes grow into expensive litigation. The businesses that fare best are usually the ones that say little publicly while acting decisively behind the scenes. When […]
Author: Sean M. Pena

Utility-scale battery energy storage systems (BESS) are becoming an increasingly important component of the electric grid throughout New Jersey, New York, and Pennsylvania. As renewable generation expands, electricity demand increases and grid operators seek greater flexibility, battery storage can help balance supply and demand while providing additional capacity and reliability. For developers, battery storage presents […]
Author: Nicholas Wall

A falling out between partners can be disastrous for any business. In many cases, the partnership will not survive. If you are in an unworkable situation with your partners, it may be time to consult a partnership dispute lawyer experienced in handling partnership breakups and dissolutions before the situation deteriorates any further. It is easy […]
Author: Jay McDaniel

When a company enters Chapter 11 bankruptcy, many assume the process will culminate in a lengthy reorganization plan. However, distressed businesses are increasingly being sold through a different mechanism — a sale under Section 363 of the United States Bankruptcy Code. A Section 363 sale allows a company, as a debtor-in-possession in bankruptcy, to sell […]
Author: John D. Giampolo
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!