Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Warner Bros. Wins Superman Copyright Lawsuit
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Date: January 23, 2013
Key Contacts
Back
Winner in Copyright Lawsuit
Warner Bros. emerged as the winner in a copyright lawsuit that has been going on for years regarding copyrights the Superman franchise.
The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals overruled a 2008 lower court decision, which gave Superman co-creator Jerome Siegel’s estate the go-ahead to recapture rights to the Superman saga. The battle between Warner Bros. and the estates of the character’s creators, Jerome Siegel and Joseph Shuster has been ongoing. In the 1930s, the creators sold their rights to the character for less than it was worth in the early days. However, the estates sued to recapture the rights to the franchise after the 1976 included a provision allows artists who sold their rights under unfair bargaining to reclaim their copyrights.
Under this law, both creators’ estates won a lawsuit in 2008 that would require Warner Bros. to share profits from franchise products. On appeal, however, Warner Bros. was able to produce a negotiated agreement between the company and Siegel’s widow that was agreed upon in 2001, in which Warner Bros. would provide fair compensation for the rights her husband had sold. A similar agreement was mapped out with Shuster’s estate in 1992.
The court determined that these agreements were not effectively taken into consideration during the 2008 trial, and granted Warner Bros. full rights to the Superman franchise. The ruling comes just before the release of “Man of Steel” in June 2013.
“This is a great day for Superman, for his fans, for DC Entertainment and for Warner Bros.,” said a representative for Warner Bros. “Today’s ruling vindicates DC Comics’ long-held position that it entered into a binding agreement with the Jerry Siegel family in 2001. The Court’s decision paves the way for the Siegels to finally to receive the compensation they negotiated for and which DC has been prepared to pay for over a decade. We are extremely pleased that Superman’s adventures can continue to be enjoyed across all media platforms worldwide for generations to come.”
Despite the victory on appeal, matters relating to copyright and entertainment law can be complex, and it remains possible that the estates may choose to take the matter to the Supreme Court.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Related Posts
See all
Does Your Homeowners Insurance Provide Adequate Coverage?
Your home is likely your greatest asset, which is why it is so important to adequately protect it. Homeowners insurance protects you from the financial costs of unforeseen losses, such as theft, fire, and natural disasters, by helping you rebuild and replace possessions that were lost While the definition of “adequate” coverage depends upon a […]
Author: Jesse M. Dimitro
Understanding the Importance of a Non-Contingent Offer
Making a non-contingent offer can dramatically increase your chances of securing a real estate transaction, particularly in competitive markets like New York City. However, buyers should understand that waiving contingencies, including those related to financing, or appraisals, also comes with significant risks. Determining your best strategy requires careful analysis of the property, the market, and […]
Author: Jesse M. Dimitro
Fred D. Zemel Appointed Chair of Strategic Planning at Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC
Business Transactional Attorney Zemel to Spearhead Strategic Initiatives for Continued Growth and Innovation Little Falls, NJ – February 21, 2025 – Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC is pleased to announce that Partner Fred D. Zemel has been named Chair of the firm’s Strategic Planning Committee. In this role, Mr. Zemel will lead the committee in identifying, […]
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Novation Agreement Process: Step-by-Step Guide for Businesses
Big changes sometimes occur during the life cycle of a contract. Cancelling a contract outright can be bad for your reputation and your bottom line. Businesses need to know how to best address a change in circumstances, while also protecting their legal rights. One option is to transfer the “benefits and the burdens” of a […]
Author: Dan Brecher
What Is a Trade Secret? Key Elements and Legal Protections Explained
What is a trade secret and why you you protect them? Technology has made trade secret theft even easier and more prevalent. In fact, businesses lose billions of dollars every year due to trade secret theft committed by employees, competitors, and even foreign governments. But what is a trade secret? And how do you protect […]
Author: Ronald S. Bienstock
What Is Title Insurance? Safeguarding Against Title Defects
If you are considering the purchase of a property, you may wonder — what is title insurance, do I need it, and why do I need it? Even seasoned property owners may question if the added expense and extra paperwork is really necessary, especially considering that people and entities insured by title insurance make fewer […]
Author: Patrick T. Conlon
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Warner Bros. Wins Superman Copyright Lawsuit
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Winner in Copyright Lawsuit
Warner Bros. emerged as the winner in a copyright lawsuit that has been going on for years regarding copyrights the Superman franchise.
The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals overruled a 2008 lower court decision, which gave Superman co-creator Jerome Siegel’s estate the go-ahead to recapture rights to the Superman saga. The battle between Warner Bros. and the estates of the character’s creators, Jerome Siegel and Joseph Shuster has been ongoing. In the 1930s, the creators sold their rights to the character for less than it was worth in the early days. However, the estates sued to recapture the rights to the franchise after the 1976 included a provision allows artists who sold their rights under unfair bargaining to reclaim their copyrights.
Under this law, both creators’ estates won a lawsuit in 2008 that would require Warner Bros. to share profits from franchise products. On appeal, however, Warner Bros. was able to produce a negotiated agreement between the company and Siegel’s widow that was agreed upon in 2001, in which Warner Bros. would provide fair compensation for the rights her husband had sold. A similar agreement was mapped out with Shuster’s estate in 1992.
The court determined that these agreements were not effectively taken into consideration during the 2008 trial, and granted Warner Bros. full rights to the Superman franchise. The ruling comes just before the release of “Man of Steel” in June 2013.
“This is a great day for Superman, for his fans, for DC Entertainment and for Warner Bros.,” said a representative for Warner Bros. “Today’s ruling vindicates DC Comics’ long-held position that it entered into a binding agreement with the Jerry Siegel family in 2001. The Court’s decision paves the way for the Siegels to finally to receive the compensation they negotiated for and which DC has been prepared to pay for over a decade. We are extremely pleased that Superman’s adventures can continue to be enjoyed across all media platforms worldwide for generations to come.”
Despite the victory on appeal, matters relating to copyright and entertainment law can be complex, and it remains possible that the estates may choose to take the matter to the Supreme Court.