
Dan Brecher
Counsel
212-286-0747 dbrecher@sh-law.com
Counsel
212-286-0747 dbrecher@sh-law.comA recent New York court decision highlights that letters of intent can often lead to messy breach of contract lawsuits – especially when it comes to the concept of agreement to agree.

As the appeals court highlighted in New York Military Academy v. NewOpen Group, businesses can’t enforce the terms of a letter of intent unless both parties intended it to be a binding contract.
The New York Military Academy and NewOpen Group executed a letter of intent regarding a potential joint venture and loan. The letter of intent provided that parties “shall negotiate to arrive at mutually acceptable Definitive Agreements” regarding the potential joint venture and loan. The letter of intent further provided that the parties “each reserve the right to withdraw from further negotiations at any time if, in the sole judgment of either or both, it is in either Party’s best interest to do so, without further liability or obligation to the other.”
…it is essential that that the letter of intent is precisely written to reflect the true intent of the parties…
After negotiations broke down, the New York Military Academy filed suit, asserting causes of action alleging breach of contract, breach of the covenant of good faith and fair dealing, promissory estoppel, and fraud. The defendants moved to dismiss the complaint. After the New York Supreme Court denied the motion, NewOpen Group appealed.
The New York appeals court reversed the lower court’s decision and dismissed the New York breach of contract litigation. “The Supreme Court should have granted the defendants’ motion pursuant to CPLR 3211(a) to dismiss the complaint, as documentary evidence, in the form of the letter of intent, utterly refuted the plaintiff’s factual allegations, thereby conclusively establishing a defense as a matter of law,” the court held.
In support of its decision, the court cited prior precedent holding that it is well-settled under New York common law of contracts that a mere agreement to agree, in which a material term is left for future negotiations, is unenforceable. “Here, the letter of intent demonstrated that the plaintiff’s allegations of breach of contract related to a mere agreement to agree,” the appeals court explained.
To avoid a costly legal dispute, New York businesses should ensure that all letters of intent are properly drafted to expressly indicate if certain provisions are enforceable agreements in and of themselves (such as confidentiality provisions), even if a final transaction is still under negotiation. Since it is essential that that the letter of intent is precisely written to reflect the true intent of the parties, the assistance of an experienced business lawyer is often advisable.
Otherwise, if you’re a business owner unsure of how to properly put together a letter of intent or would like to discuss the matter further, please contact me, Dan Brecher.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Compliance programs are no longer judged by how they look on paper, but by how they function in the real world. Compliance monitoring is the ongoing process of reviewing, testing, and evaluating whether policies, procedures, and controls are being followed—and whether they are actually working. What Is Compliance Monitoring? In today’s heightened regulatory environment, compliance […]
Author: Dan Brecher

New Jersey personal guaranty liability is a critical issue for business owners who regularly sign contracts on behalf of their companies. A recent New Jersey Supreme Court decision provides valuable guidance on when a business owner can be held personally responsible for a company’s debt. Under the Court’s decision in Extech Building Materials, Inc. v. […]
Author: Charles H. Friedrich

Commercial real estate trends in 2026 are being shaped by shifting economic conditions, technological innovation, and evolving tenant demands. As the market adjusts to changing interest rates, capital flows, and workplace models, investors, owners, tenants, and developers must understand how these trends are influencing opportunities and risk in the year ahead. Overall Outlook for Commercial […]
Author: Michael J. Willner

Part 2 – Tips Excluded from Income Certain employees and independent contractors may be eligible to deduct tips from their income for tax years 2025 through 2028 under provisions included in the One Big Beautiful Bill. The deduction is capped at $25,000 per year and begins to phase out at $150,000 of modified adjusted gross […]
Author: Scott H. Novak

Part 1 – Overtime Pay and Income Tax Treatment Overview This Firm Insights post summarizes one provision of the “One Big Beautiful Bill” related to the tax treatment of overtime compensation and related employer wage reporting obligations. Overtime Pay and Employee Tax Treatment The Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) generally requires that overtime be paid […]
Author: Scott H. Novak

In 2025, New York enacted one of the most consequential updates to its consumer protection framework in decades. The Fostering Affordability and Integrity through Reasonable Business Practices Act (FAIR Act) significantly expands the scope and strength of New York’s long-standing consumer protection statute, General Business Law § 349, and alters the compliance landscape for New York […]
Author: Dan Brecher
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!