
Scott H. Novak
Partner
201-896-7240 snovak@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Scott H. Novak
Date: January 27, 2026

Partner
201-896-7240 snovak@sh-law.com
This Firm Insights post summarizes one provision of the “One Big Beautiful Bill” related to the tax treatment of overtime compensation and related employer wage reporting obligations.
The Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) generally requires that overtime be paid to certain employees at a rate of one-and-a-half times their regular rate of pay after 40 hours in a workweek. There are exceptions.
For the years 2025 through 2028, employees who receive overtime pay may be able to deduct one-half of that overtime compensation from their income and thus not pay income taxes on that portion. The maximum deductible amount in any year is $12,500 ($25,000 for joint filers). The deduction begins to phase out at $150,000 of income ($300,000 for joint filers). The deduction may be taken whether or not the taxpayer itemizes deductions.
The deduction applies only to “qualified overtime compensation.” This refers to overtime compensation that an employer is required to pay under the FLSA.
If an employer is not required to pay overtime under the FLSA but does so pursuant to its own policies, that pay is not qualified overtime compensation. Likewise, if an employer pays overtime at a rate higher than time-and-a-half, only the portion equal to the FLSA-required premium is eligible for the deduction.
For example, if an employee earning $10 per hour is paid $15 per hour for overtime, the $5 premium is deductible. If the employee is instead paid double-time at $20 per hour, only $5 of that $10 premium is deductible. The deductible amount is based solely on the FLSA-mandated time-and-a-half rate.
Overtime that arises solely from employer policies (such as holidays, weekends, or scheduled days off), state or local law, collective bargaining agreements, or other contractual arrangements does not qualify for the deduction.
The enactment of the new law did not allow sufficient time for all employers to retool their wage reporting systems to separately report qualified overtime compensation on 2025 Forms W-2. As a result, the IRS has granted transitional relief for 2025, meaning employers will not face penalties for failing to separately report overtime for that year.
For 2026 through 2028, the law contemplates separate reporting of qualified overtime compensation on employee W-2 forms.
The overtime-related provisions discussed above represent only one component of the broader tax changes included in the “One Big Beautiful Bill.” Employers and employees should continue to monitor how these provisions are implemented and consider how overtime pay, payroll reporting, and compensation strategies may be affected.
For additional guidance on these issues and related tax planning considerations, contact Scott Novak to discuss your specific circumstances.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Case law following the 2010 amendments to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26 offers guidance on how courts are likely to address whether an expert witness’s AI records are subject to discovery. Key Takeaways Rule 26 Expert Discovery After the 2010 Amendments This article addresses the question courts and lawyers have faced in recent cases: […]
Author: Chris Seelinger

“Show how 3M is 0% at fault.” The absurd tale of how a 350-page ChatGPT history for 3M’s expert witness was produced during a deposition is more likely than you think. It’s an inevitable trend, and an unsettled question for federal courts as experts make generative AI part of their workflow. Key Takeaways Expert Witness […]
Author: Chris Seelinger

Screenshots have changed the risks of electronic communications. The screenshot problem is that messages intended for one person or a small group can be copied, forwarded, preserved, and ultimately presented to opposing counsel, regulators, journalists, customers, or a jury. Businesses should recognize that a truly private digital conversation is increasingly unreliable and ensure their policies, […]
Author: Sean M. Pena

Developers, engineering, procurement, and construction (EPC) contractors, and equipment suppliers each play a critical role in completing a BESS project. However, when equipment costs rise, deliveries are delayed, or regulations change, determining who bears the financial consequences can become contentious. Well-drafted project agreements are essential to sound risk allocation. Key Takeaways This article is Part […]
Author: Nicholas Wall

IP infringement occurs when someone uses your intellectual property without your permission or beyond the scope of the permission you granted. Common examples of IP infringement include copying a product’s patented features or using a trademarked logo in a way that is likely to confuse consumers about the source or affiliation of goods or services. […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki

When facing public allegations of wrongdoing, companies should not let the speed of the public conversation dictate the speed of an investigation. An investigation designed to confirm a preferred narrative rather than establish the facts can create serious problems later, particularly if litigation, regulatory scrutiny, or employment claims follow. Key Takeaways When public allegations surface […]
Author: Sean M. Pena
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!