
Dan Brecher
Counsel
212-286-0747 dbrecher@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Dan Brecher
Date: February 4, 2026

Counsel
212-286-0747 dbrecher@sh-law.com
Compliance programs are no longer judged by how they look on paper, but by how they function in the real world. Compliance monitoring is the ongoing process of reviewing, testing, and evaluating whether policies, procedures, and controls are being followed—and whether they are actually working.
In today’s heightened regulatory environment, compliance is critical to the success of any business. Compliance monitoring routinely assesses whether your business is adhering to regulatory requirements, including internal policies, applicable laws and regulations, and industry-specific standards.
Compliance monitoring generally involves regular oversight of processes, conducting audits, and reviewing records to identify non-compliant areas and take corrective action. By contrast, audits are typically periodic and retrospective, while investigations are reactive and triggered by potential misconduct.
Regulators across industries increasingly emphasize compliance monitoring as a core indicator of whether an organization’s compliance framework is effective, credible, and capable of preventing misconduct before it escalates into enforcement action. New York and New Jersey businesses that can demonstrate robust monitoring are also better positioned to show good-faith efforts to prevent violations, which may influence charging decisions, penalties, and settlement terms.
When done well, compliance monitoring can also:
Regulatory requirements can vary widely depending on the industry, location, and nature of your business. Before implementing a compliance monitoring program, it’s important to define and set your objectives, carefully tailoring your approach to your unique business.
Adhering to best practices can also help develop an effective compliance monitoring program. Below are several to consider:
Monitoring should be aligned with the organization’s specific risk profile. A “one-size-fits-all” approach often results in under-monitoring critical risks and over-monitoring low-risk activities. High-risk business units, geographies, transactions, or third-party relationships warrant more frequent and detailed oversight.
Without accountability, monitoring becomes a box-checking exercise. While compliance teams often design monitoring protocols, business units play a critical role in execution. Effective programs define:
Modern compliance monitoring increasingly relies on data analytics. Transaction testing, exception reports, and trend analysis allow organizations to identify anomalies that merit further review. To truly add value, metrics should be meaningful. High volumes of reports or training completions alone do not demonstrate effectiveness. Instead, organizations should focus on indicators that reflect behavioral outcomes and control performance.
Thorough documentation and reporting are essential to an effective compliance monitoring program. While the specific content may vary by audience, i.e., regulators vs. senior management, compliance reports should outline the organization’s position on compliance, highlight any non-compliant areas, and detail remediation efforts. It is also imperative to maintain audit trails, properly manage version control, and ensure that all compliance-related documentation is securely stored.
Monitoring is only valuable if issues are addressed. In many cases, failure to remediate known issues may be viewed more harshly than the underlying violation itself.
Effective programs include:
Monitoring should inform and be informed by other compliance activities, such as risk assessments, training, policy updates, and internal audits. Feedback loops help ensure the program evolves alongside your company’s risk landscape.
Compliance monitoring is no longer considered optional. It is a central element of any credible compliance program and a key factor regulators consider when evaluating organizational conduct. New York and New Jersey businesses that invest in thoughtful, risk-based monitoring—supported by data, accountability, and remediation—are better positioned to prevent misconduct, respond effectively when issues arise, and demonstrate a genuine commitment to compliance.
Scarinci Hollenbeck works with businesses of various sizes and across a wide range of industries. Our team of New York and New Jersey business attorneys relies on best practices and proven strategies to help businesses establish effective corporate compliance programs and maintain compliance in response to regulatory changes.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Case law following the 2010 amendments to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26 offers guidance on how courts are likely to address whether an expert witness’s AI records are subject to discovery. Key Takeaways Rule 26 Expert Discovery After the 2010 Amendments This article addresses the question courts and lawyers have faced in recent cases: […]
Author: Chris Seelinger

“Show how 3M is 0% at fault.” The absurd tale of how a 350-page ChatGPT history for 3M’s expert witness was produced during a deposition is more likely than you think. It’s an inevitable trend, and an unsettled question for federal courts as experts make generative AI part of their workflow. Key Takeaways Expert Witness […]
Author: Chris Seelinger

Screenshots have changed the risks of electronic communications. The screenshot problem is that messages intended for one person or a small group can be copied, forwarded, preserved, and ultimately presented to opposing counsel, regulators, journalists, customers, or a jury. Businesses should recognize that a truly private digital conversation is increasingly unreliable and ensure their policies, […]
Author: Sean M. Pena

Developers, engineering, procurement, and construction (EPC) contractors, and equipment suppliers each play a critical role in completing a BESS project. However, when equipment costs rise, deliveries are delayed, or regulations change, determining who bears the financial consequences can become contentious. Well-drafted project agreements are essential to sound risk allocation. Key Takeaways This article is Part […]
Author: Nicholas Wall

IP infringement occurs when someone uses your intellectual property without your permission or beyond the scope of the permission you granted. Common examples of IP infringement include copying a product’s patented features or using a trademarked logo in a way that is likely to confuse consumers about the source or affiliation of goods or services. […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki

When facing public allegations of wrongdoing, companies should not let the speed of the public conversation dictate the speed of an investigation. An investigation designed to confirm a preferred narrative rather than establish the facts can create serious problems later, particularly if litigation, regulatory scrutiny, or employment claims follow. Key Takeaways When public allegations surface […]
Author: Sean M. Pena
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!