
Dan Brecher
Counsel
212-286-0747 dbrecher@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Dan Brecher
Date: February 4, 2026

Counsel
212-286-0747 dbrecher@sh-law.com
Compliance programs are no longer judged by how they look on paper, but by how they function in the real world. Compliance monitoring is the ongoing process of reviewing, testing, and evaluating whether policies, procedures, and controls are being followed—and whether they are actually working.
In today’s heightened regulatory environment, compliance is critical to the success of any business. Compliance monitoring routinely assesses whether your business is adhering to regulatory requirements, including internal policies, applicable laws and regulations, and industry-specific standards.
Compliance monitoring generally involves regular oversight of processes, conducting audits, and reviewing records to identify non-compliant areas and take corrective action. By contrast, audits are typically periodic and retrospective, while investigations are reactive and triggered by potential misconduct.
Regulators across industries increasingly emphasize compliance monitoring as a core indicator of whether an organization’s compliance framework is effective, credible, and capable of preventing misconduct before it escalates into enforcement action. New York and New Jersey businesses that can demonstrate robust monitoring are also better positioned to show good-faith efforts to prevent violations, which may influence charging decisions, penalties, and settlement terms.
When done well, compliance monitoring can also:
Regulatory requirements can vary widely depending on the industry, location, and nature of your business. Before implementing a compliance monitoring program, it’s important to define and set your objectives, carefully tailoring your approach to your unique business.
Adhering to best practices can also help develop an effective compliance monitoring program. Below are several to consider:
Monitoring should be aligned with the organization’s specific risk profile. A “one-size-fits-all” approach often results in under-monitoring critical risks and over-monitoring low-risk activities. High-risk business units, geographies, transactions, or third-party relationships warrant more frequent and detailed oversight.
Without accountability, monitoring becomes a box-checking exercise. While compliance teams often design monitoring protocols, business units play a critical role in execution. Effective programs define:
Modern compliance monitoring increasingly relies on data analytics. Transaction testing, exception reports, and trend analysis allow organizations to identify anomalies that merit further review. To truly add value, metrics should be meaningful. High volumes of reports or training completions alone do not demonstrate effectiveness. Instead, organizations should focus on indicators that reflect behavioral outcomes and control performance.
Thorough documentation and reporting are essential to an effective compliance monitoring program. While the specific content may vary by audience, i.e., regulators vs. senior management, compliance reports should outline the organization’s position on compliance, highlight any non-compliant areas, and detail remediation efforts. It is also imperative to maintain audit trails, properly manage version control, and ensure that all compliance-related documentation is securely stored.
Monitoring is only valuable if issues are addressed. In many cases, failure to remediate known issues may be viewed more harshly than the underlying violation itself.
Effective programs include:
Monitoring should inform and be informed by other compliance activities, such as risk assessments, training, policy updates, and internal audits. Feedback loops help ensure the program evolves alongside your company’s risk landscape.
Compliance monitoring is no longer considered optional. It is a central element of any credible compliance program and a key factor regulators consider when evaluating organizational conduct. New York and New Jersey businesses that invest in thoughtful, risk-based monitoring—supported by data, accountability, and remediation—are better positioned to prevent misconduct, respond effectively when issues arise, and demonstrate a genuine commitment to compliance.
Scarinci Hollenbeck works with businesses of various sizes and across a wide range of industries. Our team of New York and New Jersey business attorneys relies on best practices and proven strategies to help businesses establish effective corporate compliance programs and maintain compliance in response to regulatory changes.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

The five most common causes of construction defect litigation are design defects, substandard materials, workmanship defects, code violations, and subsurface defects. Because these flaws can compromise a building’s integrity, functionality, or safety, they frequently lead to disputes involving multiple parties and high financial stakes. Key takeaways: What is Construction Defect Litigation? Construction litigation is complex, […]
Author: Paul Grossman

The most effective ways to protect your business in a divorce are put in place before one begins: a prenuptial or postnuptial agreement, clean separation of business and personal finances, and divorce contingencies built into your operating or buy-sell agreements. If divorce is already underway, the priorities shift to establishing how the business is classified […]
Author: Jay McDaniel

The most common franchise disputes involve breach of contract, franchise termination and non-renewal, intellectual property rights, territorial encroachment, royalty and fee payments, franchisor support obligations, and violations of state franchise laws such as the New Jersey Franchise Practices Act. Franchisors and franchisees can often resolve these conflicts by providing written notice detailing the dispute and […]
Author: Paul Grossman

New Jersey businesses must manage legal and reputational risk together because modern disputes play out on two fronts at once: the legal proceeding itself and the court of public opinion, where customers, employees, investors, and business partners often reach conclusions long before a judge or jury has had the opportunity to evaluate the facts. Success […]
Author: Sean M. Pena

No. An eviction does not automatically end a tenant’s obligation to pay rent. Post-eviction rent claims are common because recovering possession resolves who has the right to occupy the premises, but it does not extinguish the tenant’s contractual obligations under the lease. Whether unpaid or future rent remains owed depends on three factors: the lease’s […]
Author: Donald M. Pepe

A company is dissolved; legally, it ceases to exist. Accordingly, dissolution results in significant legal and financial consequences. It is a process that must be properly managed to avoid continuing liability. The Corporate Dissolution Process Corporate dissolution is the legal process of formally closing a corporation, paying its debts and distributing the remaining assets. Most […]
Author: Jay McDaniel
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!