Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC, LLCScarinci Hollenbeck, LLC, LLC

Firm Insights

SECURE 2.0 RMD Planning Strategies

Author: Marc J. Comer

Date: March 25, 2026

Key Contacts

Back
SECURE 2.0 RMD planning strategies for retirement and estate planning

How the Updated Law Shapes Retirement and Estate Planning

The SECURE 2.0 Act of 2022 materially reshapes the required minimum distribution (RMD) landscape, extending tax deferral opportunities while accelerating distribution requirements for many beneficiaries.

For high-net-worth individuals and families, these changes are not merely technical. They require a reassessment of retirement income strategies, beneficiary planning, and the coordination of tax and estate objectives.

This article examines the current RMD framework and highlights key planning considerations under the updated rules.

Key Takeaways

  • SECURE 2.0 extends RMD starting ages but may increase future taxable distributions
  • Beneficiaries face compressed timelines for inherited retirement accounts.
  • Roth employer plan changes eliminate lifetime RMDs beginning in 2024
  • Coordinated tax and estate planning is essential under the current framework.

Who This Impacts

  • Individuals approaching RMD age
  • High-net-worth families
  • Beneficiaries of inherited IRAs
  • Business owners with retirement plans

SECURE 2.0 RMD Overview

Required minimum distributions are annual withdrawals that individuals with certain retirement accounts must take after reaching a specified age or inheriting such accounts. These rules are intended to ensure that tax-advantaged retirement accounts are used for retirement income rather than indefinite tax deferral or wealth transfer.

RMD requirements apply broadly to traditional IRAs, SEP and SIMPLE IRAs, and employer-sponsored plans such as 401(k) and 403(b) plans.

Legislative changes under the SECURE Act and SECURE 2.0 have extended the period of tax deferral during an individual’s lifetime while, in many cases, accelerating distribution requirements for beneficiaries.

Extended Deferral Period Creates Planning Opportunities

SECURE 2.0 increases the age at which individuals must begin taking RMDs. For individuals born between 1951 and 1959, RMDs begin at age 73. For those born in 1960 or later, the starting age increases to 75.

This extended deferral period allows retirement assets to grow on a tax-deferred basis for a longer period. At the same time, delaying distributions may result in larger account balances and correspondingly larger taxable withdrawals later in retirement.

Clients should consider how this dynamic may increase exposure to higher marginal tax rates and income-based thresholds in later years, making the timing of income recognition an important planning factor.

Distribution Timing Requires Careful Income Coordination

While the starting age for RMDs has been delayed, the timing rules remain unchanged. An individual’s first RMD must be taken by April 1 of the year following the year in which the applicable age is reached, with subsequent distributions required by December 31 each year.

This timing structure may result in two distributions occurring in the same tax year. Clients should consider how this may affect taxable income and overall tax planning strategies.

Reduced Penalties Do Not Eliminate Compliance Risk

SECURE 2.0 reduces the excise tax for failing to take a required distribution from 50% to 25% of the missed amount, with a potential reduction to 10% if corrected in a timely manner.

While this change provides relief in cases of inadvertent error, compliance remains important. Missed distributions must still be corrected, and appropriate filings must be made.

Roth Employer Plans Reshape Distribution Planning

Roth accounts in employer-sponsored plans are no longer subject to lifetime RMDs. This change aligns these accounts with Roth IRAs and eliminates the need for certain rollover strategies previously used to avoid required distributions.

As a result, clients should consider how Roth assets are positioned within their broader retirement and estate planning strategies, including their role in long-term tax planning strategies.

Inherited Accounts Increase Planning Complexity

The rules governing inherited retirement accounts continue to present planning challenges. In general, most non-spouse beneficiaries must fully distribute inherited accounts within ten years.

Recent guidance clarifies that where the original account holder had already begun taking RMDs, beneficiaries may also be required to take annual distributions during the ten-year period. Where the account holder had not yet reached RMD age, beneficiaries may defer distributions until the end of the tenth year.

Certain beneficiaries, including surviving spouses and disabled individuals, may continue to benefit from more favorable distribution options.

Compressed timelines can accelerate income recognition, and clients should consider how beneficiary designations and estate planning structures align with these requirements.

Key Planning Considerations Under SECURE 2.0

The current RMD framework underscores the importance of a coordinated approach to retirement and estate planning.

Clients should consider how the extended pre-RMD period may create opportunities for income management strategies. At the same time, the accelerated distribution requirements for beneficiaries highlight the need to review beneficiary designations and overall estate planning structures.

Aligning retirement distribution strategies with broader tax planning and estate objectives remains a central consideration under the updated rules.

How We Can Help

The SECURE 2.0 Act reshapes the RMD framework by offering increased flexibility during an account holder’s lifetime while imposing more structured distribution requirements on beneficiaries.

At Scarinci Hollenbeck, our Tax attorneys and Trusts & Estates attorneys work together to deliver coordinated planning strategies tailored to each client’s financial and family objectives. We assist clients in evaluating how the current RMD regulations affect their circumstances to develop strategies aligned with long-term goals.

No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC, LLC

Related Posts

See all
Navigating Director and Officer Liability in Times of Financial Distress post image

Navigating Director and Officer Liability in Times of Financial Distress

Director and officer liability increases sharply when a company is in financial distress. Decisions that would draw little attention in a healthy business can later be challenged by creditors, shareholders, bankruptcy trustees, and regulators as breaches of fiduciary duty, fraudulent transfers, or oversight failures. Understanding where that exposure comes from, and how to manage it, […]

Author: Michael Mietlicki

Link to post with title - "Navigating Director and Officer Liability in Times of Financial Distress"
Before You Buy: Managing Real Estate and Permitting Risk for BESS Projects in New York and New Jersey post image

Before You Buy: Managing Real Estate and Permitting Risk for BESS Projects in New York and New Jersey

For developers pursuing battery energy storage system (BESS) projects, finding the right property is only the beginning. BESS site selection is as much a legal and transactional exercise as a real estate decision, with risk analysis central to the project’s ultimate success. Key Takeaways The core questions for BESS site selection in New York and […]

Author: Nicholas Wall

Link to post with title - "Before You Buy: Managing Real Estate and Permitting Risk for BESS Projects in New York and New Jersey"
What Business Owners Get Wrong Before Meeting a Litigation Attorney post image

What Business Owners Get Wrong Before Meeting a Litigation Attorney

What should you expect when meeting a litigation attorney about a business dispute? You should expect to describe the dispute in your own words, hand over the most important documents, flag any deadlines or immediate threats, and leave with a clearer picture of the problem, what information is still needed, and the likely next steps. […]

Author: Michael Mietlicki

Link to post with title - "What Business Owners Get Wrong Before Meeting a Litigation Attorney"
Arbitration vs. Litigation vs. Mediation: What New Jersey Businesses Should Know Before Signing a Contract post image

Arbitration vs. Litigation vs. Mediation: What New Jersey Businesses Should Know Before Signing a Contract

Arbitration resolves disputes privately before an arbitrator whose decision is usually final, while litigation resolves them in court with full rights of appeal. Whether a business ends up in arbitration or litigation is often decided when it signs the contract, long before any dispute arises. Key Takeaways When facing a contract dispute, carefully consider your […]

Author: Graham Staton

Link to post with title - "Arbitration vs. Litigation vs. Mediation: What New Jersey Businesses Should Know Before Signing a Contract"
Can You Own Part of a New Jersey Business Without a Written Agreement? post image

Can You Own Part of a New Jersey Business Without a Written Agreement?

Can you own part of a business in New Jersey without a written agreement? Yes, it is possible. Under New Jersey’s Uniform Partnership Act, a partnership can arise when two or more people carry on a business as co-owners for profit, whether or not they ever intended to form one. Ownership doesn’t necessarily depend on […]

Author: Michael Mietlicki

Link to post with title - "Can You Own Part of a New Jersey Business Without a Written Agreement?"
Crisis-Proofing Your New Jersey Business: Building a Crisis Response Plan Before You Need One post image

Crisis-Proofing Your New Jersey Business: Building a Crisis Response Plan Before You Need One

For New Jersey businesses, crisis preparedness should be viewed as a legal and operational function, not simply an emergency-management exercise. A well-designed crisis response plan can help preserve evidence, protect confidential communications, meet reporting obligations, limit unnecessary exposure, and prevent an already difficult situation from becoming a larger legal problem. Key Takeaways A serious crisis […]

Author: Sean M. Pena

Link to post with title - "Crisis-Proofing Your New Jersey Business: Building a Crisis Response Plan Before You Need One"

No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!

Explore What Matters Most to You.

Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.

Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.

Let`s get in touch!

* The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form. By providing a telephone number and submitting this form you are consenting to be contacted by SMS text message. Message & data rates may apply. Message frequency may vary. You can reply STOP to opt-out of further messaging.
“If you would like to submit a file, please email it directly to info@sh-law.com.

Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!