
Dan Brecher
Counsel
212-286-0747 dbrecher@sh-law.com
Counsel
212-286-0747 dbrecher@sh-law.com
Non-disclosure agreements (NDAs) remain a critical tool for protecting sensitive business information. However, New York NDA requirements have evolved, and businesses must ensure these agreements are carefully drafted to remain enforceable.
In a competitive market like New York City, NDAs are commonly used to protect proprietary information, client relationships, and strategic plans. At the same time, courts and regulators are increasingly scrutinizing how these agreements are used, particularly in employment-related contexts.
A non-disclosure agreement is a contract that requires one or more parties to protect confidential information shared during a business relationship.
NDAs are widely used across:
The purpose is consistent: to prevent the misuse or disclosure of sensitive information. However, under New York NDA requirements, these agreements must be narrowly tailored to protect legitimate business interests.
While NDAs should be customized for each situation, most agreements include several core provisions:
Generic templates often fail to reflect New York NDA requirements, making regular review and customization essential.
New York courts generally enforce NDAs that are reasonable in scope and duration.
Agreements are more likely to be upheld when they:
Courts are less likely to enforce NDAs that attempt to restrict disclosure of information that is public, widely known, or unrelated to competitive harm.
New York law also limits the use of NDAs in certain contexts. For example, agreements cannot prevent individuals from reporting unlawful conduct or participating in government investigations. Statutory restrictions also apply to NDAs in settlement agreements involving discrimination, harassment, or retaliation claims.
NDAs and non-compete agreements serve different purposes, but the distinction is increasingly important.
If an NDA is drafted too broadly, it may function as a de facto non-compete. In those cases, courts may decline to enforce the agreement. Businesses should ensure that NDAs focus on protecting sensitive information rather than restricting lawful competition.
Overly broad or outdated agreements can create significant risk.
Potential issues include:
An unenforceable NDA may also create a false sense of security, leaving sensitive information effectively unprotected.
To be enforceable, an NDA must protect a legitimate business interest and be reasonable in scope and duration. Under New York NDA requirements, courts will not uphold agreements that are overly broad or attempt to restrict disclosure of information that is public or not competitively sensitive.
No. New York law prohibits NDAs from restricting individuals from reporting unlawful conduct, cooperating with government investigations, or participating in regulatory proceedings. Agreements that attempt to impose these limitations are unlikely to be enforceable.
The duration of an NDA must be reasonable and tied to the nature of the information being protected. While trade secrets may justify longer or indefinite protection, most business information is subject to more limited timeframes under New York NDA requirements.
An NDA protects confidential information, while a non-compete restricts a person’s ability to work for competitors. If an NDA is drafted too broadly, it may be treated as a non-compete and may not be enforced under New York law.
Non-disclosure agreements remain an essential tool for protecting sensitive business information, but they must be carefully structured to comply with New York NDA requirements.
If you have any questions about how to best protect your confidential business information or need assistance drafting a nondisclosure agreement, we encourage you to contact a member of Scarinci Hollenbeck’s Corporate Transactions & Business Law Group.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

For battery energy storage system (BESS) developers, securing equipment and site control is only part of the development equation. A project must also connect to the electric grid, and increasingly, BESS interconnection is one of the biggest sources of schedule, cost, and contractual risk. Key Takeaways This article is Part 3 of our Battery Storage […]
Author: Nicholas Wall

Director and officer liability increases sharply when a company is in financial distress. Decisions that would draw little attention in a healthy business can later be challenged by creditors, shareholders, bankruptcy trustees, and regulators as breaches of fiduciary duty, fraudulent transfers, or oversight failures. Understanding where that exposure comes from, and how to manage it, […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki

For developers pursuing battery energy storage system (BESS) projects, finding the right property is only the beginning. BESS site selection is as much a legal and transactional exercise as a real estate decision, with risk analysis central to the project’s ultimate success. Key Takeaways The core questions for BESS site selection in New York and […]
Author: Nicholas Wall

What should you expect when meeting a litigation attorney about a business dispute? You should expect to describe the dispute in your own words, hand over the most important documents, flag any deadlines or immediate threats, and leave with a clearer picture of the problem, what information is still needed, and the likely next steps. […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki

Arbitration resolves disputes privately before an arbitrator whose decision is usually final, while litigation resolves them in court with full rights of appeal. Whether a business ends up in arbitration or litigation is often decided when it signs the contract, long before any dispute arises. Key Takeaways When facing a contract dispute, carefully consider your […]
Author: Graham Staton

Can you own part of a business in New Jersey without a written agreement? Yes, it is possible. Under New Jersey’s Uniform Partnership Act, a partnership can arise when two or more people carry on a business as co-owners for profit, whether or not they ever intended to form one. Ownership doesn’t necessarily depend on […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!