Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Buffalo Bills Cheerleaders Sue NFL Over Harsh Work Conditions
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Date: May 5, 2014
Key Contacts
Back
Lawsuits by NFL cheerleaders against the organization seem to be a growing trend.
The latest plaintiff(s), the Buffalo Jills – cheerleaders for the Buffalo Bills organization, recently filed a lawsuit against the franchise claiming they worked hundreds of hours without pay and were subjected to harsh work conditions.
According to the Los Angeles Times, the cheerleaders said they were groped and targeted with sexual comments in addition to not being compensated for work. The Jills have decided to cease operations.
“If they cease operations, they will blame the lawsuit for the destruction of the Jills, when that was not intended at all,” Lawyer Frank Dolce told the Associated Press. “We love the Bills. We love the Jills. We do not love the travesty of its management that has occurred over the last few years.”
Consequences
If the allegations are proven true, the Bills organization could be in trouble, as it would have violated multiple laws. According to the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission it is unlawful to harass a person because of that person’s sex, especially if the harassment creates a hostile or offensive work environment, which is what the Jills allege. The harasser can be a supervisor, a co-worker or someone who is not an employee of the employer.
The Bills organization could also be found in violation of U.S. wage laws. Employers are required to provide compensation that amounts to – at least – the federal minimum wage of $7.25 per hour. If it is true the Jills were not paid, the organization would be in direct violation of this law.
In the past couple of months, cheerleaders from the Oakland Raiders and Cincinnati Bengals had similar claims, so it will be interesting to see if any other groups come out with allegations in the future.
- Industries: Entertainment & Media
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Related Posts
See all
Rule 26 Expert Discovery: When an Expert Witness Uses AI, Is It Discoverable?
Case law following the 2010 amendments to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26 offers guidance on how courts are likely to address whether an expert witness’s AI records are subject to discovery. Key Takeaways Rule 26 Expert Discovery After the 2010 Amendments This article addresses the question courts and lawyers have faced in recent cases: […]
Author: Chris Seelinger
How Expert Witness AI Use Ends Up in Discovery
“Show how 3M is 0% at fault.” The absurd tale of how a 350-page ChatGPT history for 3M’s expert witness was produced during a deposition is more likely than you think. It’s an inevitable trend, and an unsettled question for federal courts as experts make generative AI part of their workflow. Key Takeaways Expert Witness […]
Author: Chris Seelinger
The Screenshot Problem: Why Nothing Is Really Private Anymore
Screenshots have changed the risks of electronic communications. The screenshot problem is that messages intended for one person or a small group can be copied, forwarded, preserved, and ultimately presented to opposing counsel, regulators, journalists, customers, or a jury. Businesses should recognize that a truly private digital conversation is increasingly unreliable and ensure their policies, […]
Author: Sean M. Pena
BESS Project Agreements: Allocating Risk Among Developers, EPC Contractors, and Equipment Suppliers
Developers, engineering, procurement, and construction (EPC) contractors, and equipment suppliers each play a critical role in completing a BESS project. However, when equipment costs rise, deliveries are delayed, or regulations change, determining who bears the financial consequences can become contentious. Well-drafted project agreements are essential to sound risk allocation. Key Takeaways This article is Part […]
Author: Nicholas Wall
IP Infringement: What Steps Can You Take If You're Affected?
IP infringement occurs when someone uses your intellectual property without your permission or beyond the scope of the permission you granted. Common examples of IP infringement include copying a product’s patented features or using a trademarked logo in a way that is likely to confuse consumers about the source or affiliation of goods or services. […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki
Public Allegations, Unfinished Investigation: What New Jersey Businesses Should Do Next
When facing public allegations of wrongdoing, companies should not let the speed of the public conversation dictate the speed of an investigation. An investigation designed to confirm a preferred narrative rather than establish the facts can create serious problems later, particularly if litigation, regulatory scrutiny, or employment claims follow. Key Takeaways When public allegations surface […]
Author: Sean M. Pena
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.