
Fred D. Zemel
Partner
201-896-7065 fzemel@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Fred D. Zemel
Date: September 25, 2015

Partner
201-896-7065 fzemel@sh-law.comThe art of the trademark scam flourishes in large part because information about trademark registrants is publicly available online. Scammers use this information, along with official intellectual property terms, to create official looking documents intended to trick individuals and companies into paying erroneous fees and/or signing up for services that they don’t need.

In recent years, the scams have not only become more prevalent, but also more sophisticated. In many cases, the fraudulent letters and e-mails closely resemble official government communications and invoices and lack the common spelling errors, grammatical mistakes, and misuse of legal terminology that frequently tip off recipients to spam and junk mail.
To increase the air of legitimacy, scammers typically use official sounding names that resemble the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), by including the terms “United States,” “U.S.,” “Trademark,” “Patent,” “Registration,” “Office,” or “Agency.” Companies also attempt to make their solicitations mimic the look and format of official government documents to plant the seeds of a trademark scam.
While the specific tactics of a trademark scam may vary, the overall goal is the same — convince the recipient to send money. Businesses may be asked to sign up for legal services; trademark monitoring services; recordation with U.S. Customs and Border Protection; and registration with the companies’ own private trademark registry.
The USPTO frequently posts warnings on its website with specific details of the scams. At last count, the agency listed more than 20 fraudulent solicitations that are currently circulating. They range from fake trademark expiration notices that purport to be from the USPTO to services that promise to search trademark applications for infringing content. To keep the list updated, the USPTO encourages recipients of fraudulent solicitations to e-mail the agency at TMFeedback@uspto.gov with a copy of the communication.
To avoid becoming the next victim, businesses are advised to red the “fine print” very carefully and raise any concerns with an experienced intellectual property attorney before enrolling in these services or sending any money.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

How the Updated Law Shapes Retirement and Estate Planning The SECURE 2.0 Act of 2022 materially reshapes the required minimum distribution (RMD) landscape, extending tax deferral opportunities while accelerating distribution requirements for many beneficiaries. For high-net-worth individuals and families, these changes are not merely technical. They require a reassessment of retirement income strategies, beneficiary planning, […]
Author: Marc J. Comer

Small businesses considering buying commercial property in New Jersey must evaluate a range of legal, financial, and operational factors. While ownership can offer long-term value and control, it also introduces significant risks if not properly structured. This guide outlines key considerations to help New Jersey business owners make informed decisions, minimize legal exposure, and successfully […]
Author: Robert L. Baker, Jr.

On January 28, 2026, staff of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission’s Divisions of Corporation Finance, Investment Management, and Trading and Markets issued a joint statement clarifying how existing federal securities laws apply to tokenized securities. The SEC’s “Statement on Tokenized Securities” does not establish new law, but it does provide greater clarity on the […]
Author: Dan Brecher

Operating a business in the New Jersey and New York City metropolitan region offers incredible opportunities, but it also requires navigating a dense and highly regulated legal environment. From entity formation to regulatory compliance, seemingly minor legal oversights can expose business owners to significant risk. In our work with businesses throughout the region, our attorneys […]
Author: Dan Brecher

High-profile founder litigation is more than just a media spectacle. For startup founders, these cases underscore the legal and structural risks that can arise when rapid growth outpaces formal oversight. While launching a new company can be both an exciting and deeply rewarding endeavor, founders must be mindful that it also comes with significant risks. […]
Author: Dan Brecher

Every New Jersey company should periodically evaluate its governance framework. Strong corporate governance protects directors and officers, builds investor confidence, reduces litigation exposure, and positions a company for sustainable growth. The first quarter of the year is a great time to evaluate your corporate governance practices and perform any routine maintenance needed to keep that […]
Author: Ken Hollenbeck
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!