The Trump Administration Recently Announced a New Policy That Aims to Deregulate the Commercial Space Industry
President Donald Trump’s initiatives to remove regulatory roadblocks go all the way to the final frontier. The Trump Administration recently announced a new policy that aims to deregulate the commercial space industry.
The global space economy is closing in on $350 billion and is expected to become a multitrillion-dollar industry. It’s not all about traveling to Mars or creating a moon colony, commercial space opportunities include space tourism, mining, and satellite communications.
In 2010, President Barack Obama announced a new national space policy, which focused on encouraging and facilitating the growth of a U.S. commercial space sector. However, as countries across the globe strive to win the latest “space race,” the privately funded U.S. space industry maintains that it is still being hampered by federal regulations that have failed to evolve with technology.
Further assistance may be forthcoming. Since taking office President Trump has signaled that the U.S. space industry is a priority. Last June, President Trump signed an Executive Order reconvening the National Space Council for the first time in 24 years. On December 11, 2017, he signed Space Policy Directive-1, which directed the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) to return American astronauts to the Moon with the ultimate goal of establishing human missions to Mars.
Space Policy Directive 2
On May 24, 2018, President Trump signed Space Policy Directive-2 (SPD-2), which reflects recommendations made to the President by the National Space Council. Among other mandates, SPD-2 directs the Secretary of Transportation to establish a new regulatory system for managing launch and re-entry activity. The new rules must specifically “consider requiring a single license for all types of commercial space flight launch and re-entry operations and replacing prescriptive requirements in the process with performance-based criteria.”
Space Policy Directive 2 directs Secretary of Commerce Wilbur Ross Jr. to “transmit a plan to create a ‘one-stop shop’ within the Department of Commerce for administering and regulating commercial space flight activities.” In a recent op-ed in the New York Times, Ross highlighted the benefits of consolidating federal oversight.
“At my department alone, there are six bureaus involved in the space industry. A unified departmental office for business needs will enable better coordination of space-related activities,” Ross wrote. “When companies seek guidance on launching satellites, the Space Administration will be able to address an array of space activities, including remote sensing, economic development, data-purchase policies, GPS, spectrum policy, trade promotion, standards and technology and space-traffic management.”
Under SPD-2, federal agencies are also directed to submit a report to President Trump on “improving global competitiveness of United States space radio frequency spectrum policies, regulation, and activities at the International Telecommunication Union and other multilateral forums.” In addition, the Directive requires the National Space Council to review export licensing regulations affecting commercial space flight activity and deliver recommendations to the President within 180 days.
What’s Next?
The Trump Administration’s latest policy directive is a step in the right direction. However, more must be done for the U.S. commercial space industry to reach its full potential, including additional measures to modernize and streamline federal regulations. For many of these reforms, Congress must also get involved.
If you have any questions or if you would like to discuss the matter further, please contact me, Jason A. LaBerteaux, or the Scarinci Hollenbeck attorney with whom you work, at 201-806-3364.
Business Mediation: An Overview and Practical Tips
Business mediation is a confidential, voluntary process in which a neutral third party helps companies negotiate a resolution to a commercial dispute without going to trial. Because working with a mediator is very different from litigating in the courtroom, it is important to understand how commercial mediation works, when it makes sense for your dispute, […]
Top 5 Causes Leading to Construction Defect Litigation
The five most common causes of construction defect litigation are design defects, substandard materials, workmanship defects, code violations, and subsurface defects. Because these flaws can compromise a building’s integrity, functionality, or safety, they frequently lead to disputes involving multiple parties and high financial stakes. Key takeaways: What is Construction Defect Litigation? Construction litigation is complex, […]
How to Protect Your New Jersey Business When Going through a Divorce
The most effective ways to protect your business in a divorce are put in place before one begins: a prenuptial or postnuptial agreement, clean separation of business and personal finances, and divorce contingencies built into your operating or buy-sell agreements. If divorce is already underway, the priorities shift to establishing how the business is classified […]
The most common franchise disputes involve breach of contract, franchise termination and non-renewal, intellectual property rights, territorial encroachment, royalty and fee payments, franchisor support obligations, and violations of state franchise laws such as the New Jersey Franchise Practices Act. Franchisors and franchisees can often resolve these conflicts by providing written notice detailing the dispute and […]
Reputational Risk and Legal Exposure: Why New Jersey Businesses Must Manage Them Together
New Jersey businesses must manage legal and reputational risk together because modern disputes play out on two fronts at once: the legal proceeding itself and the court of public opinion, where customers, employees, investors, and business partners often reach conclusions long before a judge or jury has had the opportunity to evaluate the facts. Success […]
Eviction Is Not Always the End: Understanding Post-Possession Rent Claims in New Jersey and New York
No. An eviction does not automatically end a tenant’s obligation to pay rent. Post-eviction rent claims are common because recovering possession resolves who has the right to occupy the premises, but it does not extinguish the tenant’s contractual obligations under the lease. Whether unpaid or future rent remains owed depends on three factors: the lease’s […]
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!
