New Jersey lawmakers are hoping to lure cryptocurrency businesses away from neighboring New York City with more business-friendly regulations for digital asset transactions.
New Jersey lawmakers are hoping to lure cryptocurrency businesses away from neighboring New York City with more business-friendly regulations for digital asset transactions. According to its sponsors, the Digital Asset and Blockchain Technology Act would regulate cryptocurrency without stifling innovation.
“New Jersey is a hub of innovation and, with this bill, we can lead the nation in providing thoughtful regulation to the industry,” said sponsor Assemblywoman Yvonne Lopez. The Digital Asset and Blockchain Technology Act was advanced by the Assembly’s Science, Innovation, and Technology Committee and the State Senate’s Commerce Committee in March.
States Increasingly Regulating Crypto in Absence of Federal Regulations
While regulators at the federal and state level are increasing their oversight over Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies, there are still very few clear rules for businesses to follow, which many argue is hampering the industry’s growth. At the same time, consumer advocates maintain that the volatile industry needs greater protections for investors.
States that have adopted regulations governing cryptocurrency have taken vastly different approaches. New York was one of the first states in the country to enact a regulatory framework for virtual currency like Bitcoin. Under regulations enacted in 2015, businesses must obtain a license, commonly referred to as a “BitLicense,” prior to engaging in any virtual currency business activity.
While New York was applauded by many for bringing oversight to the growing crypto marketplace, its regulatory scheme is increasingly coming under fire for being too burdensome, particularly for startups and other small businesses. According to sponsors of New Jersey’s Digital Asset and Blockchain Technology Act, New Jersey has the opportunity to attract crypto businesses to the State by crafting regulations that strike a better balance between fostering innovation and protecting investors. “Through the issuance of licensing for businesses that choose to use blockchain technology, the state will be able to develop a 21st century economy and grow a new and exciting business sector while protecting New Jerseyans from the potential harm,” said Senate sponsor Andrew Zwicker.
Key Provisions of New Jersey’s Digital Asset and Blockchain Technology Act
The Digital Asset and Blockchain Technology Act defines “digital asset” to mean a representation of economic, proprietary, or access rights that is stored in a machine-readable format, has a transaction history that is recorded in a distributed, digital ledger or digital data structure in which consensus is achieved through a mathematically verifiable process. “Digital assets” would not include securities, whether in digital form or otherwise, as defined under state and federal securities regulations.
Required License
Under the Digital Asset and Blockchain Technology Act, a person may not engage in a digital asset business activity, or hold itself out as being able to engage in a digital asset business activity, with or on behalf of a New Jersey resident unless the person is licensed by the Department of Banking and Insurance (Department), or has filed a pending license with the Department.
Under the proposed bill, the Department may license a person to carry on one or more of the following digital asset business activities:
Receiving a digital asset for transmission or transmitting a digital asset, except where the transaction is undertaken for non-financial purposes and does not involve the transfer of more than a nominal amount of a digital asset;
Storing, holding, or maintaining custody of a digital asset on behalf of others, exempting all custodians otherwise regulated as a bank, trust, broker-dealer, or credit union in any state or by the United States, or money transmitter licensed in New Jersey;
Buying and selling digital assets as a customer business;
Performing exchange services of digital assets as a customer business;
Issuing a digital asset; or
Borrowing or lending of, or facilitating the borrowing or lending of, customer digital assets.
The legislation provides that an application for a license must be submitted through the Nationwide Multistate Licensing System, and made in the form and medium to be prescribed by the Department in regulations. Applicants must provide certain information relevant to the applicant’s proposed digital asset business activity, as well as information regarding key individuals responsible for establishing or directing policies and procedures of the licensee. The bill further provides that no license may be issued by the Department to an individual who has, within the five years preceding the submission of an application for a license, been convicted of embezzlement, forgery, fraud, or theft. The Department would be required to grant or deny any digital asset business license application or license reciprocity application within 120 days of its receipt.
The Digital Asset and Blockchain Technology Act further provides that the Department may audit any digital asset business licensee. Additionally, each licensee must maintain and enforce confidential, written compliance policies which are to be reviewed and approved by the licensee’s board of directors or an equivalent governing body. The Department may suspend or revoke a digital asset business license upon certain findings provided in the bill.
Mandatory Disclosures
The Digital Asset and Blockchain Technology Act requires the terms and conditions of a digital asset business involving a consumer’s account to be disclosed at the time the consumer contracts for a digital asset business service. The disclosure must be full and complete, contain no material misrepresentations, be in readily understandable language and may include, as appropriate and to the extent applicable, certain information concerning fees and charges, risks to the consumer, and any protections or securities that are in place.
The mandatory disclosures required under the bill must be displayed and individually agreed to by a consumer before any digital asset transaction at an electronic kiosk. Any fee to be charged is required to be displayed and individually agreed to by a consumer before any digital asset transaction or digital asset balance inquiry at an electronic kiosk.
If you have any questions or if you would like to discuss the matter further, please contact me, Jeff Pittard, or the Scarinci Hollenbeck attorney with whom you work, at 201-896-4100.
Top 5 Causes Leading to Construction Defect Litigation
The five most common causes of construction defect litigation are design defects, substandard materials, workmanship defects, code violations, and subsurface defects. Because these flaws can compromise a building’s integrity, functionality, or safety, they frequently lead to disputes involving multiple parties and high financial stakes. Key takeaways: What is Construction Defect Litigation? Construction litigation is complex, […]
How to Protect Your New Jersey Business When Going through a Divorce
The most effective ways to protect your business in a divorce are put in place before one begins: a prenuptial or postnuptial agreement, clean separation of business and personal finances, and divorce contingencies built into your operating or buy-sell agreements. If divorce is already underway, the priorities shift to establishing how the business is classified […]
The most common franchise disputes involve breach of contract, franchise termination and non-renewal, intellectual property rights, territorial encroachment, royalty and fee payments, franchisor support obligations, and violations of state franchise laws such as the New Jersey Franchise Practices Act. Franchisors and franchisees can often resolve these conflicts by providing written notice detailing the dispute and […]
Reputational Risk and Legal Exposure: Why New Jersey Businesses Must Manage Them Together
New Jersey businesses must manage legal and reputational risk together because modern disputes play out on two fronts at once: the legal proceeding itself and the court of public opinion, where customers, employees, investors, and business partners often reach conclusions long before a judge or jury has had the opportunity to evaluate the facts. Success […]
Eviction Is Not Always the End: Understanding Post-Possession Rent Claims in New Jersey and New York
No. An eviction does not automatically end a tenant’s obligation to pay rent. Post-eviction rent claims are common because recovering possession resolves who has the right to occupy the premises, but it does not extinguish the tenant’s contractual obligations under the lease. Whether unpaid or future rent remains owed depends on three factors: the lease’s […]
Company Dissolved? Legal and Financial Consequences to Expect
A company is dissolved; legally, it ceases to exist. Accordingly, dissolution results in significant legal and financial consequences. It is a process that must be properly managed to avoid continuing liability. The Corporate Dissolution Process Corporate dissolution is the legal process of formally closing a corporation, paying its debts and distributing the remaining assets. Most […]
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!
