Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Can You Enforce an Arbitration Clause on the Other Side Just Before Trial?
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Date: May 10, 2013
Key Contacts
Back
The Supreme Court of New Jersey recently considered how late is “too late” to invoke an arbitration clause in a contract. The court accepted the case after lower courts reached opposing opinions of the issue.
In the recently decided Cole v. Jersey City Medical Center, the defendant waited until three days before trial to invoke its right to proceed to arbitration. The arbitration clause at issue was included in an employment agreement with the plaintiff, Karen Cole. The agreement provided, in pertinent part, that, “any claim, controversy or dispute between you and [the employer] . . . arising out of or relating to your employment, the cessation of your employment, or any matter relating to the foregoing . . . shall be submitted to and settled by arbitration . . . .”
Cole was hired by Liberty Anesthesia Associates, LLC (Liberty) to work as a Certified Registered Nurse Anesthetist at the Jersey City Medical Center (Medical Center). After refusing to submit to a drug test, her employment was terminated. Cole filed suit against the Medical Center alleging retaliation in violation of the Conscientious Employee Protection Act, among other claims. She later added Liberty as a defendant, and asserted many of the same claims.
After discovery was completed, Liberty and the Medical Center filed motions for summary judgment. Cole settled with the Medical Center, and the court ultimately dismissed several claims against Liberty. It then set a trial date of March 22, 2010 for the remaining claims.
Three days before trial, Liberty filed a motion to compel arbitration. Cole objected on the basis that Liberty had failed to raise the clause as a required affirmative defense and had willingly participated in the litigation for several years. Liberty explained that it did not raise the arbitration issue earlier because an arbitrator might have reached a different result than a jury if the claims against Liberty proceeded to trial and the nearly identical claims against the Medical Center proceeded in court.
The trial court granted Liberty’s motion and dismissed the case but the Appellate Division reversed. The state Supreme Court will now take on the issue of whether Liberty waived its right to arbitration. We will be closely watching this case and will provide a discussion of the decision as soon as it is published.
If you have any questions about this case or would like to discuss the legal issues involved, please contact me or the Scarinci Hollenbeck attorney with whom you work.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Related Posts
See all
Does Your Homeowners Insurance Provide Adequate Coverage?
Your home is likely your greatest asset, which is why it is so important to adequately protect it. Homeowners insurance protects you from the financial costs of unforeseen losses, such as theft, fire, and natural disasters, by helping you rebuild and replace possessions that were lost While the definition of “adequate” coverage depends upon a […]
Author: Jesse M. Dimitro
Understanding the Importance of a Non-Contingent Offer
Making a non-contingent offer can dramatically increase your chances of securing a real estate transaction, particularly in competitive markets like New York City. However, buyers should understand that waiving contingencies, including those related to financing, or appraisals, also comes with significant risks. Determining your best strategy requires careful analysis of the property, the market, and […]
Author: Jesse M. Dimitro
Fred D. Zemel Appointed Chair of Strategic Planning at Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC
Business Transactional Attorney Zemel to Spearhead Strategic Initiatives for Continued Growth and Innovation Little Falls, NJ – February 21, 2025 – Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC is pleased to announce that Partner Fred D. Zemel has been named Chair of the firm’s Strategic Planning Committee. In this role, Mr. Zemel will lead the committee in identifying, […]
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Novation Agreement Process: Step-by-Step Guide for Businesses
Big changes sometimes occur during the life cycle of a contract. Cancelling a contract outright can be bad for your reputation and your bottom line. Businesses need to know how to best address a change in circumstances, while also protecting their legal rights. One option is to transfer the “benefits and the burdens” of a […]
Author: Dan Brecher
What Is a Trade Secret? Key Elements and Legal Protections Explained
What is a trade secret and why you you protect them? Technology has made trade secret theft even easier and more prevalent. In fact, businesses lose billions of dollars every year due to trade secret theft committed by employees, competitors, and even foreign governments. But what is a trade secret? And how do you protect […]
Author: Ronald S. Bienstock
What Is Title Insurance? Safeguarding Against Title Defects
If you are considering the purchase of a property, you may wonder — what is title insurance, do I need it, and why do I need it? Even seasoned property owners may question if the added expense and extra paperwork is really necessary, especially considering that people and entities insured by title insurance make fewer […]
Author: Patrick T. Conlon
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Can You Enforce an Arbitration Clause on the Other Side Just Before Trial?
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Supreme Court of New Jersey recently considered how late is “too late” to invoke an arbitration clause in a contract. The court accepted the case after lower courts reached opposing opinions of the issue.
In the recently decided Cole v. Jersey City Medical Center, the defendant waited until three days before trial to invoke its right to proceed to arbitration. The arbitration clause at issue was included in an employment agreement with the plaintiff, Karen Cole. The agreement provided, in pertinent part, that, “any claim, controversy or dispute between you and [the employer] . . . arising out of or relating to your employment, the cessation of your employment, or any matter relating to the foregoing . . . shall be submitted to and settled by arbitration . . . .”
Cole was hired by Liberty Anesthesia Associates, LLC (Liberty) to work as a Certified Registered Nurse Anesthetist at the Jersey City Medical Center (Medical Center). After refusing to submit to a drug test, her employment was terminated. Cole filed suit against the Medical Center alleging retaliation in violation of the Conscientious Employee Protection Act, among other claims. She later added Liberty as a defendant, and asserted many of the same claims.
After discovery was completed, Liberty and the Medical Center filed motions for summary judgment. Cole settled with the Medical Center, and the court ultimately dismissed several claims against Liberty. It then set a trial date of March 22, 2010 for the remaining claims.
Three days before trial, Liberty filed a motion to compel arbitration. Cole objected on the basis that Liberty had failed to raise the clause as a required affirmative defense and had willingly participated in the litigation for several years. Liberty explained that it did not raise the arbitration issue earlier because an arbitrator might have reached a different result than a jury if the claims against Liberty proceeded to trial and the nearly identical claims against the Medical Center proceeded in court.
The trial court granted Liberty’s motion and dismissed the case but the Appellate Division reversed. The state Supreme Court will now take on the issue of whether Liberty waived its right to arbitration. We will be closely watching this case and will provide a discussion of the decision as soon as it is published.
If you have any questions about this case or would like to discuss the legal issues involved, please contact me or the Scarinci Hollenbeck attorney with whom you work.