
James F. McDonough
Of Counsel
732-568-8360 jmcdonough@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: James F. McDonough
Date: October 22, 2014

Of Counsel
732-568-8360 jmcdonough@sh-law.comAccording to NewsObserver.com, the commission has ruled that the state’s utilities can continue to charge their customers for a corporate tax rate higher than the rate that they actually pay. This decision has introduced strong tensions between the commission’s Democratic minority – who controlled the commission for years – and a Republican majority recently put into place by Gov. Pat McCrory.
In a 4-3 decision, the commission ruled that North Carolina utilities can continue to charge consumers for a corporate income tax of 6.9 percent, despite the fact that the state’s corporate income tax was recently lowered to 5 percent by state legislature, the news source reported. Utility companies are allowed to pocket the difference.
“There is no set end to this over-collection, which will continue indefinitely each year until each utility’s next general rate case,” the commission’s three Democrats wrote in their dissent, according to the news source. “Even then, ratepayers will never be refunded the over-collected funds; the utilities have simply been afforded an unearned gain at the expense of North Carolina ratepayers.”
Utility Dive reported that the state’s utilities would be able to over-collect approximately $21 million per year based on the ruling. Ratepayers’ average electric bills would increase by about 1 percent and average natural gas bills would increase by between 3 and 4 percent.
The majority wrote in their decision that the amounts considered are too small to require a change, according to NewsObserver.com. Duke Energy Carolinas and Duke Energy Progress are two companies opting to pass the savings on to consumers. They noted, however, that their customers would likely only pay 9 cents more and 17 cents more per month extra, respectively.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

The application of traditional federal securities laws to crypto assets continues to evolve. In some cases, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) considers tokens and other digital assets to be securities. This makes them subject to federal securities law, including the Securities Act of 1933 and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. This classification has […]
Author: Bryce S. Robins

While the New York City real estate market can be extremely competitive, moving too quickly often backfires. Before purchasing a condominium or cooperative in New York City, it is important to do you homework. Purchasing property in NYC can involve a dizzying number of legal issues. These include condo and co-op rules, rent restrictions, and […]
Author: Jesse M. Dimitro

Smart contracts feature a unique blend of legal agreement and technical code. This innovation has the potential to reshape how business is conducted. At the same time, smart contract legal issues around enforceability, jurisdiction, identity, and compliance are common. The legal framework for these self-executing agreements is still evolving. What Are Smart Contracts? Smart contracts, […]
Author: Bryce S. Robins

Retaining top talent continues to be one of the greatest challenges facing employers today. Even in an employer’s market, the loss of a key employee can disrupt operations and result in significant costs. While compensation plays a role, long-term retention often depends on workplace culture, communication, and employee engagement. One increasingly popular strategy for improving […]
Author: Angela A. Turiano

Secured transactions form the backbone of a wide range of business dealings, including business loans, mortgages, and inventory financing. Because the stakes are often high and relatively minor oversights can have drastic consequences, lenders and borrowers should thoroughly understand how to form an enforceable security agreement that protects their legal rights. What Is a Secured […]
Author: Dan Brecher

Cashing a check marked “paid in full” can be a risky endeavor, particularly if you don’t fully understanding the legal implications. If you are owed more than the amount of the check you accept and deposit, you may waive your right to collect the full disputed amount. That is why you should consider either rejecting […]
Author: Dan Brecher
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!