Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC, LLCScarinci Hollenbeck, LLC, LLC

Firm Insights

OSHA Unveils COVID-19 Vaccination and Testing Rule – What Employers Need to Know

Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC

Date: November 10, 2021

Key Contacts

Back

Back in September, President Biden directed the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) to develop a rule requiring that all employers with 100 or more employees to require vaccination or, as an alternative, weekly testing…

Back in September, President Biden directed the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) to develop a rule requiring that all employers with 100 or more employees to require vaccination or, as an alternative, weekly testing. On November 4, 2021, the U.S. Department of Labor finally published the emergency temporary standard (ETS) implementing the Biden Administration’s mandate. The ETS also requires that these employers provide paid time for employees to get vaccinated and recover from vaccination side effects, and mandates that all unvaccinated workers wear a face mask in the workplace. 

According to the DOL, the ETS will cover two-thirds of the nation’s private-sector workforce. “While vaccination remains the most effective and efficient defense against COVID-19, this emergency temporary standard will protect all workers, including those who remain unvaccinated, by requiring regular testing and the use of face coverings by unvaccinated workers to prevent the spread of the virus,” Deputy Assistant Secretary of Labor for Occupational Safety and Health Jim Frederick said in a press statement. “As part of OSHA’s mission to protect the safety and health of workers, this rule will provide a roadmap to help businesses keep their workers safe.”

When is the ETS effective? – Compliance Deadlines

The ETS took effect immediately upon its publication in the Federal Register. Employers must comply with most requirements within 30 days of publication and with testing requirements within 60 days of publication.

That means that the testing requirement for unvaccinated workers takes effect January 4, 2022. Employers must be in compliance with all other requirements – such as providing paid time for employees to get vaccinated and enforcing masking for unvaccinated workers – on or before December 5, 2021.

Which employers are covered by the ETS?

The ETS applies to employers with 100 or more employees.

How does the ETS interact with other vaccine mandates?

On November 4, 2021, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) at the Department of Health and Human Services also published a rule implementing its requirement that health care workers at facilities participating in Medicare and Medicaid be fully vaccinated. The rule applies to employees regardless of whether their positions are clinical or non-clinical and includes employees, students, trainees, and volunteers who work at a covered facility that receives federal funding from Medicare or Medicaid. 

OSHA has clarified that it will not apply its new ETS to workplaces covered by either the CMS rule or the federal contractor vaccination requirement. This is good news as it means employers won’t have to track multiple vaccination requirements for the same employees. OSHA also emphasized that its new rules preempt any inconsistent state or local laws, including laws that ban or limit an employer’s authority to require vaccination, masks, or testing.

Which employees count towards the 100-employee count?

In determining the number of employees, employers must include all employees across all of their U.S. locations, regardless of employees’ vaccination status or where they perform their work. Part-time employees do count towards the company total, but independent contractors do not.

Which employees are required to adhere to the ETS?

Even where the standard applies to a particular employer, its requirements may not apply to certain employees. The ETS establishes exceptions for employees (i) who do not report to a workplace where other individuals such as coworkers or customers are present; (ii) while working from home; or (iii) who work exclusively outdoors.

Should employers exclude employees who fall under the above exceptions from their employee counts?

No.
The ETS provides that the determination as to whether a particular employer is covered by the standard should be made separately from whether individual employees are covered by the standard’s requirements. OSHA provides the following examples:

  • If an employer has 75 part-time employees and 25 full-time employees, the employer would be within the scope of this ETS because it has 100 employees.
  • If an employer has 150 employees, 100 of whom work from their homes full-time and 50 of whom work in the office at least part of the time, the employer would be within the scope of this ETS because it has more than 100 employees.
  • If an employer has 102 employees and only 3 ever report to an office location, that employer would be covered.
  • If an employer has 200 employees, all of whom are vaccinated, that employer would be covered.
  • If an employer has 125 employees, and 115 of them work exclusively outdoors, that employer would be covered.

What does the ETS require?

A. Mandatory Vaccination Policy

Under the ETS, employers must establish, implement, and enforce a written mandatory vaccination policy. The policy must require vaccination of all employees, including vaccination of all new employees as soon as practicable.

In FAQs published by OSHA in conjunction with the ETS, OSHA advises that vaccination policies should include:

  • Requirements for COVID-19 vaccination;
  • Applicable exclusions from the written policy (e.g., medical contraindications, medical necessity requiring delay in vaccination, or reasonable accommodations for workers with disabilities or sincerely held religious beliefs);
  • Information on determining an employee’s vaccination status and how this information will be collected;
  • Paid time and sick leave for vaccination purposes;
  • Notification of positive COVID-19 tests and removal of COVID-19 positive employees from the workplace;
  • Information to be provided to employees, e.g., how the employer is making that information available to employees; and
  • Disciplinary action for employees who do not abide by the policy.

OSHA further advises that the employer should include all relevant information regarding the policy’s effective date, who the policy applies to, deadlines (e.g., for submitting vaccination information, for getting vaccinated), and procedures for compliance and enforcement, all of which are necessary components of an effective plan.

B. Masking Requirement

Employers must also ensure that each employee who is not fully vaccinated wears a face covering when indoors and when occupying a vehicle with another person for work purposes, except:

  • When an employee is alone in a room with floor to ceiling walls and a closed door.
  • For a limited time while the employee is eating or drinking at the workplace or for identification purposes in compliance with safety and security requirements.
  • When an employee is wearing a respirator or facemask.
  • Where the employer can show that the use of face coverings is infeasible or creates a greater hazard that would excuse compliance (e.g., when it is important to see the employee’s mouth for reasons related to their job duties, when the work requires the use of the employee’s uncovered mouth, or when the use of a face covering presents a risk of serious injury or death to the employee).

Are there any exceptions to mandatory vaccination?

Yes, exceptions may be provided for those employees:

  • For whom a vaccine is medically contraindicated;
  • For whom medical necessity requires a delay in vaccination; or
  • Who are legally entitled to a reasonable accommodation under federal civil rights laws because they have a disability or sincerely held religious beliefs, practices, or observances that conflict with the vaccination requirement.

What is required for employees that are not fully vaccinated?

All covered employers must ensure that any unvaccinated employees begin producing a verified negative test to their employer on at least a weekly basis.

Do employers have to pay for the weekly testing alternative?

It depends.  While the ETS does not require employers to pay for any costs associated with testing, employer payment for testing may be required by other laws, regulations, or collective bargaining agreements or other collectively negotiated agreements. OSHA has also noted that the ETS also does not prohibit the employer from paying for costs associated with testing required by the ETS. Otherwise, the agency leaves the decision regarding who pays for the testing to the employer.

What happens if an employee tests positive for COVID-19?

Regardless of COVID-19 vaccination status or any COVID-19 testing required under the ETS, employers must immediately remove from the workplace any employee who receives a positive COVID-19 test or is diagnosed with COVID-19 by a licensed healthcare provider and keep the employee removed until the employee:

  • Receives a negative result on a COVID-19 nucleic acid amplification test (NAAT) following a positive result on a COVID-19 antigen test if the employee chooses to seek a NAAT test for confirmatory testing;
  • Meets the return to work criteria in CDC’s “Isolation Guidance”; or
  • Receives a recommendation to return to work from a licensed healthcare provider.

Are employers required to provide paid time off for vaccination and vaccination side effects?

Yes, all covered employers are required to provide paid time for their employees to get vaccinated and, if needed, sick leave to recover from side effects experienced that keep them from working.

What’s Next?

To date, legal challenges to the OSHA COVID-19 ETS have been filed in the 5th, 6th, 8th and 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals challenging the constitutionality of the ETS.  The ETS has even been stayed by the 5th Circuit which includes Texas, Louisiana, and Mississippi. 

Thus far, no such challenge has been filed by New Jersey or New York. Nonetheless, covered employers should prepare to implement a mandate or testing regimen, while staying apprised of legal updates.

If you have questions, please contact us

If you have any questions or if you would like to discuss the matter further, please contact me, Jorge R. de Armas or the Scarinci Hollenbeck attorney with whom you work, at 201-896-4100.

No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC, LLC

Related Posts

See all
Guardianships in New Jersey: When a Loved One Can No Longer Manage Personal or Financial Affairs post image

Guardianships in New Jersey: When a Loved One Can No Longer Manage Personal or Financial Affairs

When a family member can no longer make important decisions for themself, the question is often not whether the family will step in, but whether they have the legal authority to do so. A spouse may manage household finances, or an adult child may arrange medical care and pay bills. Still, informal assistance does not […]

Author: Marc J. Comer

Link to post with title - "Guardianships in New Jersey: When a Loved One Can No Longer Manage Personal or Financial Affairs"
New Jersey’s Revised UHAC Regulations: What Residential Developers Need to Know About Affordable Housing Commitments post image

New Jersey’s Revised UHAC Regulations: What Residential Developers Need to Know About Affordable Housing Commitments

New Jersey residential developers with affordable housing obligations should carefully review their existing approvals, development agreements, and proposed deed restrictions in light of the State’s revised UHAC regulations (Uniform Housing Affordability Controls). The regulations, which took effect on November 6, 2025, significantly change the administration and physical requirements for affordable housing units. For developers with […]

Author: Wendy Rubinstein Quiroga

Link to post with title - "New Jersey’s Revised UHAC Regulations: What Residential Developers Need to Know About Affordable Housing Commitments"
“No Comment” Culture: Why Silence Is Often the Riskiest Legal Strategy post image

“No Comment” Culture: Why Silence Is Often the Riskiest Legal Strategy

A “no comment” response is sometimes the right call when a legal problem arises. As a blanket policy, however, it lets allegations go unanswered, deadlines pass, evidence disappear, and manageable disputes grow into expensive litigation. The businesses that fare best are usually the ones that say little publicly while acting decisively behind the scenes. When […]

Author: Sean M. Pena

Link to post with title - "“No Comment” Culture: Why Silence Is Often the Riskiest Legal Strategy"
Utility-Scale Battery Storage Projects: A Legal Roadmap for Developers, Property Owners and Other Stakeholders post image

Utility-Scale Battery Storage Projects: A Legal Roadmap for Developers, Property Owners and Other Stakeholders

Utility-scale battery energy storage systems (BESS) are becoming an increasingly important component of the electric grid throughout New Jersey, New York, and Pennsylvania. As renewable generation expands, electricity demand increases and grid operators seek greater flexibility, battery storage can help balance supply and demand while providing additional capacity and reliability. For developers, battery storage presents […]

Author: Nicholas Wall

Link to post with title - "Utility-Scale Battery Storage Projects: A Legal Roadmap for Developers, Property Owners and Other Stakeholders"
Navigating Disputes: Hire a Partnership Dispute Lawyer post image

Navigating Disputes: Hire a Partnership Dispute Lawyer

A falling out between partners can be disastrous for any business. In many cases, the partnership will not survive. If you are in an unworkable situation with your partners, it may be time to consult a partnership dispute lawyer experienced in handling partnership breakups and dissolutions before the situation deteriorates any further. It is easy […]

Author: Jay McDaniel

Link to post with title - "Navigating Disputes: Hire a Partnership Dispute Lawyer"
Section 363 Sales in Bankruptcy: What Businesses, Lenders, and Buyers Need to Know post image

Section 363 Sales in Bankruptcy: What Businesses, Lenders, and Buyers Need to Know

When a company enters Chapter 11 bankruptcy, many assume the process will culminate in a lengthy reorganization plan. However, distressed businesses are increasingly being sold through a different mechanism — a sale under Section 363 of the United States Bankruptcy Code. A Section 363 sale allows a company, as a debtor-in-possession in bankruptcy, to sell […]

Author: John D. Giampolo

Link to post with title - "Section 363 Sales in Bankruptcy: What Businesses, Lenders, and Buyers Need to Know"

No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!

Explore What Matters Most to You.

Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.

Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.

Let`s get in touch!

* The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form. By providing a telephone number and submitting this form you are consenting to be contacted by SMS text message. Message & data rates may apply. Message frequency may vary. You can reply STOP to opt-out of further messaging.
“If you would like to submit a file, please email it directly to info@sh-law.com.

Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!