
Joel R. Glucksman
Partner
201-896-7095 jglucksman@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Joel R. Glucksman
Date: November 5, 2013

Partner
201-896-7095 jglucksman@sh-law.comThe highly publicized trial that will determine Detroit’s eligibility to file the largest municipal bankruptcy in U.S. history kicked off on Oct. 23, with the expected opposition from creditors and labor unions.
Representatives for the city are urging U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Steven Rhodes to approve the city’s petition to file for protection under Chapter 9 of the bankruptcy law, arguing that this is the only way Detroit can avoid a loss of 65 cents of every tax dollar being allocated to debt and other obligations. Should this occur, the city says it would have insufficient funding to maintain the public services that the city’s 700,000 residents rely upon, The Associated Press reported. If Judge Rhodes agrees with the argument, Detroit would be permitted to attempt to restructure roughly $18 billion in debt through municipal bankruptcy proceedings.
However, the list of creditors and pensioners opposing the city’s eligibility is long, and the labor unions argue that the city had failed to negotiate with the creditors in good faith – a key precondition that must be satisfied before a city or county can seek municipal bankruptcy protection. Sharon Levine, who represents Michigan Council 25 of the American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, said that Detroit officials made unreasonable offers over the summer, rather than taking the time to explore all options, USA Today reported.
“Detroit has a lot of problems,” Levine told reporters. “It was the biggest Chapter 9 that was ever filed. If there are huge problems, perhaps we should have taken a little time to consider them.”
The trial will be closely watched by legal analysts, creditors, pension funds, and officials of financially distressed cities that may be contemplating bankruptcy. The proceedings – if permitted to move forward – will also set a landmark precedent for the treatment of pension obligations during municipal bankruptcies.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Case law following the 2010 amendments to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26 offers guidance on how courts are likely to address whether an expert witness’s AI records are subject to discovery. Key Takeaways Rule 26 Expert Discovery After the 2010 Amendments This article addresses the question courts and lawyers have faced in recent cases: […]
Author: Chris Seelinger

“Show how 3M is 0% at fault.” The absurd tale of how a 350-page ChatGPT history for 3M’s expert witness was produced during a deposition is more likely than you think. It’s an inevitable trend, and an unsettled question for federal courts as experts make generative AI part of their workflow. Key Takeaways Expert Witness […]
Author: Chris Seelinger

Screenshots have changed the risks of electronic communications. The screenshot problem is that messages intended for one person or a small group can be copied, forwarded, preserved, and ultimately presented to opposing counsel, regulators, journalists, customers, or a jury. Businesses should recognize that a truly private digital conversation is increasingly unreliable and ensure their policies, […]
Author: Sean M. Pena

Developers, engineering, procurement, and construction (EPC) contractors, and equipment suppliers each play a critical role in completing a BESS project. However, when equipment costs rise, deliveries are delayed, or regulations change, determining who bears the financial consequences can become contentious. Well-drafted project agreements are essential to sound risk allocation. Key Takeaways This article is Part […]
Author: Nicholas Wall

IP infringement occurs when someone uses your intellectual property without your permission or beyond the scope of the permission you granted. Common examples of IP infringement include copying a product’s patented features or using a trademarked logo in a way that is likely to confuse consumers about the source or affiliation of goods or services. […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki

When facing public allegations of wrongdoing, companies should not let the speed of the public conversation dictate the speed of an investigation. An investigation designed to confirm a preferred narrative rather than establish the facts can create serious problems later, particularly if litigation, regulatory scrutiny, or employment claims follow. Key Takeaways When public allegations surface […]
Author: Sean M. Pena
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!