Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Date: October 28, 2014
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comAudi recently made headlines when its driverless car reached speeds of nearly 150 miles per hour. Google also unveiled its latest iteration of the self-driving car this past summer. Unlike prior designs, which retained steering wheels, brakes, and gas pedals, the tech giant’s latest model completely removes the driver from the equation.
While the timeline is not yet established, self-driving vehicles are likely the destined for a road near you. In addition to Audi and Google’s efforts, Daimler, Volvo, Toyota, Tesla and BMW are all working on autonomous vehicle technology.
The primary benefit of driverless vehicles — whether we are talking about cars, trains, or buses — is safety. There are 5.5 million traffic collisions in the United States every year, of which 81 percent are attributable to human error. According to Google, its self-driving vehicles have traveled 700,000 miles without an accident. Given the statistics, its experts predict that crashes could decrease by a much as 90 percent.
As beneficial as autonomous cars may be, they still face significant hurdles. First, regulators must get on board by allowing the vehicles on the road. Second, manufacturers must convince consumers that they are safe.
Some states have implemented regulations to address driverless cars, which are already on the road for testing. In California, operators of autonomous vehicles must undergo special training and be capable of taking over control in the case of an emergency. Manufacturers must report any type of accident or any situation where the autonomous technology disengages during operation to the state’s Department of Motor vehicles within 10 days. They must also maintain $5 million insurance or surety bond.
While these laws are a good first step, federal and state laws will likely need a significant overhaul before driverless cars are made widely available. From a road safety standpoint, key questions include: who is liable for accidents caused by self-driving cars, the human passenger or the carmaker; who is responsible for traffic violations, such as failing to yield or stop at a red light, if the vehicle was operating autonomously; how will impaired driving and distracted driving laws be enforced if occupants are not technically “driving?”
Cybersecurity is also a top legal concern, given that computers would largely usurp the roles of drivers. The Federal Bureau of Investigation is closely tracking the technology, citing concerns that hackers could take over automated vehicles and use them as “lethal weapons.”
Automakers are also addressing the risks. “The biggest stumbling block to any of these things is car security and also liability,” said Gavin Ward, a spokesman for BMW. “Those are the sort of issues that are still being worked out.”
Autonomous vehicle technology is predicted to become an $87 billion market by 2030, according to Lux Research. However, self-driving cars may not be good news for all businesses. If autonomous vehicles do become the norm, they could have a significant impact on the traditional business models employed in a number of industries, including car manufacturing, transportation, and auto insurance. Accordingly, we will be closely monitoring the technological and legal developments.
If you have any questions about how autonomous vehicle technology may impact your business or would like to discuss the legal issues involved, please contact me or the Scarinci Hollenbeck attorney with whom you work.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Compliance programs are no longer judged by how they look on paper, but by how they function in the real world. Compliance monitoring is the ongoing process of reviewing, testing, and evaluating whether policies, procedures, and controls are being followed—and whether they are actually working. What Is Compliance Monitoring? In today’s heightened regulatory environment, compliance […]
Author: Dan Brecher

New Jersey personal guaranty liability is a critical issue for business owners who regularly sign contracts on behalf of their companies. A recent New Jersey Supreme Court decision provides valuable guidance on when a business owner can be held personally responsible for a company’s debt. Under the Court’s decision in Extech Building Materials, Inc. v. […]
Author: Charles H. Friedrich

Commercial real estate trends in 2026 are being shaped by shifting economic conditions, technological innovation, and evolving tenant demands. As the market adjusts to changing interest rates, capital flows, and workplace models, investors, owners, tenants, and developers must understand how these trends are influencing opportunities and risk in the year ahead. Overall Outlook for Commercial […]
Author: Michael J. Willner

Part 2 – Tips Excluded from Income Certain employees and independent contractors may be eligible to deduct tips from their income for tax years 2025 through 2028 under provisions included in the One Big Beautiful Bill. The deduction is capped at $25,000 per year and begins to phase out at $150,000 of modified adjusted gross […]
Author: Scott H. Novak

Part 1 – Overtime Pay and Income Tax Treatment Overview This Firm Insights post summarizes one provision of the “One Big Beautiful Bill” related to the tax treatment of overtime compensation and related employer wage reporting obligations. Overtime Pay and Employee Tax Treatment The Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) generally requires that overtime be paid […]
Author: Scott H. Novak

In 2025, New York enacted one of the most consequential updates to its consumer protection framework in decades. The Fostering Affordability and Integrity through Reasonable Business Practices Act (FAIR Act) significantly expands the scope and strength of New York’s long-standing consumer protection statute, General Business Law § 349, and alters the compliance landscape for New York […]
Author: Dan Brecher
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!