
Joel R. Glucksman
Partner
201-896-7095 jglucksman@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Joel R. Glucksman
Date: June 21, 2013

Partner
201-896-7095 jglucksman@sh-law.comAfter weeks of speculation, battery manufacturer Exide Technologies has officially sought bankruptcy law protection under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code.
Despite its recent attempts to cut costs, the company has been unable to strengthen its finances in light of rising costs for materials and the state’s shutdown of one of its key facilities in Vernon, California. The 125-year-old business filed for protection in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court in Wilmington, Delaware, listing debts of $1.14 billion and assets of $1.89 billion.
Exide, which manufactures lead-acid batteries used in cars, trucks, tractors, and boats in more than 80 countries, said the filing will only affect its U.S. operations. Its U.S. business was impacted heavily by the temporary closing of its Vernon facility, which was shut down on April 24 by the California Department of Toxic Substances and Control for state health violations. In its filing, Exide said the shutdown would cut $24 million from its earnings before taxes, interest, and depreciation, Bloomberg reports.
In addition, the company lost its contract with Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., in 2010, which reduced its sales by $160 million annually. Further, the company was nearing a deadline to pay $31 million in debt interest in August and $51.9 million worth of bonds maturing in September.
“Our restructuring will allow us to strengthen our balance sheet and complete the operational changes that build upon the strategies that we have been pursuing,” said James Bolch, Exide’s chief executive, according to the New York Times. “Over and above these efforts, we intend to become even more aggressive in reducing costs, taking actions with respect to underperforming business segments and to focus on the most attractive areas for future growth.”
Exide said it will continue to operate normally during Chapter 11 proceedings, and has secured $500 million in debtor-in-possession financing from JPMorgan Chase to maintain its operations.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Case law following the 2010 amendments to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26 offers guidance on how courts are likely to address whether an expert witness’s AI records are subject to discovery. Key Takeaways Rule 26 Expert Discovery After the 2010 Amendments This article addresses the question courts and lawyers have faced in recent cases: […]
Author: Chris Seelinger

“Show how 3M is 0% at fault.” The absurd tale of how a 350-page ChatGPT history for 3M’s expert witness was produced during a deposition is more likely than you think. It’s an inevitable trend, and an unsettled question for federal courts as experts make generative AI part of their workflow. Key Takeaways Expert Witness […]
Author: Chris Seelinger

Screenshots have changed the risks of electronic communications. The screenshot problem is that messages intended for one person or a small group can be copied, forwarded, preserved, and ultimately presented to opposing counsel, regulators, journalists, customers, or a jury. Businesses should recognize that a truly private digital conversation is increasingly unreliable and ensure their policies, […]
Author: Sean M. Pena

Developers, engineering, procurement, and construction (EPC) contractors, and equipment suppliers each play a critical role in completing a BESS project. However, when equipment costs rise, deliveries are delayed, or regulations change, determining who bears the financial consequences can become contentious. Well-drafted project agreements are essential to sound risk allocation. Key Takeaways This article is Part […]
Author: Nicholas Wall

IP infringement occurs when someone uses your intellectual property without your permission or beyond the scope of the permission you granted. Common examples of IP infringement include copying a product’s patented features or using a trademarked logo in a way that is likely to confuse consumers about the source or affiliation of goods or services. […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki

When facing public allegations of wrongdoing, companies should not let the speed of the public conversation dictate the speed of an investigation. An investigation designed to confirm a preferred narrative rather than establish the facts can create serious problems later, particularly if litigation, regulatory scrutiny, or employment claims follow. Key Takeaways When public allegations surface […]
Author: Sean M. Pena
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!