
James F. McDonough
Of Counsel
732-568-8360 jmcdonough@sh-law.com
Of Counsel
732-568-8360 jmcdonough@sh-law.comFacebook’s Initial Public Offering (IPO) received a great deal of attention, especially after the price of its stock dropped shortly after its first day of trading. The decline in price dominated the news for weeks. While driving to the office this week, I listened to Bloomberg report that Facebook’s stock price hit $50 a share on September 26, 2013. The Bloomberg report validated the planning strategies undertaken by the Facebook insiders and demonstrates that the timing of a transfer may yield incalculable benefits.
On June 4, 2012, I wrote about a Facebook insider who expatriated from the U.S. to Singapore. Mr. Eduardo Saverin relinquished his U.S. citizenship in September 2011, months before the public offering on May 18, 2012. The act of expatriation causes the departing United States citizen to recognize gain on a deemed sale of all of his assets. Assuming a market value of $25 per share at the time of expatriation, the timing of Mr. Saverin’s departure appears to have saved him hundreds of millions of dollars in income and estate taxes. Given that the IPO price was not set and the sluggish economy, the figure actually used may have been lower than my estimate. After all, we were coming out of a recession and there were no other comparable transactions in the market. Any estimate of value in 2011 was tempered by doom and gloom of a moribund economy and an uninspired or non-existent IPO market. The timing of Mr. Saverin’s departure worked to his advantage.
On June 11, 2012, I wrote about Grantor Retained Annuity Trusts (GRAT) and the various strategies one might put in place to hedge a decline in price. The news was filled with stories of Facebook insiders who remained U.S. citizens and utilized GRATs or rolling GRATs (as described in my blog on July 25, 2012). When we look back to May 2012, these insiders saved themselves an incredible amount of money. In our gift tax system, we must value the gift upon the date of transfer. The stock price has nearly doubled in value and approximately one-half of an insider’s wealth may have been moved outside of the transfer tax system. Assume the transfer to the GRAT is valued at $26 per share and the value rises to $50, this means that $24 per share passes to the remainder without being subject to gift tax.
Corporate insiders and knowledgeable investors anticipate when stock and asset values will rise. In today’s slow or low growth economy, each day brings us closer to more normal economic activity and increasing asset values. Thus, it appears that we should be able to anticipate escalating asset prices in the coming years. Now would be an ideal time to transfer appreciating assets to a GRAT in order to lock in the lower values for purposes of the computations required by the transfer tax system.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Case law following the 2010 amendments to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26 offers guidance on how courts are likely to address whether an expert witness’s AI records are subject to discovery. Key Takeaways Rule 26 Expert Discovery After the 2010 Amendments This article addresses the question courts and lawyers have faced in recent cases: […]
Author: Chris Seelinger

“Show how 3M is 0% at fault.” The absurd tale of how a 350-page ChatGPT history for 3M’s expert witness was produced during a deposition is more likely than you think. It’s an inevitable trend, and an unsettled question for federal courts as experts make generative AI part of their workflow. Key Takeaways Expert Witness […]
Author: Chris Seelinger

Screenshots have changed the risks of electronic communications. The screenshot problem is that messages intended for one person or a small group can be copied, forwarded, preserved, and ultimately presented to opposing counsel, regulators, journalists, customers, or a jury. Businesses should recognize that a truly private digital conversation is increasingly unreliable and ensure their policies, […]
Author: Sean M. Pena

Developers, engineering, procurement, and construction (EPC) contractors, and equipment suppliers each play a critical role in completing a BESS project. However, when equipment costs rise, deliveries are delayed, or regulations change, determining who bears the financial consequences can become contentious. Well-drafted project agreements are essential to sound risk allocation. Key Takeaways This article is Part […]
Author: Nicholas Wall

IP infringement occurs when someone uses your intellectual property without your permission or beyond the scope of the permission you granted. Common examples of IP infringement include copying a product’s patented features or using a trademarked logo in a way that is likely to confuse consumers about the source or affiliation of goods or services. […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki

When facing public allegations of wrongdoing, companies should not let the speed of the public conversation dictate the speed of an investigation. An investigation designed to confirm a preferred narrative rather than establish the facts can create serious problems later, particularly if litigation, regulatory scrutiny, or employment claims follow. Key Takeaways When public allegations surface […]
Author: Sean M. Pena
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!