James F. McDonough
Of Counsel
732-568-8360 jmcdonough@sh-law.comFirm Insights
The Fatherless Child: The Law Struggles to Catch Up to Reproductive Technology
Author: James F. McDonough
Date: August 6, 2013
Key Contacts
Back
The Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit filed a decision in Capato v. Commissioner Social Security, on July 24, 2013, that highlights the need for a legislative solution in providing benefits under federal programs. The Court held that twins, conceived after the death of their biological father through assisted reproductive technology, were not entitled to Social Security benefits.
The Court reversed a previous ruling in this matter. Social Security legislation enacted in 1939 provided for survivor’s benefits for children of wage earners. The hot-button issue at that time was children born out of wedlock. In the 1960s, children of unwed parents were extended social security benefits survivor’s benefits. The test used to determine if the children were eligible for benefits was whether the children would qualify as heirs of the deceased parent under the laws of the state where the decedent was domiciled at the time of his or her death.
Fast forward to 2013, and a test created in the 1960s operates in an unanticipated manner. In the instant case, the Court ruled that the decedent-father was domiciled in Florida, where state law provides that a child conceived from eggs or sperm of a person or persons who died before the transfer of eggs, sperm or pre-embryos to a woman’s body shall not be eligible for a claim against the decedent’s estate unless the child has been provided for by the decedent’s will. Fla. Stat. Ann §742.17(4). The result might have been different if the decedent-father died in another state. If the twins were born within 300 days of the decedent’s death, New Jersey law would presume the decedent-husband was the father.
N.J.S.A. §9:17-43. There is an issue of fairness where two families, with virtually identical facts, could receive a different outcome for purposes of a federal benefits program because of the differences of law in their respective states of residence. Consider the possibility that the class of heirs may never close if eggs and sperm remain available indefinitely to assisted reproductive technology. Imagine the impact upon the Rule Against Perpetuities, the Generation Skipping Transfer Tax, or estate probate and inheritance.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Related Posts
See all
Does Your Homeowners Insurance Provide Adequate Coverage?
Your home is likely your greatest asset, which is why it is so important to adequately protect it. Homeowners insurance protects you from the financial costs of unforeseen losses, such as theft, fire, and natural disasters, by helping you rebuild and replace possessions that were lost While the definition of “adequate” coverage depends upon a […]
Author: Jesse M. Dimitro
Understanding the Importance of a Non-Contingent Offer
Making a non-contingent offer can dramatically increase your chances of securing a real estate transaction, particularly in competitive markets like New York City. However, buyers should understand that waiving contingencies, including those related to financing, or appraisals, also comes with significant risks. Determining your best strategy requires careful analysis of the property, the market, and […]
Author: Jesse M. Dimitro
Fred D. Zemel Appointed Chair of Strategic Planning at Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC
Business Transactional Attorney Zemel to Spearhead Strategic Initiatives for Continued Growth and Innovation Little Falls, NJ – February 21, 2025 – Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC is pleased to announce that Partner Fred D. Zemel has been named Chair of the firm’s Strategic Planning Committee. In this role, Mr. Zemel will lead the committee in identifying, […]
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Novation Agreement Process: Step-by-Step Guide for Businesses
Big changes sometimes occur during the life cycle of a contract. Cancelling a contract outright can be bad for your reputation and your bottom line. Businesses need to know how to best address a change in circumstances, while also protecting their legal rights. One option is to transfer the “benefits and the burdens” of a […]
Author: Dan Brecher
What Is a Trade Secret? Key Elements and Legal Protections Explained
What is a trade secret and why you you protect them? Technology has made trade secret theft even easier and more prevalent. In fact, businesses lose billions of dollars every year due to trade secret theft committed by employees, competitors, and even foreign governments. But what is a trade secret? And how do you protect […]
Author: Ronald S. Bienstock
What Is Title Insurance? Safeguarding Against Title Defects
If you are considering the purchase of a property, you may wonder — what is title insurance, do I need it, and why do I need it? Even seasoned property owners may question if the added expense and extra paperwork is really necessary, especially considering that people and entities insured by title insurance make fewer […]
Author: Patrick T. Conlon
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
The Fatherless Child: The Law Struggles to Catch Up to Reproductive Technology
Author: James F. McDonough
The Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit filed a decision in Capato v. Commissioner Social Security, on July 24, 2013, that highlights the need for a legislative solution in providing benefits under federal programs. The Court held that twins, conceived after the death of their biological father through assisted reproductive technology, were not entitled to Social Security benefits.
The Court reversed a previous ruling in this matter. Social Security legislation enacted in 1939 provided for survivor’s benefits for children of wage earners. The hot-button issue at that time was children born out of wedlock. In the 1960s, children of unwed parents were extended social security benefits survivor’s benefits. The test used to determine if the children were eligible for benefits was whether the children would qualify as heirs of the deceased parent under the laws of the state where the decedent was domiciled at the time of his or her death.
Fast forward to 2013, and a test created in the 1960s operates in an unanticipated manner. In the instant case, the Court ruled that the decedent-father was domiciled in Florida, where state law provides that a child conceived from eggs or sperm of a person or persons who died before the transfer of eggs, sperm or pre-embryos to a woman’s body shall not be eligible for a claim against the decedent’s estate unless the child has been provided for by the decedent’s will. Fla. Stat. Ann §742.17(4). The result might have been different if the decedent-father died in another state. If the twins were born within 300 days of the decedent’s death, New Jersey law would presume the decedent-husband was the father.
N.J.S.A. §9:17-43. There is an issue of fairness where two families, with virtually identical facts, could receive a different outcome for purposes of a federal benefits program because of the differences of law in their respective states of residence. Consider the possibility that the class of heirs may never close if eggs and sperm remain available indefinitely to assisted reproductive technology. Imagine the impact upon the Rule Against Perpetuities, the Generation Skipping Transfer Tax, or estate probate and inheritance.