Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Date: September 19, 2019
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comTrademark owners and applicants are the target of ongoing scams, including emails that misleadingly suggest certain fees must be paid through the soliciting company. To increase awareness, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) recently issued another warning regarding fraudulent trademark solicitations that appear to be official correspondence.

Trademark applicants and owners routinely receive correspondence from the USPTO for legitimate purposes concerning legitimate deadlines and fees. However, they also receive emails from private companies that attempt to profit from the applicants/owners. To avoid being scammed, it is important to know the difference.
As the USPTO notes in its latest warning, private companies often use trademark application and registration information from USPTO databases to mail or email solicitations to trademark applicants and registrants. While the information contained in these solicitations may be accurate (for example, that a certain filing is due to keep a registration active), using these private services is never a requirement of trademark registration.
While some services may be legitimate (i.e. assistance in responding to an office action issued against an application), many others are not, including offering to record trademarks in a “private” registry separate from the USPTO. Some solicitations also purport to be official USPTO correspondence when they are not. As the USPTO warns:
All official correspondence about your trademark application or registration will be from the “United States Patent and Trademark Office” in Alexandria, Virginia, and all emails will be from the domain “@uspto.gov.” Don’t be fooled by company names that sound like government agencies or offers that contain government data. Some company names may include terms like “United States,” “U.S.,” “Trademark,” “Patent,” “Registration,” “Office,” or “Agency.” Some offers and notices may include official government data publicly available from USPTO records, or refer to other government agencies and sections of the U.S. Code.
The USPTO frequently posts warnings on its website with specific details of the scams. At last count, the agency listed nearly 50 different fraudulent trademark solicitations. The agency also recently posted a video to help trademark registrants learn about potentially misleading trademark offers and notices, the types of services they offer, and how to detect them.
The scams continue to proliferate because the USPTO can do little to stop them. As the USPTO emphasizes, it is not an enforcement agency. “We don’t have the legal authority to stop private companies from sending trademark-related offers and notices, nor can we sue or prosecute entities that defraud or attempt to defraud our applicants and registrants,” the agency states on its website. “However, we can raise awareness and work closely with the Department of Justice, the Federal Trade Commission, and the United States Postal Inspection Service to combat the problem.”
The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) can take action, but typically only does so after receiving numerous complaints about the same company. For this reason, if you receive a fraudulent trademark solicitation, it is important to notify the FTC by filing a consumer complaint.
To avoid falling victim to a fraudulent trademark scam, businesses should always read the “fine print” carefully. If you have concerns about a pending trademark registration, application, or upcoming renewal deadline, you can consult an experienced intellectual property attorney. It is also advisable to verify the legitimacy of any trademark solicitation before enrolling in these services or sending any money.
If you have any questions or if you would like to discuss the matter further, please contact me, Kristin Garris, or the Scarinci Hollenbeck attorney with whom you work, at 201-806-3364.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

IP infringement occurs when someone uses your intellectual property without your permission or beyond the scope of the permission you granted. Common examples of IP infringement include copying a product’s patented features or using a trademarked logo in a way that is likely to confuse consumers about the source or affiliation of goods or services. […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki

When facing public allegations of wrongdoing, companies should not let the speed of the public conversation dictate the speed of an investigation. An investigation designed to confirm a preferred narrative rather than establish the facts can create serious problems later, particularly if litigation, regulatory scrutiny, or employment claims follow. Key Takeaways When public allegations surface […]
Author: Sean M. Pena

For battery energy storage system (BESS) developers, securing equipment and site control is only part of the development equation. A project must also connect to the electric grid, and increasingly, BESS interconnection is one of the biggest sources of schedule, cost, and contractual risk. Key Takeaways This article is Part 3 of our Battery Storage […]
Author: Nicholas Wall

Director and officer liability increases sharply when a company is in financial distress. Decisions that would draw little attention in a healthy business can later be challenged by creditors, shareholders, bankruptcy trustees, and regulators as breaches of fiduciary duty, fraudulent transfers, or oversight failures. Understanding where that exposure comes from, and how to manage it, […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki

For developers pursuing battery energy storage system (BESS) projects, finding the right property is only the beginning. BESS site selection is as much a legal and transactional exercise as a real estate decision, with risk analysis central to the project’s ultimate success. Key Takeaways The core questions for BESS site selection in New York and […]
Author: Nicholas Wall

What should you expect when meeting a litigation attorney about a business dispute? You should expect to describe the dispute in your own words, hand over the most important documents, flag any deadlines or immediate threats, and leave with a clearer picture of the problem, what information is still needed, and the likely next steps. […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!