
Joel R. Glucksman
Partner
201-896-7095 jglucksman@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Joel R. Glucksman
Date: May 16, 2014

Partner
201-896-7095 jglucksman@sh-law.comGSE Environmental Inc. and its affiliates filed for protection under Chapter 11 of the bankruptcy law May 4, according to Reuters. GSE makes spill containment products, including geosynthetic lining, for the waste management, water and mining sectors. In a court filing, the company listed assets of between $100 million and $500 million, and liabilities within the same range.
GSE has received approximately $45 million in debtor-in-possession financing, the news source reported. It plans to use this funding to repay debt and for general corporate purposes. The Houston-based company was delisted from the New York Stock Exchange two months ago after it failed to maintain listing requirements. The most recent results published for GSE came from its third quarter posting in 2013, which reported a $35.8 million loss, or $1.77 per share. One year earlier, the company reported a $5.2 million profit, or 26 cents per share.
In total, GSE Environmental’s profits declined from $46 million in 2012 to $16 million in 2013, according to The Wall Street Journal. The company cited heightened competition and the lingering effects of the European recession for its financial position. The filing only effects GSE’s North American operations, which it plans to hand off to European lenders. GSE Environmental’s other international affiliates and debt won’t be affected, nor will a $40 million manufacturing facility built last year in Suzhou, China.
Under the restructuring that GSE is proposing, trade suppliers would share $1 million, the Journal explained. Ownership of the company would pass to senior lenders Littlejohn Opportunities Master Fund LP, Tennenbaum Opportunities Partners V, LP and Strategic Value Partners, LLC. GSE is based in Houston, Texas, but also maintains plants in Chile, Germany, Thailand, China and Egypt. A controlling share in the company is owned by CHS Capital LLC and its affiliates, the rest by former directors, officers and investors.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Case law following the 2010 amendments to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26 offers guidance on how courts are likely to address whether an expert witness’s AI records are subject to discovery. Key Takeaways Rule 26 Expert Discovery After the 2010 Amendments This article addresses the question courts and lawyers have faced in recent cases: […]
Author: Chris Seelinger

“Show how 3M is 0% at fault.” The absurd tale of how a 350-page ChatGPT history for 3M’s expert witness was produced during a deposition is more likely than you think. It’s an inevitable trend, and an unsettled question for federal courts as experts make generative AI part of their workflow. Key Takeaways Expert Witness […]
Author: Chris Seelinger

Screenshots have changed the risks of electronic communications. The screenshot problem is that messages intended for one person or a small group can be copied, forwarded, preserved, and ultimately presented to opposing counsel, regulators, journalists, customers, or a jury. Businesses should recognize that a truly private digital conversation is increasingly unreliable and ensure their policies, […]
Author: Sean M. Pena

Developers, engineering, procurement, and construction (EPC) contractors, and equipment suppliers each play a critical role in completing a BESS project. However, when equipment costs rise, deliveries are delayed, or regulations change, determining who bears the financial consequences can become contentious. Well-drafted project agreements are essential to sound risk allocation. Key Takeaways This article is Part […]
Author: Nicholas Wall

IP infringement occurs when someone uses your intellectual property without your permission or beyond the scope of the permission you granted. Common examples of IP infringement include copying a product’s patented features or using a trademarked logo in a way that is likely to confuse consumers about the source or affiliation of goods or services. […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki

When facing public allegations of wrongdoing, companies should not let the speed of the public conversation dictate the speed of an investigation. An investigation designed to confirm a preferred narrative rather than establish the facts can create serious problems later, particularly if litigation, regulatory scrutiny, or employment claims follow. Key Takeaways When public allegations surface […]
Author: Sean M. Pena
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!