
Joel R. Glucksman
Partner
201-896-7095 jglucksman@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Joel R. Glucksman
Date: February 5, 2013

Partner
201-896-7095 jglucksman@sh-law.comHandy Hardware Wholesale, Inc., a dealer-owned hardware wholesale group operating in 14 states filed for Chapter 11 protection under bankruptcy law after a costly expansion straddled it with debt.
Handy filed for protection from its creditors in U.S. Bankruptcy Court in Wilmington, Delaware. The wholesale group has roughly 1,000 members, who wholly own the company, and 1,300 facilities that include retail hardware stores, home centers, and lumber yards. The group formed in an effort to make it more competitive against big box chains, such as Lowe’s and Home Depot. However, the company ran into financial trouble following its expansion into the southeastern U.S., according to Dow Jones Newswires.
Handy Hardware constructed a 460,000 square-foot distribution center and warehouse in Mississippi during the midst of the recession in 2009. As a result of higher costs taken on by the company to build the center, coupled with falling revenue that resulted from the down economy, Handy Hardware was unable to stay afloat and meet its operating costs. In 2011 alone, the company reported a loss of $8.4 million.
The company listed assets of $50 million and debt totaling $100 million in its court filing. In addition to bond debt, the company owes roughly $14.6 million to its largest secured creditor, Wells Fargo, the news source reports. Following the bankruptcy filing, Wells Fargo agreed to extend a $30 million dollar loan to the distressed company, which refinances the $14.6 million owed and offers $15.4 million in new financing, Dow Jones reports.
Although the company has not announced the specifics of its reorganization plan, members said they hope to emerge from proceedings in a stronger position, and still plan to operate as a member-owned company.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Case law following the 2010 amendments to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26 offers guidance on how courts are likely to address whether an expert witness’s AI records are subject to discovery. Key Takeaways Rule 26 Expert Discovery After the 2010 Amendments This article addresses the question courts and lawyers have faced in recent cases: […]
Author: Chris Seelinger

“Show how 3M is 0% at fault.” The absurd tale of how a 350-page ChatGPT history for 3M’s expert witness was produced during a deposition is more likely than you think. It’s an inevitable trend, and an unsettled question for federal courts as experts make generative AI part of their workflow. Key Takeaways Expert Witness […]
Author: Chris Seelinger

Screenshots have changed the risks of electronic communications. The screenshot problem is that messages intended for one person or a small group can be copied, forwarded, preserved, and ultimately presented to opposing counsel, regulators, journalists, customers, or a jury. Businesses should recognize that a truly private digital conversation is increasingly unreliable and ensure their policies, […]
Author: Sean M. Pena

Developers, engineering, procurement, and construction (EPC) contractors, and equipment suppliers each play a critical role in completing a BESS project. However, when equipment costs rise, deliveries are delayed, or regulations change, determining who bears the financial consequences can become contentious. Well-drafted project agreements are essential to sound risk allocation. Key Takeaways This article is Part […]
Author: Nicholas Wall

IP infringement occurs when someone uses your intellectual property without your permission or beyond the scope of the permission you granted. Common examples of IP infringement include copying a product’s patented features or using a trademarked logo in a way that is likely to confuse consumers about the source or affiliation of goods or services. […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki

When facing public allegations of wrongdoing, companies should not let the speed of the public conversation dictate the speed of an investigation. An investigation designed to confirm a preferred narrative rather than establish the facts can create serious problems later, particularly if litigation, regulatory scrutiny, or employment claims follow. Key Takeaways When public allegations surface […]
Author: Sean M. Pena
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!