Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Date: March 30, 2017
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comIf you have kids (or a very good memory back to your own childhood), you may recall that Play-Doh has a very distinctive smell. It is such an integral part of the product that Hasbro, Inc. recently filed for federal trademark protection for that scent.

Hasbro sells 500 million cans of Play-Doh each year and recently made headlines when it announced plans to again manufacture the clay in the United States. According to the company, it has used the same scent in its Play-Doh since 1995. If you are having difficulty placing the scent, the trademark registration application describes it as “a unique scent formed through the combination of a sweet, slightly musky, vanilla-like fragrance, with slight overtones of cherry, and the natural smell of a salted, wheat-based dough.”
Hasbro maintains that it already has “legally enforceable common law trademark rights” for this scent. However, the company filed a federal trademark application for this scent on February 14 of this year to bolster its legal rights. Federal trademark registration has several important benefits, including:
Trademark registrations for scents are very rare. In addition to a lower demand for such non-conventional trademarks, they are also more difficult to obtain. As the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office acknowledges in the U.S. Trademark Manual of Examining Procedure (TMEP), “The amount of evidence required to establish that a scent or fragrance functions as a mark is substantial.” To obtain federal trademark registration for a scent, the applicant must demonstrate that (1) the scent serves a nonfunctional purpose; and (2) the scent has acquired distinctiveness.
Despite the high threshold, there have been at least a dozen scent marks on the federal trademark register since 1990. Examples include a mark described as “high impact, fresh, floral fragrance reminiscent of Plumeria blossoms” used for sewing thread and embroidery yarn. Another one is a mark for a “bubble gum” scent for shoes and flip flops.
Assuming Hasbro’s trademark is approved, how exactly will the company enforce it? Since Internet search tools and monitoring services are unavailable for scent trademarks, the company will likely have to rely upon its own investigations and upon the public to notify the company about potential trademark infringements.
While this policing method may be less scientific, the deterrent value alone may make registration worthwhile. According to Hasbro, it is not aware of any potential infringement to date. However, Hasbro is hoping that it can obtain a federal registration to serve as notice to its competitors that they may not use the same distinctive scent in their modeling clays.
Do you have any questions? Would you like to discuss the matter further? If so, please contact me, David Einhorn, at 201-806-3364.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

IP infringement occurs when someone uses your intellectual property without your permission or beyond the scope of the permission you granted. Common examples of IP infringement include copying a product’s patented features or using a trademarked logo in a way that is likely to confuse consumers about the source or affiliation of goods or services. […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki

When facing public allegations of wrongdoing, companies should not let the speed of the public conversation dictate the speed of an investigation. An investigation designed to confirm a preferred narrative rather than establish the facts can create serious problems later, particularly if litigation, regulatory scrutiny, or employment claims follow. Key Takeaways When public allegations surface […]
Author: Sean M. Pena

For battery energy storage system (BESS) developers, securing equipment and site control is only part of the development equation. A project must also connect to the electric grid, and increasingly, BESS interconnection is one of the biggest sources of schedule, cost, and contractual risk. Key Takeaways This article is Part 3 of our Battery Storage […]
Author: Nicholas Wall

Director and officer liability increases sharply when a company is in financial distress. Decisions that would draw little attention in a healthy business can later be challenged by creditors, shareholders, bankruptcy trustees, and regulators as breaches of fiduciary duty, fraudulent transfers, or oversight failures. Understanding where that exposure comes from, and how to manage it, […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki

For developers pursuing battery energy storage system (BESS) projects, finding the right property is only the beginning. BESS site selection is as much a legal and transactional exercise as a real estate decision, with risk analysis central to the project’s ultimate success. Key Takeaways The core questions for BESS site selection in New York and […]
Author: Nicholas Wall

What should you expect when meeting a litigation attorney about a business dispute? You should expect to describe the dispute in your own words, hand over the most important documents, flag any deadlines or immediate threats, and leave with a clearer picture of the problem, what information is still needed, and the likely next steps. […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!