Whether you are currently involved in the NFT market or possibly considering NFTs as a potential investment opportunity, understanding the intellectual property implications of NFTs is important…
Non-fungible tokens, or NFTs, will remain a hot topic in 2023. Whether you are currently involved in the NFT market or possibly considering NFTs as a potential investment opportunity, understanding the intellectual property implications of NFTs is important. At the same time, it is important to understand that NFTs represent a new and rapidly evolving area of law with significant “grey areas” still remaining.
The Basics of NFTs
An NFT is defined as ‘‘a unique digital identifier that cannot be copied, substituted, or subdivided, that is recorded in a blockchain, and that is used to certify authenticity and ownership (as of a specific digital asset and specific rights relating to it).” Similar to cryptocurrencies such as Bitcoin and Ether, NFTs are created (known as “minted”) and then stored in blockchains. Once created, NFTs are listed on an NFT marketplace where they can be sold or traded in accordance with “smart contracts” that govern the transfers. NFTs are non-distributable and cannot be shared by multiple owners.
Due to their unique characteristics, NFTs have a wide range of uses and enable owners to access specific digital content associated with the NFT. In recent years, NFTs have become popular among collectors of art and memorabilia. There are now numerous online marketplaces selling NFTs, with Open Sea, Foundation, and Nifty Gateway among the most popular. In light of the popularity of NFTs, major auction houses and galleries have also started selling NFT in the form of art. In June 2021, for example, Sotheby’s sold Larva Labs’ rare CryptoPunk #7523 for $11.8 million.
While the NFT market cooled significantly in 2022, NFT sales still totaled $3.4 billion in the third quarter. The NFT market is expected to reach a value of nearly $232 billion by 2030, according to consulting firm Verified Market Research.
IP Rights and NFTs
As NFTs have surged in popularity, the law has struggled to keep pace with the rapidly evolving landscape. To date, there are few laws and regulations that directly govern the creation, transfer, or use of NFTs.
As for intellectual property (IP) rights, the underlying content of NFTs, such as art, music, and videos, is generally protected by existing IP rights. For instance, absent a license, the copyright holder of a musical composition or artwork is generally the only one authorized to transform the original work into an NFT.
Without the express transfer of rights, an NFT is essentially a “certificate of authenticity” for the digital asset and does not automatically transfer any IP rights to the underlying digital asset to the NFT purchaser. However, during the minting process, IP owners can specify via a smart contract what IP rights (if any) are granted to the purchaser. For example, most NFTs grant the purchaser a license to use, copy, and display the NFT. Other NFT smart contracts include royalty provisions that allow creators to collect compensation each time their NFT is sold.
In most cases, an NFT project (or NFT series) is also entitled to trademark protection. Over the past few years, many brand owners have also taken steps to protect the digital use of their trademarks. For instance, apparel and footwear companies ranging from Louis Vuitton to Nike have filed trademarks for making and selling virtual goods.
IP Lawsuits Involving NFTs
Not surprisingly, NFTs have spurred IP litigation and related disputes. One of the most contested issues is who has the right to create NFTs from content that already has associated IP rights. In 2021, Miramax LLC filed a copyright and trademark infringement lawsuit against director Quentin Tarantino for selling uncut scenes from his film “Pulp Fiction” in the form of NFTs in violation of the parties’ licensing agreement. The two sides later reached an out-of-court settlement, highlighting the legal risks of litigating in untested waters.
More recently, luxury handbag maker Hermès filed a trademark infringement lawsuit alleging that artist Mason Rothschild’s MetaBurkin NFTs infringe on its lucrative trademark, charactering the NFTs as “digital knockoffs.” In defense of the suit, Rothschild maintains that his MetaBirkinsare artworks protected by the First Amendment.
Based on the arguments raised by both sides, the deciding factor in the dispute may hinge on whether the NFTs are considered art or simply a digital commodity. Regardless of whether the court finds the NFTs qualify as an artistic expression, Hermès could still prevail if the court finds that Rothschild’s use of its trademark was explicitly misleading to consumers.
USPTO and Copyright Office Studying NFTs
The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) and the United States Copyright Office (Copyright Office) recently launched a joint study regarding issues of IP law and policy associated with NFTs. The Senate’s intellectual property subcommittee initially called on the USPTO and Copyright Office to conduct the study, citing the need for clarity regarding the unique interplay between NFTs and intellectual property rights. “NFTs can be found in nearly all spheres — from academia to entertainment to medicine, art and beyond,” the Senate’s letter stated. “Thus, it is imperative that we understand how NFTs fit into the world of intellectual property rights — as said rights stand today and as they may evolve as we move into the future.”
In their Notice of Inquiry, the Copyright Office and USPTO solicited public comment on several important questions, including to what extent NFTs present challenges for IP rights holders and whether current IP laws are adequate to address the protection and enforcement of IP in the context of NFTs. Comments may be submitted on Regulations.gov through February 3, 2023.
The agencies also plan to conduct a series of roundtable discussions during the month of January. The three public roundtables will occur as follows and will be made available to the public:
Trademarks: Tuesday, January 24, 2023
Patents: Thursday, January 26, 2023
Copyright: Tuesday, January 31, 2023
How We Can Help
Scarinci Hollenbeck is committed to assisting clients navigate cutting-edge legal issues, including IP-related challenges or opportunities associated with NFTs. For information about how to revise your IP strategies to reflect the emergence of this new technology, we encourage you to contact our experienced IP team. Otherwise, if you have any questions or if you would like to discuss the matter further, please contact me, Albert J. Soler, or the Scarinci Hollenbeck attorney with whom you work, at 201-896-4100.
What Business Owners Get Wrong Before Meeting a Litigation Attorney
What should you expect when meeting a litigation attorney about a business dispute? You should expect to describe the dispute in your own words, hand over the most important documents, flag any deadlines or immediate threats, and leave with a clearer picture of the problem, what information is still needed, and the likely next steps. […]
Arbitration vs. Litigation vs. Mediation: What New Jersey Businesses Should Know Before Signing a Contract
Arbitration resolves disputes privately before an arbitrator whose decision is usually final, while litigation resolves them in court with full rights of appeal. Whether a business ends up in arbitration or litigation is often decided when it signs the contract, long before any dispute arises. Key Takeaways When facing a contract dispute, carefully consider your […]
Can You Own Part of a New Jersey Business Without a Written Agreement?
Can you own part of a business in New Jersey without a written agreement? Yes, it is possible. Under New Jersey’s Uniform Partnership Act, a partnership can arise when two or more people carry on a business as co-owners for profit, whether or not they ever intended to form one. Ownership doesn’t necessarily depend on […]
Crisis-Proofing Your New Jersey Business: Building a Crisis Response Plan Before You Need One
For New Jersey businesses, crisis preparedness should be viewed as a legal and operational function, not simply an emergency-management exercise. A well-designed crisis response plan can help preserve evidence, protect confidential communications, meet reporting obligations, limit unnecessary exposure, and prevent an already difficult situation from becoming a larger legal problem. Key Takeaways A serious crisis […]
Monmouth County's Next Development Wave: What Developers and Investors Need to Know
Monmouth County is entering a significant new phase of development. For those looking to acquire property or undertake a new project, understanding the market opportunity is only the beginning. The more important question is whether a particular property can actually be developed as contemplated and what approvals, agreements, and other conditions will be required to […]
Are Your Conversations with AI Shielded from Discovery? Courts Are Split
Whether a client’s prompts to a generative AI tool and the documents it produces are protected from disclosure depends on the case type, who claims protection, and whether counsel was involved. In United States v. Heppner, a New York federal judge ruled that a criminal defendant’s communications with an AI platform were protected by neither […]
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!
