James F. McDonough
Of Counsel
732-568-8360 jmcdonough@sh-law.comKey Contacts
Back
It is easy to discern a trend, especially in international taxation. One of the largest Swiss banks plead guilty to criminal charges for helping U.S. taxpayers avoid income taxes.
Countries continue to enter into FACTA agreements with the U.S. rather than be shut out of the international banking system and U.S. markets. U.S. Senators rail against Apple, Google and Microsoft for not repatriating profits earned from overseas operations. Bills are introduced in Congress that will attempt to prevent inversions whereby domestic corporations attempt to realign ownership so that the entity becomes foreign.
Hidden in the background is the relentless assault against past practices through the issuance of more restrictive regulations. One example concerns notational principal contracts (NPC). One type of NPC, known as Total Return Swap, was designed to pass U.S. source dividend to a non-U.S. investor without causing income tax withholding to be imposed on the outbound payment.
In 2010, Congress, enacted IRC§871(m) to impose a withholding obligation on dividend equivalent payments. Such payments include substitute dividend payments and certain NPCs. The seven factor test contained in the 2010 draft regulations has been replaced with an objective test which measures certain changes. In the most elementary terms, if the derivative contract produces substantially the same economic result as outright ownership, the contract is subject to these rules.
The objective test applies to equity linked investments (ELI) that produce the same return without income tax withholding as would direct ownership of the underlying stock and receipt of the dividend net of withholding.
The essence of NPCs and ELI’s is that a foreign customer contacts a bank and states that it wants to buy shares in a domestic corporation. The bank constructs a contract that takes into account charges at the price of a stock over time and its dividend. This contract simulates ownership of the security itself but does not suffer withholding taxes because the dividend is received by the bank, a domestic taxpayer. The new rules evaluate the payments to be made based on changes in price and dividends received to classify these contracts as being subject to withholding. The new regulations apply to other investments, as well.
It remains to be seen what impact this will have on domestic banks and what other techniques evolve.
If you have any questions about this post or would like to discuss your company’s tax,trust, and estate matters , please contact me, James F. McDonough at ScarinciHollenbeck.com.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Related Posts
See all
Does Your Homeowners Insurance Provide Adequate Coverage?
Your home is likely your greatest asset, which is why it is so important to adequately protect it. Homeowners insurance protects you from the financial costs of unforeseen losses, such as theft, fire, and natural disasters, by helping you rebuild and replace possessions that were lost While the definition of “adequate” coverage depends upon a […]
Author: Jesse M. Dimitro
Understanding the Importance of a Non-Contingent Offer
Making a non-contingent offer can dramatically increase your chances of securing a real estate transaction, particularly in competitive markets like New York City. However, buyers should understand that waiving contingencies, including those related to financing, or appraisals, also comes with significant risks. Determining your best strategy requires careful analysis of the property, the market, and […]
Author: Jesse M. Dimitro
Fred D. Zemel Appointed Chair of Strategic Planning at Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC
Business Transactional Attorney Zemel to Spearhead Strategic Initiatives for Continued Growth and Innovation Little Falls, NJ – February 21, 2025 – Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC is pleased to announce that Partner Fred D. Zemel has been named Chair of the firm’s Strategic Planning Committee. In this role, Mr. Zemel will lead the committee in identifying, […]
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Novation Agreement Process: Step-by-Step Guide for Businesses
Big changes sometimes occur during the life cycle of a contract. Cancelling a contract outright can be bad for your reputation and your bottom line. Businesses need to know how to best address a change in circumstances, while also protecting their legal rights. One option is to transfer the “benefits and the burdens” of a […]
Author: Dan Brecher
What Is a Trade Secret? Key Elements and Legal Protections Explained
What is a trade secret and why you you protect them? Technology has made trade secret theft even easier and more prevalent. In fact, businesses lose billions of dollars every year due to trade secret theft committed by employees, competitors, and even foreign governments. But what is a trade secret? And how do you protect […]
Author: Ronald S. Bienstock
What Is Title Insurance? Safeguarding Against Title Defects
If you are considering the purchase of a property, you may wonder — what is title insurance, do I need it, and why do I need it? Even seasoned property owners may question if the added expense and extra paperwork is really necessary, especially considering that people and entities insured by title insurance make fewer […]
Author: Patrick T. Conlon
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
International Tax Trends
Author: James F. McDonough
It is easy to discern a trend, especially in international taxation. One of the largest Swiss banks plead guilty to criminal charges for helping U.S. taxpayers avoid income taxes.
Countries continue to enter into FACTA agreements with the U.S. rather than be shut out of the international banking system and U.S. markets. U.S. Senators rail against Apple, Google and Microsoft for not repatriating profits earned from overseas operations. Bills are introduced in Congress that will attempt to prevent inversions whereby domestic corporations attempt to realign ownership so that the entity becomes foreign.
Hidden in the background is the relentless assault against past practices through the issuance of more restrictive regulations. One example concerns notational principal contracts (NPC). One type of NPC, known as Total Return Swap, was designed to pass U.S. source dividend to a non-U.S. investor without causing income tax withholding to be imposed on the outbound payment.
In 2010, Congress, enacted IRC§871(m) to impose a withholding obligation on dividend equivalent payments. Such payments include substitute dividend payments and certain NPCs. The seven factor test contained in the 2010 draft regulations has been replaced with an objective test which measures certain changes. In the most elementary terms, if the derivative contract produces substantially the same economic result as outright ownership, the contract is subject to these rules.
The objective test applies to equity linked investments (ELI) that produce the same return without income tax withholding as would direct ownership of the underlying stock and receipt of the dividend net of withholding.
The essence of NPCs and ELI’s is that a foreign customer contacts a bank and states that it wants to buy shares in a domestic corporation. The bank constructs a contract that takes into account charges at the price of a stock over time and its dividend. This contract simulates ownership of the security itself but does not suffer withholding taxes because the dividend is received by the bank, a domestic taxpayer. The new rules evaluate the payments to be made based on changes in price and dividends received to classify these contracts as being subject to withholding. The new regulations apply to other investments, as well.
It remains to be seen what impact this will have on domestic banks and what other techniques evolve.
If you have any questions about this post or would like to discuss your company’s tax,trust, and estate matters , please contact me, James F. McDonough at ScarinciHollenbeck.com.