
James F. McDonough
Of Counsel
732-568-8360 jmcdonough@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: James F. McDonough
Date: August 4, 2014
Of Counsel
732-568-8360 jmcdonough@sh-law.comCorporate inversions, in which a U.S.-based multinational acquires a smaller, foreign firm in order to re-domicile in a new, lower-tax country, have become a serious issue in American politics recently. Now, it appears that this issue may be a powerful motivator in the upcoming midterm House and Senate elections this November, according to The Wall Street Journal
A renewed push coming from the White House brought the issue even further into the public spotlight, alongside a coordinated drive from the Democratic party to effect legislation that will limit or halt the practice, the news source explained. Many Republicans agree that the issue should be addressed, but are halting bills that would curb the practice, hoping instead for a complete overhaul of the corporate income tax. These right-wing politicians note that the U.S. has the highest on-paper corporate income tax rate in the developed world. They say that they haven’t seen any proposals from the White House that would solve the problem.
Democrats have made a number of proposals that would alter the corporate tax code, including one that would change the requirement regarding the acquired company’s ownership share of the joint company that is created in an inversion, according to the Journal. Currently, the requirement is that the foreign company’s shareholders must be given at least a 20 percent share in the new company, meaning that it is frequently in the best interests of shareholders in the U.S. company to give up a portion of their shares in exchange for a significantly lower tax burden. A proposal from Sen. Carl Levin, D-Michigan, would raise this requirement to 50 percent.
“This is an issue that understandably gets people very angry,” Rep. Chris Van Hollen, D-Maryland, told the news source. “If Republicans are going to oppose our efforts in this area, they are going to have to explain why they are shielding American corporations that are deserting the U.S. in order to dodge their obligations to the country and American taxpayers.”
It seems that 2014 is the year of corporate tax inversions. Frank Brunetti and I have written about this topic at tremendous length due to all the new information brought to light about this subject. Find out more about the companies involved in corporate tax inversion and what Washington is doing about it here:
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Your home is likely your greatest asset, which is why it is so important to adequately protect it. Homeowners insurance protects you from the financial costs of unforeseen losses, such as theft, fire, and natural disasters, by helping you rebuild and replace possessions that were lost While the definition of “adequate” coverage depends upon a […]
Author: Jesse M. Dimitro
Making a non-contingent offer can dramatically increase your chances of securing a real estate transaction, particularly in competitive markets like New York City. However, buyers should understand that waiving contingencies, including those related to financing, or appraisals, also comes with significant risks. Determining your best strategy requires careful analysis of the property, the market, and […]
Author: Jesse M. Dimitro
Business Transactional Attorney Zemel to Spearhead Strategic Initiatives for Continued Growth and Innovation Little Falls, NJ – February 21, 2025 – Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC is pleased to announce that Partner Fred D. Zemel has been named Chair of the firm’s Strategic Planning Committee. In this role, Mr. Zemel will lead the committee in identifying, […]
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Big changes sometimes occur during the life cycle of a contract. Cancelling a contract outright can be bad for your reputation and your bottom line. Businesses need to know how to best address a change in circumstances, while also protecting their legal rights. One option is to transfer the “benefits and the burdens” of a […]
Author: Dan Brecher
What is a trade secret and why you you protect them? Technology has made trade secret theft even easier and more prevalent. In fact, businesses lose billions of dollars every year due to trade secret theft committed by employees, competitors, and even foreign governments. But what is a trade secret? And how do you protect […]
Author: Ronald S. Bienstock
If you are considering the purchase of a property, you may wonder — what is title insurance, do I need it, and why do I need it? Even seasoned property owners may question if the added expense and extra paperwork is really necessary, especially considering that people and entities insured by title insurance make fewer […]
Author: Patrick T. Conlon
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Corporate inversions, in which a U.S.-based multinational acquires a smaller, foreign firm in order to re-domicile in a new, lower-tax country, have become a serious issue in American politics recently. Now, it appears that this issue may be a powerful motivator in the upcoming midterm House and Senate elections this November, according to The Wall Street Journal
A renewed push coming from the White House brought the issue even further into the public spotlight, alongside a coordinated drive from the Democratic party to effect legislation that will limit or halt the practice, the news source explained. Many Republicans agree that the issue should be addressed, but are halting bills that would curb the practice, hoping instead for a complete overhaul of the corporate income tax. These right-wing politicians note that the U.S. has the highest on-paper corporate income tax rate in the developed world. They say that they haven’t seen any proposals from the White House that would solve the problem.
Democrats have made a number of proposals that would alter the corporate tax code, including one that would change the requirement regarding the acquired company’s ownership share of the joint company that is created in an inversion, according to the Journal. Currently, the requirement is that the foreign company’s shareholders must be given at least a 20 percent share in the new company, meaning that it is frequently in the best interests of shareholders in the U.S. company to give up a portion of their shares in exchange for a significantly lower tax burden. A proposal from Sen. Carl Levin, D-Michigan, would raise this requirement to 50 percent.
“This is an issue that understandably gets people very angry,” Rep. Chris Van Hollen, D-Maryland, told the news source. “If Republicans are going to oppose our efforts in this area, they are going to have to explain why they are shielding American corporations that are deserting the U.S. in order to dodge their obligations to the country and American taxpayers.”
It seems that 2014 is the year of corporate tax inversions. Frank Brunetti and I have written about this topic at tremendous length due to all the new information brought to light about this subject. Find out more about the companies involved in corporate tax inversion and what Washington is doing about it here:
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!