Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Date: May 12, 2014
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comIn the wake of a spate of corporate inversions over the last two years, regulators are considering ways to curb the use of this tax strategy, under which corporations move overseas to enjoy lower income tax rates. On April 30, a U.S. Treasury official told Reuters that the Obama administration is focused on ways to curb tax-motivated inversions.
“Cracking down on companies that reincorporate overseas to reduce their U.S. taxes is a priority for the administration,” the official told the news source in an emailed statement. “Inversion transactions illustrate the need for comprehensive business tax reform that would lower corporate tax rates and limit the ability of multinationals to shift income outside the U.S.”
This focus comes on the heels of two companies’ announcements that they were pursuing inversions with overseas rivals, including Pfizer and Omnicom Group Inc., the largest U.S. advertising company, Reuters explained. The IRS issued a notice April 25 limiting shareholders’ tax free treatment in these deals.
Despite this focus, IRS commissioner John Koskinen announced April 30 that the government probably can’t take regulatory action to stop companies from undergoing inversions, according to Bloomberg.
“We’ve done, I think, probably all we can within the statute,” Koskinen, 74, told reporters in Washington, the news source reported. “We try to make sure people are within the bounds, but if they’re within the bounds, if they play according to the rules, then they have a right to do that.”
Koskinen’s announcement demonstrates the limits of the Obama administration’s ability to effect tax reform without Congress, which remains deadlocked on tax issues, Bloomberg explained. In response to the recent string of inversions, U.S. lawmakers have spoken about the importance of making broad changes to the tax code, but these are likely to be months or years away from reality.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Your home is likely your greatest asset, which is why it is so important to adequately protect it. Homeowners insurance protects you from the financial costs of unforeseen losses, such as theft, fire, and natural disasters, by helping you rebuild and replace possessions that were lost While the definition of “adequate” coverage depends upon a […]
Author: Jesse M. Dimitro
Making a non-contingent offer can dramatically increase your chances of securing a real estate transaction, particularly in competitive markets like New York City. However, buyers should understand that waiving contingencies, including those related to financing, or appraisals, also comes with significant risks. Determining your best strategy requires careful analysis of the property, the market, and […]
Author: Jesse M. Dimitro
Business Transactional Attorney Zemel to Spearhead Strategic Initiatives for Continued Growth and Innovation Little Falls, NJ – February 21, 2025 – Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC is pleased to announce that Partner Fred D. Zemel has been named Chair of the firm’s Strategic Planning Committee. In this role, Mr. Zemel will lead the committee in identifying, […]
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Big changes sometimes occur during the life cycle of a contract. Cancelling a contract outright can be bad for your reputation and your bottom line. Businesses need to know how to best address a change in circumstances, while also protecting their legal rights. One option is to transfer the “benefits and the burdens” of a […]
Author: Dan Brecher
What is a trade secret and why you you protect them? Technology has made trade secret theft even easier and more prevalent. In fact, businesses lose billions of dollars every year due to trade secret theft committed by employees, competitors, and even foreign governments. But what is a trade secret? And how do you protect […]
Author: Ronald S. Bienstock
If you are considering the purchase of a property, you may wonder — what is title insurance, do I need it, and why do I need it? Even seasoned property owners may question if the added expense and extra paperwork is really necessary, especially considering that people and entities insured by title insurance make fewer […]
Author: Patrick T. Conlon
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
In the wake of a spate of corporate inversions over the last two years, regulators are considering ways to curb the use of this tax strategy, under which corporations move overseas to enjoy lower income tax rates. On April 30, a U.S. Treasury official told Reuters that the Obama administration is focused on ways to curb tax-motivated inversions.
“Cracking down on companies that reincorporate overseas to reduce their U.S. taxes is a priority for the administration,” the official told the news source in an emailed statement. “Inversion transactions illustrate the need for comprehensive business tax reform that would lower corporate tax rates and limit the ability of multinationals to shift income outside the U.S.”
This focus comes on the heels of two companies’ announcements that they were pursuing inversions with overseas rivals, including Pfizer and Omnicom Group Inc., the largest U.S. advertising company, Reuters explained. The IRS issued a notice April 25 limiting shareholders’ tax free treatment in these deals.
Despite this focus, IRS commissioner John Koskinen announced April 30 that the government probably can’t take regulatory action to stop companies from undergoing inversions, according to Bloomberg.
“We’ve done, I think, probably all we can within the statute,” Koskinen, 74, told reporters in Washington, the news source reported. “We try to make sure people are within the bounds, but if they’re within the bounds, if they play according to the rules, then they have a right to do that.”
Koskinen’s announcement demonstrates the limits of the Obama administration’s ability to effect tax reform without Congress, which remains deadlocked on tax issues, Bloomberg explained. In response to the recent string of inversions, U.S. lawmakers have spoken about the importance of making broad changes to the tax code, but these are likely to be months or years away from reality.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!