
James F. McDonough
Of Counsel
732-568-8360 jmcdonough@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: James F. McDonough
Date: March 18, 2013

Of Counsel
732-568-8360 jmcdonough@sh-law.comThe Internal Revenue Service has been trying to close the multibillion-dollar tax gap through voluntary disclosure programs, amnesty initiatives and a higher number of audits in recent years. However, the recent across-the-board spending cuts that reduced the operating budgets of several federal agencies may have an impact on the tax agency’s ability to go after tax law violators, the IRS reports.
In a staff memo obtained by ABC News, IRS Commissioner Steven Miller wrote that the spending cuts would not impact individual and business tax return processing or refunds. However, employee furloughs, reduced hours and fewer resources to train IRS workers may result in fewer audits as they will have less staff to perform the reviews, he noted. However, reduced auditing may only impact individual filers and self-employed business owners rather than corporations and offshore tax evaders.
The IRS has entered into a number of agreements with foreign governments to help them combat tax evasion committed by Americans, which may allow them to keep up their efforts without draining their budgets. In addition, those with offshore accounts typically offer the biggest potential for chipping away at the tax gap at a more significant level.
However, the sequester also impacted another area that greatly facilitated the detection and prosecution of offshore tax evaders and corporate tax law violations: the whistleblower program. The agency announced it will be cutting whistleblower rewards by 8.7 percent as a result of the cuts. Some analysts argue that the reduction may discourage informants from coming forward, which could lead to lost opportunities for the agency to catch violators and recoup lost income, interest and penalties.
The furloughs are expected to go into effect during the summer, following the end of tax season.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Case law following the 2010 amendments to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26 offers guidance on how courts are likely to address whether an expert witness’s AI records are subject to discovery. Key Takeaways Rule 26 Expert Discovery After the 2010 Amendments This article addresses the question courts and lawyers have faced in recent cases: […]
Author: Chris Seelinger

“Show how 3M is 0% at fault.” The absurd tale of how a 350-page ChatGPT history for 3M’s expert witness was produced during a deposition is more likely than you think. It’s an inevitable trend, and an unsettled question for federal courts as experts make generative AI part of their workflow. Key Takeaways Expert Witness […]
Author: Chris Seelinger

Screenshots have changed the risks of electronic communications. The screenshot problem is that messages intended for one person or a small group can be copied, forwarded, preserved, and ultimately presented to opposing counsel, regulators, journalists, customers, or a jury. Businesses should recognize that a truly private digital conversation is increasingly unreliable and ensure their policies, […]
Author: Sean M. Pena

Developers, engineering, procurement, and construction (EPC) contractors, and equipment suppliers each play a critical role in completing a BESS project. However, when equipment costs rise, deliveries are delayed, or regulations change, determining who bears the financial consequences can become contentious. Well-drafted project agreements are essential to sound risk allocation. Key Takeaways This article is Part […]
Author: Nicholas Wall

IP infringement occurs when someone uses your intellectual property without your permission or beyond the scope of the permission you granted. Common examples of IP infringement include copying a product’s patented features or using a trademarked logo in a way that is likely to confuse consumers about the source or affiliation of goods or services. […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki

When facing public allegations of wrongdoing, companies should not let the speed of the public conversation dictate the speed of an investigation. An investigation designed to confirm a preferred narrative rather than establish the facts can create serious problems later, particularly if litigation, regulatory scrutiny, or employment claims follow. Key Takeaways When public allegations surface […]
Author: Sean M. Pena
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!