
Joel R. Glucksman
Partner
201-896-7095 jglucksman@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Joel R. Glucksman
Date: October 10, 2013

Partner
201-896-7095 jglucksman@sh-law.comBlackberry Ltd. has fallen on difficult times, and if its ongoing bid to find a buyer to take the company private fails, some analysts speculate that the company may be forced to reorganize under Chapter 11 of the bankruptcy law.
Currently, the smartphone maker is negotiating a potential deal with Canadian insurance and investment company Fairfax Financial Holdings, which has made a $4.7 billion bid for Blackberry. Fairfax currently owns roughly 10 percent of Blackberry’s common shares. However, there is some skepticism as to whether Fairfax will be able to close the deal. The investment firm submitted a letter of intent to acquire the company, but has yet to line up the necessary financing to make the purchase.
Blackberry’s patents and licenses are currently valued at roughly $2.8 billion, leaving Fairfax to borrow roughly $2 billion to fund the buyout, Bloomberg reports.
Blackberry has been on the decline for several years, particularly as it failed to introduce new innovations or features at the same time that the iPhone was rising in popularity. The company’s cash balance plummeted $500 million to $2.6 billion last quarter, and the company is expected to pose a quarterly loss of nearly $1 billion during the fourth quarter of this year. In addition, the smartphone maker said it planned to lay off roughly 40 percent of its workforce, or 4,500 people.
The company’s weakened financial position has caused its credit profile to mirror that of a junk-rated company, Bloomberg notes. Marc Gross, a financial manager at RS Investments, told the news source that investors are only likely to purchase debt if it’s backed by Blackberry’s patents – currently its most lucrative assets – and even this scenario may depend on how much they could recover should the company seek bankruptcy protection.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Case law following the 2010 amendments to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26 offers guidance on how courts are likely to address whether an expert witness’s AI records are subject to discovery. Key Takeaways Rule 26 Expert Discovery After the 2010 Amendments This article addresses the question courts and lawyers have faced in recent cases: […]
Author: Chris Seelinger

“Show how 3M is 0% at fault.” The absurd tale of how a 350-page ChatGPT history for 3M’s expert witness was produced during a deposition is more likely than you think. It’s an inevitable trend, and an unsettled question for federal courts as experts make generative AI part of their workflow. Key Takeaways Expert Witness […]
Author: Chris Seelinger

Screenshots have changed the risks of electronic communications. The screenshot problem is that messages intended for one person or a small group can be copied, forwarded, preserved, and ultimately presented to opposing counsel, regulators, journalists, customers, or a jury. Businesses should recognize that a truly private digital conversation is increasingly unreliable and ensure their policies, […]
Author: Sean M. Pena

Developers, engineering, procurement, and construction (EPC) contractors, and equipment suppliers each play a critical role in completing a BESS project. However, when equipment costs rise, deliveries are delayed, or regulations change, determining who bears the financial consequences can become contentious. Well-drafted project agreements are essential to sound risk allocation. Key Takeaways This article is Part […]
Author: Nicholas Wall

IP infringement occurs when someone uses your intellectual property without your permission or beyond the scope of the permission you granted. Common examples of IP infringement include copying a product’s patented features or using a trademarked logo in a way that is likely to confuse consumers about the source or affiliation of goods or services. […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki

When facing public allegations of wrongdoing, companies should not let the speed of the public conversation dictate the speed of an investigation. An investigation designed to confirm a preferred narrative rather than establish the facts can create serious problems later, particularly if litigation, regulatory scrutiny, or employment claims follow. Key Takeaways When public allegations surface […]
Author: Sean M. Pena
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!