Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Date: October 2, 2020
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comThe perfect storm of COVID-19 and the flu is expected to descend on New York and New Jersey this fall. Employers understandably want to take all reasonable precautions to keep their workers safe. But can they require employers to get vaccinations?

To date, federal and state agencies have not issued guidance regarding future COVID-19 vaccination. However, agencies like the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) have addressed the annual flu vaccine. State also have statutes that dictate who must receive an annual flu shot.
Eighteen states have enacted flu vaccination requirements for hospital healthcare workers, and 16 states establish requirements for hospital patients. New Jersey only mandates flu shots for small children. It does not require workers, even those in the healthcare industry, to get vaccinated against influenza.
The New York State Department of Health requires that all workers of healthcare and residential facilities who could potentially expose patients or residents to influenza either receive seasonal influenza vaccinations or wear a surgical mask during the period when influenza is prevalent in New York State (as determined by the state’s Commissioner of Health). New York also mandates flu shots for young children who attend daycare, Head Start, pre-K or nursery school.
In the absence of regulations, employers are free to establish their own workplace vaccination policies. However, to avoid facing legal liability, mandatory flu vaccination policies must provide for exceptions, as well as outline the steps that workers must take to rely on them.
For instance, an employee may be entitled to an exemption from a mandatory vaccination requirement based on a medical condition that prevents him from taking the influenza vaccine. Under the Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA), employers must provide a reasonable accommodation barring undue hardship, i.e. significant difficulty or expense. Similarly, under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, once an employer receives notice that an employee’s sincerely held religious belief, practice, or observance prevents him from taking the influenza vaccine, the employer must provide a reasonable accommodation unless it would pose more than a de minimis hardship.
Employers that do not want to require vaccination can still strongly recommend that employees get a flu shot. To bolster these efforts and facilitate the process, employers can run a free flu shot clinic on site, offer “prizes” for workers who elect to get vaccinated, and allow workers to take paid time off to get vaccinated.
Given that COVID-19 can lead to lengthy employee absences and even force business closures, the benefits of a safe and effective coronavirus vaccine will be significant. Once inoculated, workers likely will hopefully be able to fully return to the office, interact with customers, and travel freely. Nonetheless, employers should carefully review any regulatory guidance that may be available before establishing a policy regarding COVID-19 vaccination. Much like the flu shot, employers will likely be required to allow employees to opt out of COVID-19 vaccination if they have medical or religious objections. At the same time, employers will also be likely to bolster vaccination by offering free vaccination at the workplace, much like flu shots.
If you have any questions or if you would like to discuss the matter further, please contact me, Maryam Meseha, or the Scarinci Hollenbeck attorney with whom you work, at 201-896-4100.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Case law following the 2010 amendments to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26 offers guidance on how courts are likely to address whether an expert witness’s AI records are subject to discovery. Key Takeaways Rule 26 Expert Discovery After the 2010 Amendments This article addresses the question courts and lawyers have faced in recent cases: […]
Author: Chris Seelinger

“Show how 3M is 0% at fault.” The absurd tale of how a 350-page ChatGPT history for 3M’s expert witness was produced during a deposition is more likely than you think. It’s an inevitable trend, and an unsettled question for federal courts as experts make generative AI part of their workflow. Key Takeaways Expert Witness […]
Author: Chris Seelinger

Screenshots have changed the risks of electronic communications. The screenshot problem is that messages intended for one person or a small group can be copied, forwarded, preserved, and ultimately presented to opposing counsel, regulators, journalists, customers, or a jury. Businesses should recognize that a truly private digital conversation is increasingly unreliable and ensure their policies, […]
Author: Sean M. Pena

Developers, engineering, procurement, and construction (EPC) contractors, and equipment suppliers each play a critical role in completing a BESS project. However, when equipment costs rise, deliveries are delayed, or regulations change, determining who bears the financial consequences can become contentious. Well-drafted project agreements are essential to sound risk allocation. Key Takeaways This article is Part […]
Author: Nicholas Wall

IP infringement occurs when someone uses your intellectual property without your permission or beyond the scope of the permission you granted. Common examples of IP infringement include copying a product’s patented features or using a trademarked logo in a way that is likely to confuse consumers about the source or affiliation of goods or services. […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki

When facing public allegations of wrongdoing, companies should not let the speed of the public conversation dictate the speed of an investigation. An investigation designed to confirm a preferred narrative rather than establish the facts can create serious problems later, particularly if litigation, regulatory scrutiny, or employment claims follow. Key Takeaways When public allegations surface […]
Author: Sean M. Pena
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!