
Joel R. Glucksman
Partner
201-896-7095 jglucksman@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Joel R. Glucksman
Date: March 27, 2014

Partner
201-896-7095 jglucksman@sh-law.comBroadband company LightSquared urged U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Shelley Chapman on March 17 to find that its largest creditor, Dish Network Corp Chairman Charles Ergen, acquired his $850 million stake in the company improperly, according to Reuters. The outcome of the case between the company and Ergen – the closing arguments for which were heard March 17 – is likely to influence the nature of the company’s wireless rights moving forward. LightSquared filed for protection under Chapter 11 of the bankruptcy law not long ago, proposing a plan of reorganization that is contingent upon a favorable ruling in the company’s lawsuit against Ergen.
Dish Network Corp is a direct competitor of LightSquared, and as such would have been barred from acquiring this debt, according to the New York Post. Instead, Ergen himself bought the $850 million controlling share of the company’s senior loan with $700 million of his personal money, a move that was intended to pave the way for Ergen’s company to purchase LightSquared’s spectrum cheaply, the company’s lawyers argue.
LightSquared’s lawyers feel that Ergen should lose his entire stake in the company, according to the news source – a decision which rests with Judge Chapman. Ergen’s lawyer, Rachel Strickland, argues that the mogul shouldn’t lose any of his investment, because he did nothing to damage the company or influence its bankruptcy. She argues that Phil Falcone, one of the company’s chief investors, welcomed the Chapter 11 filing, because it will give him more time as he awaits an FCC resolution that would allow him to retain his equity. Further, Strickland asserts that Falcone manipulated the company’s debt to preserve Ergen’s share in the company’s debt.
“There’s got to be a consequence,” the judge told Ergen, according to the news source. “You know how you tell children there’s a consequence to doing wrong?”
Chapman also had harsh words for LightSquared, according to Reuters.
“No one called 911,” she said. “No one said, ‘Help, there’s a competitor in my capital
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Case law following the 2010 amendments to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26 offers guidance on how courts are likely to address whether an expert witness’s AI records are subject to discovery. Key Takeaways Rule 26 Expert Discovery After the 2010 Amendments This article addresses the question courts and lawyers have faced in recent cases: […]
Author: Chris Seelinger

“Show how 3M is 0% at fault.” The absurd tale of how a 350-page ChatGPT history for 3M’s expert witness was produced during a deposition is more likely than you think. It’s an inevitable trend, and an unsettled question for federal courts as experts make generative AI part of their workflow. Key Takeaways Expert Witness […]
Author: Chris Seelinger

Screenshots have changed the risks of electronic communications. The screenshot problem is that messages intended for one person or a small group can be copied, forwarded, preserved, and ultimately presented to opposing counsel, regulators, journalists, customers, or a jury. Businesses should recognize that a truly private digital conversation is increasingly unreliable and ensure their policies, […]
Author: Sean M. Pena

Developers, engineering, procurement, and construction (EPC) contractors, and equipment suppliers each play a critical role in completing a BESS project. However, when equipment costs rise, deliveries are delayed, or regulations change, determining who bears the financial consequences can become contentious. Well-drafted project agreements are essential to sound risk allocation. Key Takeaways This article is Part […]
Author: Nicholas Wall

IP infringement occurs when someone uses your intellectual property without your permission or beyond the scope of the permission you granted. Common examples of IP infringement include copying a product’s patented features or using a trademarked logo in a way that is likely to confuse consumers about the source or affiliation of goods or services. […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki

When facing public allegations of wrongdoing, companies should not let the speed of the public conversation dictate the speed of an investigation. An investigation designed to confirm a preferred narrative rather than establish the facts can create serious problems later, particularly if litigation, regulatory scrutiny, or employment claims follow. Key Takeaways When public allegations surface […]
Author: Sean M. Pena
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!