James F. McDonough
Of Counsel
732-568-8360 jmcdonough@sh-law.comKey Contacts
Back
The Madoff scandal is no longer the lead story on the evening news; however, the ripple effect of the scandal remains with us even today.
In Estate of Warshaw v. Director, the Superior Court of New Jersey Appellate Division (“Appellate Division”) reversed the decision of the Tax Court of New Jersey that granted the estate a tax refund. The descendent died in 2006 and his executors filed a New Jersey Estate Tax Return in July 2007 paying tax on the value of an IRA that was managed by Bernard L. Madoff Securities LLC. The value of the IRA was provided to the estate by the custodian, an entity controlled by Mr. Bernard Madoff. You may recall that Mr. Madoff was arrested in December 2008 and he pled guilty to various charges on March 12, 2009.
In January 2009, the estate filed a claim for refund of estate taxes because the IRA was always worthless, even before death. The Division of Taxation (the “Division”) denied the refund claim and the estate sued in Tax Court. The Tax Court decision ordered the Division to pay the refund. The Division appealed and won a reversal in the Appellate Division. The Appellate Division held that no one had knowledge of the Ponzi scheme at the date of death; therefore, the value of the IRA for New Jersey estate tax purposes was the overstated value reported by the custodian.
The Warshaw case is an example of when and to what extent post-death events are considered in valuing assets for estate tax purposes. This area is unsettled and taxpayers may not find consistency between state and federal decisions.
- Practices: Tax and Trusts & Estates, Estate & Trust Litigation, Real Property Tax Strategies, Sophisticated Estate Planning & Wealth Preservation
- Locations: Red Bank, NJ, New York City, Little Falls, NJ
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Related Posts
See all
Rule 26 Expert Discovery: When an Expert Witness Uses AI, Is It Discoverable?
Case law following the 2010 amendments to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26 offers guidance on how courts are likely to address whether an expert witness’s AI records are subject to discovery. Key Takeaways Rule 26 Expert Discovery After the 2010 Amendments This article addresses the question courts and lawyers have faced in recent cases: […]
Author: Chris Seelinger
How Expert Witness AI Use Ends Up in Discovery
“Show how 3M is 0% at fault.” The absurd tale of how a 350-page ChatGPT history for 3M’s expert witness was produced during a deposition is more likely than you think. It’s an inevitable trend, and an unsettled question for federal courts as experts make generative AI part of their workflow. Key Takeaways Expert Witness […]
Author: Chris Seelinger
The Screenshot Problem: Why Nothing Is Really Private Anymore
Screenshots have changed the risks of electronic communications. The screenshot problem is that messages intended for one person or a small group can be copied, forwarded, preserved, and ultimately presented to opposing counsel, regulators, journalists, customers, or a jury. Businesses should recognize that a truly private digital conversation is increasingly unreliable and ensure their policies, […]
Author: Sean M. Pena
BESS Project Agreements: Allocating Risk Among Developers, EPC Contractors, and Equipment Suppliers
Developers, engineering, procurement, and construction (EPC) contractors, and equipment suppliers each play a critical role in completing a BESS project. However, when equipment costs rise, deliveries are delayed, or regulations change, determining who bears the financial consequences can become contentious. Well-drafted project agreements are essential to sound risk allocation. Key Takeaways This article is Part […]
Author: Nicholas Wall
IP Infringement: What Steps Can You Take If You're Affected?
IP infringement occurs when someone uses your intellectual property without your permission or beyond the scope of the permission you granted. Common examples of IP infringement include copying a product’s patented features or using a trademarked logo in a way that is likely to confuse consumers about the source or affiliation of goods or services. […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki
Public Allegations, Unfinished Investigation: What New Jersey Businesses Should Do Next
When facing public allegations of wrongdoing, companies should not let the speed of the public conversation dictate the speed of an investigation. An investigation designed to confirm a preferred narrative rather than establish the facts can create serious problems later, particularly if litigation, regulatory scrutiny, or employment claims follow. Key Takeaways When public allegations surface […]
Author: Sean M. Pena
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.