With this new rule passed, will New York commercial litigation settlements become the norm for resolution?
Commercial litigation is often contentious. Yet the large majority of cases are still resolved short of going to trial – this is where commercial litigation settlements will come into play.In the State of New York, a new rule recently took effect that is intended to encourage court-facilitated settlement discussions. In cases heard by the Commercial Division of the Supreme Court, the parties can now jointly request the court to appoint a judge, other than the one assigned to hear the case, to conduct a settlement conference.
The new rule encouraging commercial litigation settlements
The amended Rule 22 NYCRR 202.70(g) specifically states:
Should counsel wish to proceed with a settlement conference before a justice other than the justice assigned to the case, counsel may jointly request that the assigned justice grant a separate settlement conference. This request may be made at any time in the litigation. Such a request will be granted in the discretion of the justice assigned to the case upon finding that a separate settlement conference would be beneficial to the parties and the court and would further the interests of justice. If the request is granted, the assigned justice shall make appropriate arrangements for the designation of a “settlement judge.”
As highlighted by the Commercial Division Advisory Council, the rule is intended to encourage candid settlement discussions “without telegraphing the weaknesses in a case to the presiding trial judge.” The rule also aims to assist trial judges who are often reluctant to get involved in negotiations of a matter that they may ultimately be asked to decide. In support of the rule, the Council also noted that the practice is used on the federal level, where district court judges routinely assign a magistrate judge or an independent court-appointed mediator to hear settlement conferences.
Why the new rule is good
As we have discussed on our Business Law News Blog, there are several advantages of negotiating a settlement. Most notably, the parties control their own destiny and have complete control over the terms of the agreement. No matter how strong a case may appear on paper, going to trial always requires a roll of the dice.Settlement may present the most practical option. For instance, resolving business litigation out of court is almost always more cost-effective and will always take less time than a trial. In addition, settlement often allows the two sides to explore more creative solutions, such as payments over time, or exchanging different assets from those in dispute. By comparison, courts can be handicapped by statutes and legal precedent.
Are you considering settlement as an alternative? Do you have any questions regarding the matter? Please contact me, Dan Brecher.
Crypto Securities Law: When Tokens Become Investment Contracts
The application of traditional federal securities laws to crypto assets continues to evolve. In some cases, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) considers tokens and other digital assets to be securities. This makes them subject to federal securities law, including the Securities Act of 1933 and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. This classification has […]
The Due Diligence Process for NY Condominiums and Cooperatives
While the New York City real estate market can be extremely competitive, moving too quickly often backfires. Before purchasing a condominium or cooperative in New York City, it is important to do you homework. Purchasing property in NYC can involve a dizzying number of legal issues. These include condo and co-op rules, rent restrictions, and […]
Smart Contract Legal Issues: Drafting Agreements for Blockchain
Smart contracts feature a unique blend of legal agreement and technical code. This innovation has the potential to reshape how business is conducted. At the same time, smart contract legal issues around enforceability, jurisdiction, identity, and compliance are common. The legal framework for these self-executing agreements is still evolving. What Are Smart Contracts? Smart contracts, […]
Are Stay Interviews the Key to Retaining Top Talent?
Retaining top talent continues to be one of the greatest challenges facing employers today. Even in an employer’s market, the loss of a key employee can disrupt operations and result in significant costs. While compensation plays a role, long-term retention often depends on workplace culture, communication, and employee engagement. One increasingly popular strategy for improving […]
Secured transactions form the backbone of a wide range of business dealings, including business loans, mortgages, and inventory financing. Because the stakes are often high and relatively minor oversights can have drastic consequences, lenders and borrowers should thoroughly understand how to form an enforceable security agreement that protects their legal rights. What Is a Secured […]
Don’t Cash a “Paid in Full” Check Without Understanding the Legal Implications
Cashing a check marked “paid in full” can be a risky endeavor, particularly if you don’t fully understanding the legal implications. If you are owed more than the amount of the check you accept and deposit, you may waive your right to collect the full disputed amount. That is why you should consider either rejecting […]
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!
