With this new rule passed, will New York commercial litigation settlements become the norm for resolution?
Commercial litigation is often contentious. Yet the large majority of cases are still resolved short of going to trial – this is where commercial litigation settlements will come into play.In the State of New York, a new rule recently took effect that is intended to encourage court-facilitated settlement discussions. In cases heard by the Commercial Division of the Supreme Court, the parties can now jointly request the court to appoint a judge, other than the one assigned to hear the case, to conduct a settlement conference.
The new rule encouraging commercial litigation settlements
The amended Rule 22 NYCRR 202.70(g) specifically states:
Should counsel wish to proceed with a settlement conference before a justice other than the justice assigned to the case, counsel may jointly request that the assigned justice grant a separate settlement conference. This request may be made at any time in the litigation. Such a request will be granted in the discretion of the justice assigned to the case upon finding that a separate settlement conference would be beneficial to the parties and the court and would further the interests of justice. If the request is granted, the assigned justice shall make appropriate arrangements for the designation of a “settlement judge.”
As highlighted by the Commercial Division Advisory Council, the rule is intended to encourage candid settlement discussions “without telegraphing the weaknesses in a case to the presiding trial judge.” The rule also aims to assist trial judges who are often reluctant to get involved in negotiations of a matter that they may ultimately be asked to decide. In support of the rule, the Council also noted that the practice is used on the federal level, where district court judges routinely assign a magistrate judge or an independent court-appointed mediator to hear settlement conferences.
Why the new rule is good
As we have discussed on our Business Law News Blog, there are several advantages of negotiating a settlement. Most notably, the parties control their own destiny and have complete control over the terms of the agreement. No matter how strong a case may appear on paper, going to trial always requires a roll of the dice.Settlement may present the most practical option. For instance, resolving business litigation out of court is almost always more cost-effective and will always take less time than a trial. In addition, settlement often allows the two sides to explore more creative solutions, such as payments over time, or exchanging different assets from those in dispute. By comparison, courts can be handicapped by statutes and legal precedent.
Are you considering settlement as an alternative? Do you have any questions regarding the matter? Please contact me, Dan Brecher.
Does Your Homeowners Insurance Provide Adequate Coverage?
Your home is likely your greatest asset, which is why it is so important to adequately protect it. Homeowners insurance protects you from the financial costs of unforeseen losses, such as theft, fire, and natural disasters, by helping you rebuild and replace possessions that were lost While the definition of “adequate” coverage depends upon a […]
Understanding the Importance of a Non-Contingent Offer
Making a non-contingent offer can dramatically increase your chances of securing a real estate transaction, particularly in competitive markets like New York City. However, buyers should understand that waiving contingencies, including those related to financing, or appraisals, also comes with significant risks. Determining your best strategy requires careful analysis of the property, the market, and […]
Fred D. Zemel Appointed Chair of Strategic Planning at Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC
Business Transactional Attorney Zemel to Spearhead Strategic Initiatives for Continued Growth and Innovation Little Falls, NJ – February 21, 2025 – Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC is pleased to announce that Partner Fred D. Zemel has been named Chair of the firm’s Strategic Planning Committee. In this role, Mr. Zemel will lead the committee in identifying, […]
Novation Agreement Process: Step-by-Step Guide for Businesses
Big changes sometimes occur during the life cycle of a contract. Cancelling a contract outright can be bad for your reputation and your bottom line. Businesses need to know how to best address a change in circumstances, while also protecting their legal rights. One option is to transfer the “benefits and the burdens” of a […]
What Is a Trade Secret? Key Elements and Legal Protections Explained
What is a trade secret and why you you protect them? Technology has made trade secret theft even easier and more prevalent. In fact, businesses lose billions of dollars every year due to trade secret theft committed by employees, competitors, and even foreign governments. But what is a trade secret? And how do you protect […]
What Is Title Insurance? Safeguarding Against Title Defects
If you are considering the purchase of a property, you may wonder — what is title insurance, do I need it, and why do I need it? Even seasoned property owners may question if the added expense and extra paperwork is really necessary, especially considering that people and entities insured by title insurance make fewer […]
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Will New York Commercial Litigation Settlements Increase?
Author: Dan Brecher
With this new rule passed, will New York commercial litigation settlements become the norm for resolution?
Commercial litigation is often contentious. Yet the large majority of cases are still resolved short of going to trial – this is where commercial litigation settlements will come into play.In the State of New York, a new rule recently took effect that is intended to encourage court-facilitated settlement discussions. In cases heard by the Commercial Division of the Supreme Court, the parties can now jointly request the court to appoint a judge, other than the one assigned to hear the case, to conduct a settlement conference.
The new rule encouraging commercial litigation settlements
The amended Rule 22 NYCRR 202.70(g) specifically states:
Should counsel wish to proceed with a settlement conference before a justice other than the justice assigned to the case, counsel may jointly request that the assigned justice grant a separate settlement conference. This request may be made at any time in the litigation. Such a request will be granted in the discretion of the justice assigned to the case upon finding that a separate settlement conference would be beneficial to the parties and the court and would further the interests of justice. If the request is granted, the assigned justice shall make appropriate arrangements for the designation of a “settlement judge.”
As highlighted by the Commercial Division Advisory Council, the rule is intended to encourage candid settlement discussions “without telegraphing the weaknesses in a case to the presiding trial judge.” The rule also aims to assist trial judges who are often reluctant to get involved in negotiations of a matter that they may ultimately be asked to decide. In support of the rule, the Council also noted that the practice is used on the federal level, where district court judges routinely assign a magistrate judge or an independent court-appointed mediator to hear settlement conferences.
Why the new rule is good
As we have discussed on our Business Law News Blog, there are several advantages of negotiating a settlement. Most notably, the parties control their own destiny and have complete control over the terms of the agreement. No matter how strong a case may appear on paper, going to trial always requires a roll of the dice.Settlement may present the most practical option. For instance, resolving business litigation out of court is almost always more cost-effective and will always take less time than a trial. In addition, settlement often allows the two sides to explore more creative solutions, such as payments over time, or exchanging different assets from those in dispute. By comparison, courts can be handicapped by statutes and legal precedent.
Are you considering settlement as an alternative? Do you have any questions regarding the matter? Please contact me, Dan Brecher.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!
