Non-compete agreements, also known as restrictive covenants, are employment contracts designed to limit the ability of an employee to compete with the employer by its stealing customers or trade secrets. Although somewhat controversial and frowned upon as being “restraints on trade,” most states permit such agreements (California is a notable exception).
Under current New Jersey law, enforceable non-compete agreements must strike a balance between protecting the employer’s legitimate business interests with the employee’s right to work in a field for which he or she is trained. In general, courts balance these considerations by examining the type and size of the business, how long and over what geographic area the restrictions apply and whether adequate consideration or benefit, was given the employee at the time the agreement was signed.
Legislation to outlaw certain types of non-compete agreements is currently pending in the New Jersey Assembly. The bill (A-3970), introduced on April 4, 2013, specifically applies to unemployment compensation.
The proposed NJ non-compete legislation would specifically invalidate any covenant, contract, or agreement not to compete, not to disclose, or not to solicit, entered into by an individual with the individual’s most recent employer, if the individual is found to be eligible for unemployment insurance benefits pursuant to New Jersey’s unemployment compensation law (N.J.S.A.43:21-1 et seq.) What is surprising is that non-solicitation and confidentiality restrictions are universally recognized as protecting the legitimate interests of employers.
Being eligible for unemployment benefits as a qualification is not exactly a “high bar” as New Jersey is considered one of the most liberal, give-away states when it comes to unemployment eligibility determinations. The bill does stipulate that the provisions of the bill will not apply to any covenant, contract, or agreement in effect on or before the date of the bill’s enactment. This will have only a limited duration as a qualification, however.
Although it is unclear if this legislation will advance, it appears to have some support in both the Assembly and the Senate. Therefore, New Jersey companies should keep it on their radar. Since the bill would not apply retroactively, it may be necessary to execute agreements in advance of the law’s effective date. Even better, employers should contact their legislative representatives and let them know that they oppose this change.
If you have any questions about the proposed legislation or how it may impact your operations, please contact me, Gary Young, or the Scarinci Hollenbeck attorney with whom you work.
Does Your Homeowners Insurance Provide Adequate Coverage?
Your home is likely your greatest asset, which is why it is so important to adequately protect it. Homeowners insurance protects you from the financial costs of unforeseen losses, such as theft, fire, and natural disasters, by helping you rebuild and replace possessions that were lost While the definition of “adequate” coverage depends upon a […]
Understanding the Importance of a Non-Contingent Offer
Making a non-contingent offer can dramatically increase your chances of securing a real estate transaction, particularly in competitive markets like New York City. However, buyers should understand that waiving contingencies, including those related to financing, or appraisals, also comes with significant risks. Determining your best strategy requires careful analysis of the property, the market, and […]
Fred D. Zemel Appointed Chair of Strategic Planning at Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC
Business Transactional Attorney Zemel to Spearhead Strategic Initiatives for Continued Growth and Innovation Little Falls, NJ – February 21, 2025 – Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC is pleased to announce that Partner Fred D. Zemel has been named Chair of the firm’s Strategic Planning Committee. In this role, Mr. Zemel will lead the committee in identifying, […]
Novation Agreement Process: Step-by-Step Guide for Businesses
Big changes sometimes occur during the life cycle of a contract. Cancelling a contract outright can be bad for your reputation and your bottom line. Businesses need to know how to best address a change in circumstances, while also protecting their legal rights. One option is to transfer the “benefits and the burdens” of a […]
What Is a Trade Secret? Key Elements and Legal Protections Explained
What is a trade secret and why you you protect them? Technology has made trade secret theft even easier and more prevalent. In fact, businesses lose billions of dollars every year due to trade secret theft committed by employees, competitors, and even foreign governments. But what is a trade secret? And how do you protect […]
What Is Title Insurance? Safeguarding Against Title Defects
If you are considering the purchase of a property, you may wonder — what is title insurance, do I need it, and why do I need it? Even seasoned property owners may question if the added expense and extra paperwork is really necessary, especially considering that people and entities insured by title insurance make fewer […]
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Are Certain Non-Compete Agreements on the Way Out in New Jersey?
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Non-compete agreements, also known as restrictive covenants, are employment contracts designed to limit the ability of an employee to compete with the employer by its stealing customers or trade secrets. Although somewhat controversial and frowned upon as being “restraints on trade,” most states permit such agreements (California is a notable exception).
Under current New Jersey law, enforceable non-compete agreements must strike a balance between protecting the employer’s legitimate business interests with the employee’s right to work in a field for which he or she is trained. In general, courts balance these considerations by examining the type and size of the business, how long and over what geographic area the restrictions apply and whether adequate consideration or benefit, was given the employee at the time the agreement was signed.
Legislation to outlaw certain types of non-compete agreements is currently pending in the New Jersey Assembly. The bill (A-3970), introduced on April 4, 2013, specifically applies to unemployment compensation.
The proposed NJ non-compete legislation would specifically invalidate any covenant, contract, or agreement not to compete, not to disclose, or not to solicit, entered into by an individual with the individual’s most recent employer, if the individual is found to be eligible for unemployment insurance benefits pursuant to New Jersey’s unemployment compensation law (N.J.S.A.43:21-1 et seq.) What is surprising is that non-solicitation and confidentiality restrictions are universally recognized as protecting the legitimate interests of employers.
Being eligible for unemployment benefits as a qualification is not exactly a “high bar” as New Jersey is considered one of the most liberal, give-away states when it comes to unemployment eligibility determinations. The bill does stipulate that the provisions of the bill will not apply to any covenant, contract, or agreement in effect on or before the date of the bill’s enactment. This will have only a limited duration as a qualification, however.
Although it is unclear if this legislation will advance, it appears to have some support in both the Assembly and the Senate. Therefore, New Jersey companies should keep it on their radar. Since the bill would not apply retroactively, it may be necessary to execute agreements in advance of the law’s effective date. Even better, employers should contact their legislative representatives and let them know that they oppose this change.
If you have any questions about the proposed legislation or how it may impact your operations, please contact me, Gary Young, or the Scarinci Hollenbeck attorney with whom you work.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!
