
Dan Brecher
Counsel
212-286-0747 dbrecher@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Dan Brecher
Date: September 3, 2013
Counsel
212-286-0747 dbrecher@sh-law.comWhile Donald Trump is well known for his antics on the air and in the boardroom, he may soon be spending some time inside a courtroom. New York Attorney General Eric T. Schneiderman recently announced that his office filed a $40 million fraud lawsuit against Trump and his business education venture, The Trump Entrepreneur Institute.
According to the suit, The Trump Entrepreneur Institute, formerly known as Trump University LLC, operated as an unlicensed educational institute from 2005 to 2011 in violation of New York education law. While State Education Department officials allegedly informed Trump, in 2005, that his school lacked the proper license and failed to meet the legal definitions of a university, Trump did not change its name until 2010.
The suit also alleges that Trump University reinforced the misperception that it was a “real university” by employing the signs, symbols, and terminology used by traditional colleges and universities. For instance, payments were referred to as “tuition,” instructors were called “faculty,” and completing course work resulted in “graduation.”
The complaint also alleges that Trump University misled students through its marketing and advertising campaigns. False claims cited in the lawsuit include that instructors were “handpicked” by Donald Trump; students would be taught Donald Trump’s very own real estate strategies and techniques; students would learn “everything [they] need[ed] to know” to become successful real estate investors; and students would receive access to private sources of financing. The complaint also maintains that instructors used free or low cost seminars to pitch consumers to enroll in increasingly expensive programs, including Trump Elite mentorship programs costing $10,000 to $35,000.
“Mr. Trump used his celebrity status and personally appeared in commercials making false promises to convince people to spend tens of thousands of dollars they couldn’t afford for lessons they never got,” Schneiderman said in a press release.
The lawsuit seeks full restitution on behalf of more than 5,000 consumers who signed up for the classes, disgorgement of profits, as well as costs, penalties and injunctive relief prohibiting deceptive acts and practices going forward.
Not surprisingly, Trump responded by sharply criticizing the allegations and Attorney General Schneiderman personally. He characterized the suit as baseless, citing the university’s 98 percent satisfaction rate. He also alleged that Schneiderman’s actions are politically motivated.
Whether or not that occurred here, the lesson is that businesses need to be aware of, and timely compliant with, their licensure requirements and to make sure that their promotional statements are not demonstrably false.
If you have any questions about this case or would like to discuss the legal issues involved, please contact me, Dan Brecher, or the Scarinci Hollenbeck attorney with whom you work.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Your home is likely your greatest asset, which is why it is so important to adequately protect it. Homeowners insurance protects you from the financial costs of unforeseen losses, such as theft, fire, and natural disasters, by helping you rebuild and replace possessions that were lost While the definition of “adequate” coverage depends upon a […]
Author: Jesse M. Dimitro
Making a non-contingent offer can dramatically increase your chances of securing a real estate transaction, particularly in competitive markets like New York City. However, buyers should understand that waiving contingencies, including those related to financing, or appraisals, also comes with significant risks. Determining your best strategy requires careful analysis of the property, the market, and […]
Author: Jesse M. Dimitro
Business Transactional Attorney Zemel to Spearhead Strategic Initiatives for Continued Growth and Innovation Little Falls, NJ – February 21, 2025 – Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC is pleased to announce that Partner Fred D. Zemel has been named Chair of the firm’s Strategic Planning Committee. In this role, Mr. Zemel will lead the committee in identifying, […]
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Big changes sometimes occur during the life cycle of a contract. Cancelling a contract outright can be bad for your reputation and your bottom line. Businesses need to know how to best address a change in circumstances, while also protecting their legal rights. One option is to transfer the “benefits and the burdens” of a […]
Author: Dan Brecher
What is a trade secret and why you you protect them? Technology has made trade secret theft even easier and more prevalent. In fact, businesses lose billions of dollars every year due to trade secret theft committed by employees, competitors, and even foreign governments. But what is a trade secret? And how do you protect […]
Author: Ronald S. Bienstock
If you are considering the purchase of a property, you may wonder — what is title insurance, do I need it, and why do I need it? Even seasoned property owners may question if the added expense and extra paperwork is really necessary, especially considering that people and entities insured by title insurance make fewer […]
Author: Patrick T. Conlon
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
While Donald Trump is well known for his antics on the air and in the boardroom, he may soon be spending some time inside a courtroom. New York Attorney General Eric T. Schneiderman recently announced that his office filed a $40 million fraud lawsuit against Trump and his business education venture, The Trump Entrepreneur Institute.
According to the suit, The Trump Entrepreneur Institute, formerly known as Trump University LLC, operated as an unlicensed educational institute from 2005 to 2011 in violation of New York education law. While State Education Department officials allegedly informed Trump, in 2005, that his school lacked the proper license and failed to meet the legal definitions of a university, Trump did not change its name until 2010.
The suit also alleges that Trump University reinforced the misperception that it was a “real university” by employing the signs, symbols, and terminology used by traditional colleges and universities. For instance, payments were referred to as “tuition,” instructors were called “faculty,” and completing course work resulted in “graduation.”
The complaint also alleges that Trump University misled students through its marketing and advertising campaigns. False claims cited in the lawsuit include that instructors were “handpicked” by Donald Trump; students would be taught Donald Trump’s very own real estate strategies and techniques; students would learn “everything [they] need[ed] to know” to become successful real estate investors; and students would receive access to private sources of financing. The complaint also maintains that instructors used free or low cost seminars to pitch consumers to enroll in increasingly expensive programs, including Trump Elite mentorship programs costing $10,000 to $35,000.
“Mr. Trump used his celebrity status and personally appeared in commercials making false promises to convince people to spend tens of thousands of dollars they couldn’t afford for lessons they never got,” Schneiderman said in a press release.
The lawsuit seeks full restitution on behalf of more than 5,000 consumers who signed up for the classes, disgorgement of profits, as well as costs, penalties and injunctive relief prohibiting deceptive acts and practices going forward.
Not surprisingly, Trump responded by sharply criticizing the allegations and Attorney General Schneiderman personally. He characterized the suit as baseless, citing the university’s 98 percent satisfaction rate. He also alleged that Schneiderman’s actions are politically motivated.
Whether or not that occurred here, the lesson is that businesses need to be aware of, and timely compliant with, their licensure requirements and to make sure that their promotional statements are not demonstrably false.
If you have any questions about this case or would like to discuss the legal issues involved, please contact me, Dan Brecher, or the Scarinci Hollenbeck attorney with whom you work.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!