
Joel R. Glucksman
Partner
201-896-7095 jglucksman@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Joel R. Glucksman
Date: October 6, 2015

Partner
201-896-7095 jglucksman@sh-law.comOptim Energy LLC announced on Aug. 13 that the company had agreed to pay Walnut Creek Mining, the energy branch of private equity giant Blackstone Group, $5 million to settle their legal battle. According to a Wall Street Journal report, the Blackstone Group will reportedly drop its $190 million appeal of Optim’s court-approved restructuring plan as part of the new agreement.
Optim, a power plant operator, filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection on Feb. 12, 2014 due to a collapse in electricity prices. The resulting 40 percent drop in prices hindered Optim’s ability to fulfill its debt repayments to Blackstone and various primary and lower-ranking creditors. Optim’s debt accumulated after it received a loan from Blackstone for the construction of a power plant and the acquisition of a facility in Texas.
Walnut Creek Mining claimed that Optim’s restructuring plan was inadequate because the firm only stood to recover one percent of the debt total. Blackstone had been pursuing a $190 million claim against Optim for rejection damages from a fuel supply agreement in the previously approved plan.
One of the main issues presented in Blackstone’s appeal was that after the firm bid $126 million to acquire an Optim power plant, a price that doubled all other offers, Optim expected the firm to bid on its two other plants. However, Optim claimed that Blackstone was using Walnut Creek Mining, which supplied fuel to Optim’s power plants, to undermine its operations as a way to drive down the company’s bidding price for the plants at the bankruptcy auction.
In court documents, the new plan will allow Optim to avoid making repayments on the full $713 million debt total to secured creditors. Optim officials claimed that this agreement will halt litigation with Blackstone, according to the Wall Street Journal. In turn, the deal will also stop litigation with unsecured creditors as the company agreed to distribute a portion of the power plant sales proceeds to these lower-ranking creditors. Further, unsecured creditors will now recover 95 cents on the dollar as opposed to 75 cents, as stated in the previous bankruptcy plan.
Blackstone officials stated in court papers that the appeal will not be officially dropped until the liquidation plan for Optim’s six other bankrupt entities is approved by the court.
Are you a creditor in a bankruptcy? Have you been sued by a bankrupt? If you have any questions about your rights, please contact me, Joel Glucksman, at 201-806-3364.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

IP infringement occurs when someone uses your intellectual property without your permission or beyond the scope of the permission you granted. Common examples of IP infringement include copying a product’s patented features or using a trademarked logo in a way that is likely to confuse consumers about the source or affiliation of goods or services. […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki

When facing public allegations of wrongdoing, companies should not let the speed of the public conversation dictate the speed of an investigation. An investigation designed to confirm a preferred narrative rather than establish the facts can create serious problems later, particularly if litigation, regulatory scrutiny, or employment claims follow. Key Takeaways When public allegations surface […]
Author: Sean M. Pena

For battery energy storage system (BESS) developers, securing equipment and site control is only part of the development equation. A project must also connect to the electric grid, and increasingly, BESS interconnection is one of the biggest sources of schedule, cost, and contractual risk. Key Takeaways This article is Part 3 of our Battery Storage […]
Author: Nicholas Wall

Director and officer liability increases sharply when a company is in financial distress. Decisions that would draw little attention in a healthy business can later be challenged by creditors, shareholders, bankruptcy trustees, and regulators as breaches of fiduciary duty, fraudulent transfers, or oversight failures. Understanding where that exposure comes from, and how to manage it, […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki

For developers pursuing battery energy storage system (BESS) projects, finding the right property is only the beginning. BESS site selection is as much a legal and transactional exercise as a real estate decision, with risk analysis central to the project’s ultimate success. Key Takeaways The core questions for BESS site selection in New York and […]
Author: Nicholas Wall

What should you expect when meeting a litigation attorney about a business dispute? You should expect to describe the dispute in your own words, hand over the most important documents, flag any deadlines or immediate threats, and leave with a clearer picture of the problem, what information is still needed, and the likely next steps. […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!