
Joel R. Glucksman
Partner
201-896-7095 jglucksman@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Joel R. Glucksman
Date: October 6, 2015

Partner
201-896-7095 jglucksman@sh-law.comOptim Energy LLC announced on Aug. 13 that the company had agreed to pay Walnut Creek Mining, the energy branch of private equity giant Blackstone Group, $5 million to settle their legal battle. According to a Wall Street Journal report, the Blackstone Group will reportedly drop its $190 million appeal of Optim’s court-approved restructuring plan as part of the new agreement.
Optim, a power plant operator, filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection on Feb. 12, 2014 due to a collapse in electricity prices. The resulting 40 percent drop in prices hindered Optim’s ability to fulfill its debt repayments to Blackstone and various primary and lower-ranking creditors. Optim’s debt accumulated after it received a loan from Blackstone for the construction of a power plant and the acquisition of a facility in Texas.
Walnut Creek Mining claimed that Optim’s restructuring plan was inadequate because the firm only stood to recover one percent of the debt total. Blackstone had been pursuing a $190 million claim against Optim for rejection damages from a fuel supply agreement in the previously approved plan.
One of the main issues presented in Blackstone’s appeal was that after the firm bid $126 million to acquire an Optim power plant, a price that doubled all other offers, Optim expected the firm to bid on its two other plants. However, Optim claimed that Blackstone was using Walnut Creek Mining, which supplied fuel to Optim’s power plants, to undermine its operations as a way to drive down the company’s bidding price for the plants at the bankruptcy auction.
In court documents, the new plan will allow Optim to avoid making repayments on the full $713 million debt total to secured creditors. Optim officials claimed that this agreement will halt litigation with Blackstone, according to the Wall Street Journal. In turn, the deal will also stop litigation with unsecured creditors as the company agreed to distribute a portion of the power plant sales proceeds to these lower-ranking creditors. Further, unsecured creditors will now recover 95 cents on the dollar as opposed to 75 cents, as stated in the previous bankruptcy plan.
Blackstone officials stated in court papers that the appeal will not be officially dropped until the liquidation plan for Optim’s six other bankrupt entities is approved by the court.
Are you a creditor in a bankruptcy? Have you been sued by a bankrupt? If you have any questions about your rights, please contact me, Joel Glucksman, at 201-806-3364.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Bringing on outside investors can provide the capital and strategic support a business needs to grow. However, raising capital also introduces important legal, financial, and operational considerations. Before bringing on investors, businesses should address key legal issues to reduce risk, streamline investor due diligence, and position the company for long-term success. Early preparation signals that […]
Author: Dan Brecher

How the Updated Law Shapes Retirement and Estate Planning The SECURE 2.0 Act of 2022 materially reshapes the required minimum distribution (RMD) landscape, extending tax deferral opportunities while accelerating distribution requirements for many beneficiaries. For high-net-worth individuals and families, these changes are not merely technical. They require a reassessment of retirement income strategies, beneficiary planning, […]
Author: Marc J. Comer

Small businesses considering buying commercial property in New Jersey must evaluate a range of legal, financial, and operational factors. While ownership can offer long-term value and control, it also introduces significant risks if not properly structured. This guide outlines key considerations to help New Jersey business owners make informed decisions, minimize legal exposure, and successfully […]
Author: Robert L. Baker, Jr.

On January 28, 2026, staff of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission’s Divisions of Corporation Finance, Investment Management, and Trading and Markets issued a joint statement clarifying how existing federal securities laws apply to tokenized securities. The SEC’s “Statement on Tokenized Securities” does not establish new law, but it does provide greater clarity on the […]
Author: Dan Brecher

Operating a business in the New Jersey and New York City metropolitan region offers incredible opportunities, but it also requires navigating a dense and highly regulated legal environment. From entity formation to regulatory compliance, seemingly minor legal oversights can expose business owners to significant risk. In our work with businesses throughout the region, our attorneys […]
Author: Dan Brecher

High-profile founder litigation is more than just a media spectacle. For startup founders, these cases underscore the legal and structural risks that can arise when rapid growth outpaces formal oversight. While launching a new company can be both an exciting and deeply rewarding endeavor, founders must be mindful that it also comes with significant risks. […]
Author: Dan Brecher
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!