Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Date: January 3, 2013
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comNew York and New Jersey businesses that contract with the federal government should consider boosting compliance efforts related to the False Claims Ac. A new report suggests that running afoul of the FCA can be extremely costly.
In broad terms, the FCA imposes liability on any person who knowingly submits a false claim to the government or knowingly makes a false record or statement to get a false claim paid by the government. The FCA also imposes liability when false claims or statements are used to avoid having to pay money to the federal government. The law also contains qui tam provisions, which allow private persons to file suit for violations of the FCA on behalf of the government.
Although the FCA has been around since 1863, the government has recently stepped up enforcement and penalties. The Department of Justice recently announced that it secured $4.9 billion in settlements and judgments in civil cases under the FCA in the fiscal year ending Sept. 30, 2012. According to the DOJ, “This figure constitutes a record recovery for a single year, eclipsing the previous record by more than $1.7 billion, and brings total recoveries under the False Claims Act since January 2009 to $13.3 billion – which is the largest four-year total in the Justice Department’s history and more than a third of total recoveries since the act was amended 26 years ago in 1986.”
The DOJ report shows that whistleblower claims also reached record levels. A total of 647 qui tam suits were filed last fiscal year, resulting in the recovery of a record $3.3 billion. FCA liability was also concentrated in the health care and mortgage industries, both of which have been targeted by the Obama Administration’s anti-fraud efforts. With regard to health care fraud, recoveries exceeded $3 billion for the first time in a single fiscal year. Housing and mortgage fraud accounted for a record $1.4 billion.
The report signals that New York and New Jersey businesses, particularly those in the targeted industries, should conduct a thorough review of their FCA compliance activities. In addition, all companies contracting with the federal government should also make sure that they have procedures in place to properly handle whistleblower complaints before they result in costly qui tam lawsuits.
If you have any questions about the DOJ report or would like to discuss your company’s FCA compliance activities, please contact me, Jay Surgent, or the Scarinci Hollenbeck attorney with whom you work.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

IP infringement occurs when someone uses your intellectual property without your permission or beyond the scope of the permission you granted. Common examples of IP infringement include copying a product’s patented features or using a trademarked logo in a way that is likely to confuse consumers about the source or affiliation of goods or services. […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki

When facing public allegations of wrongdoing, companies should not let the speed of the public conversation dictate the speed of an investigation. An investigation designed to confirm a preferred narrative rather than establish the facts can create serious problems later, particularly if litigation, regulatory scrutiny, or employment claims follow. Key Takeaways When public allegations surface […]
Author: Sean M. Pena

For battery energy storage system (BESS) developers, securing equipment and site control is only part of the development equation. A project must also connect to the electric grid, and increasingly, BESS interconnection is one of the biggest sources of schedule, cost, and contractual risk. Key Takeaways This article is Part 3 of our Battery Storage […]
Author: Nicholas Wall

Director and officer liability increases sharply when a company is in financial distress. Decisions that would draw little attention in a healthy business can later be challenged by creditors, shareholders, bankruptcy trustees, and regulators as breaches of fiduciary duty, fraudulent transfers, or oversight failures. Understanding where that exposure comes from, and how to manage it, […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki

For developers pursuing battery energy storage system (BESS) projects, finding the right property is only the beginning. BESS site selection is as much a legal and transactional exercise as a real estate decision, with risk analysis central to the project’s ultimate success. Key Takeaways The core questions for BESS site selection in New York and […]
Author: Nicholas Wall

What should you expect when meeting a litigation attorney about a business dispute? You should expect to describe the dispute in your own words, hand over the most important documents, flag any deadlines or immediate threats, and leave with a clearer picture of the problem, what information is still needed, and the likely next steps. […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!