Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Date: May 25, 2013
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comMost of these appeals have merit. However, be mindful of the fact that a municipality has the right to file a counterclaim. Also, under certain circumstances, a municipality can argue for an increase in the assessment even without having filed a counterclaim.

In a recent decision, South Brunswick Twp. v. Princeton Orchards Assocs. LLC, the town went a step further and filed its own petition of appeal, asserting that the assessor’s valuation of the property was too low. At the same time, the property owner filed a direct appeal in the Tax Court seeking a reduction of the assessment. The town failed to file a timely counterclaim to challenge the property owner’s direct case. On motion by the property owner, the town’s late filed counterclaim was dismissed. When the town lost its petition at the County Tax Board, it filed an appeal to the Tax Court. The property owner asserted that two separate cases cannot be maintained and that the town’s appeal must be dismissed. Moreover, because the town had not timely filed a counterclaim in the property owner’s direct case, the property owner argued that the town was barred from arguing for an increase in assessment in defense of the property owner’s direct case.
The Tax Court disagreed and found that although the filing of a Complaint grants to the Tax Court overall jurisdiction as to all matters, the late filing of a counterclaim should not bar the timely filing of an appeal by the town from an adverse County Board ruling. As a result, there are two cases filed for the exact same property by opposing parties which will now in all likelihood be consolidated into one action.
The result of this case highlights the fact that towns have the right to challenge an assessment just as much as property owners. It serves to caution the practitioner not to file complaints with indifference to the town’s rights and without doing your homework. Filing an appeal without proper analysis beforehand just might result in an increase to your client’s assessment- not the result for which you were hired.
Mark K. Follender is a Partner at Scarinci Hollenbeck and chair of the firm’s Real Property Tax Appeals Group, which represents private commercial property owners and municipalities throughout the State of New Jersey. Feel free to contact Mark Follender, if you would like to discuss your property tax appeal options or have questions about the article above.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Compliance programs are no longer judged by how they look on paper, but by how they function in the real world. Compliance monitoring is the ongoing process of reviewing, testing, and evaluating whether policies, procedures, and controls are being followed—and whether they are actually working. What Is Compliance Monitoring? In today’s heightened regulatory environment, compliance […]
Author: Dan Brecher

New Jersey personal guaranty liability is a critical issue for business owners who regularly sign contracts on behalf of their companies. A recent New Jersey Supreme Court decision provides valuable guidance on when a business owner can be held personally responsible for a company’s debt. Under the Court’s decision in Extech Building Materials, Inc. v. […]
Author: Charles H. Friedrich

Commercial real estate trends in 2026 are being shaped by shifting economic conditions, technological innovation, and evolving tenant demands. As the market adjusts to changing interest rates, capital flows, and workplace models, investors, owners, tenants, and developers must understand how these trends are influencing opportunities and risk in the year ahead. Overall Outlook for Commercial […]
Author: Michael J. Willner

Part 2 – Tips Excluded from Income Certain employees and independent contractors may be eligible to deduct tips from their income for tax years 2025 through 2028 under provisions included in the One Big Beautiful Bill. The deduction is capped at $25,000 per year and begins to phase out at $150,000 of modified adjusted gross […]
Author: Scott H. Novak

Part 1 – Overtime Pay and Income Tax Treatment Overview This Firm Insights post summarizes one provision of the “One Big Beautiful Bill” related to the tax treatment of overtime compensation and related employer wage reporting obligations. Overtime Pay and Employee Tax Treatment The Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) generally requires that overtime be paid […]
Author: Scott H. Novak

In 2025, New York enacted one of the most consequential updates to its consumer protection framework in decades. The Fostering Affordability and Integrity through Reasonable Business Practices Act (FAIR Act) significantly expands the scope and strength of New York’s long-standing consumer protection statute, General Business Law § 349, and alters the compliance landscape for New York […]
Author: Dan Brecher
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!