
Joel R. Glucksman
Partner
201-896-7095 jglucksman@sh-law.com
Partner
201-896-7095 jglucksman@sh-law.comAccording to USA Today, this decision will likely spark a “fierce legal battle” as it may put Puerto Rico’s citizens, creditors and workers in jeopardy.

After years of talking with bondholders and insurers, Puerto Rico is making this move in an effort to eliminate nearly $70 billion in debt. According to Bloomberg Markets, this will be the biggest debt restructuring process ever undertaken by a U.S. governmental entity.
“We reached this decision because it protects the best interests of the people of Puerto Rico,” Governor Richard Rossello said in a statement.
While the mayor believes this is the best move for Puerto Rico to make, Brad Setser, senior fellow at the Council on Foreign Relations, addressed that it may cause an uproar.
“An orderly process for working out Puerto Rico’s debt trouble provides the best hope for Puerto Rico and also the best chance for most creditors to emerge better off,” he told Bloomberg in a telephone interview. “But clearly there’s going to be fights between different groups of creditors.”
Because Puerto Rico is a U.S. territory, it is restricted from using traditional bankruptcy. According to Fox News, the case was instead filed under Title III of the PROMESA law. This process utilizes a debt restructuring plan that is similar to that of bankruptcy protection. With this process, a creditor cannot seize any of Puerto Rico’s assets without confirmed authorization provided by the control board. Additionally, this process gives Puerto Rico the ability to force discounts on credit recoveries. This could work in its favor, but it can also scare potential investors away, ultimately prolonging the suffering.
“The governor needed to show that his primary allegiance lies with the citizens of Puerto Rico, and that was the justification for the filing,” David Tawil, president of Maglan Capital told Fox News. “I’m not sure whether bondholders are going to get any better treatment or recovery under this course of action.”
Unlike most bankruptcy cases, this process will not be controlled by a bankruptcy judge. On Friday May 5, Chief Justice John Roberts of the United States Supreme Court appointed District Court Judge Laura Taylor Swain of the Southern District of New York to handle the Puerto Rico restructuring. She is a judge with significant experience in overseeing bankruptcy and financial crime cases.
Currently, the citizens of Puerto Rico are leaving the island and heading to the States at an alarming rate. According to CNN Money, the island’s total population has dropped by 350,000 since 2007, and this trend of decline is likely to keep up.
When it comes to the unsecured bondholders of Puerto Rico, they may “suffer significant cuts,” according to USA Today. The major investors are upset because they’re claiming that they made the investments before the island was even eligible for bankruptcy. This may cause conflict, and some believe that lawsuits are bound to surface.
However, Ted Hampton, vice president of Moody’s Investor Service, stated that the governor’s decision to file for bankruptcy was a step in the right direction. He believes that requesting bankruptcy protection will streamline the process for creditors, instead of creating a chaotic period that enables parties to form lawsuits.
Is there a chance that Puerto Rico could sell off some of its assets to pay off the debt? Yes, but it’s not likely. For example, USA Today brought up Detroit’s $18 billion debt, and how the city negotiated a deal and collected money from the state of Michigan and other private donors for relief.
Unfortunately, Puerto Rico is under much larger-scaled debt and scrutiny. This could make it difficult for the island to make a similar deal. Additionally, it’s not clear how long the court proceeding would last. It seems as though having the court oversee the island’s debt restructuring is its only choice.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

IP infringement occurs when someone uses your intellectual property without your permission or beyond the scope of the permission you granted. Common examples of IP infringement include copying a product’s patented features or using a trademarked logo in a way that is likely to confuse consumers about the source or affiliation of goods or services. […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki

When facing public allegations of wrongdoing, companies should not let the speed of the public conversation dictate the speed of an investigation. An investigation designed to confirm a preferred narrative rather than establish the facts can create serious problems later, particularly if litigation, regulatory scrutiny, or employment claims follow. Key Takeaways When public allegations surface […]
Author: Sean M. Pena

For battery energy storage system (BESS) developers, securing equipment and site control is only part of the development equation. A project must also connect to the electric grid, and increasingly, BESS interconnection is one of the biggest sources of schedule, cost, and contractual risk. Key Takeaways This article is Part 3 of our Battery Storage […]
Author: Nicholas Wall

Director and officer liability increases sharply when a company is in financial distress. Decisions that would draw little attention in a healthy business can later be challenged by creditors, shareholders, bankruptcy trustees, and regulators as breaches of fiduciary duty, fraudulent transfers, or oversight failures. Understanding where that exposure comes from, and how to manage it, […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki

For developers pursuing battery energy storage system (BESS) projects, finding the right property is only the beginning. BESS site selection is as much a legal and transactional exercise as a real estate decision, with risk analysis central to the project’s ultimate success. Key Takeaways The core questions for BESS site selection in New York and […]
Author: Nicholas Wall

What should you expect when meeting a litigation attorney about a business dispute? You should expect to describe the dispute in your own words, hand over the most important documents, flag any deadlines or immediate threats, and leave with a clearer picture of the problem, what information is still needed, and the likely next steps. […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!