James F. McDonough
Of Counsel
732-568-8360 jmcdonough@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Report Shows How Much Walgreens Stands To Gain with Inversion
Author: James F. McDonough
Date: June 18, 2014
Key Contacts
Back
Walgreens is just one of many U.S. companies to consider lowering its tax bill by moving abroad. This move, called an “inversion,” involves purchasing a foreign company and using it to alter the corporate structure so that the U.S. company is technically a corporate resident of the low-tax foreign country.
Walgreens has been considering the move since April, under pressure from shareholders such as Stefano Pessina, who is Walgreens’ largest shareholder and the executive chairman of Alliance Boots, the company with which it would merge, according to a new report from Americans for Tax Fairness.
A Walgreens inversion would cost the U.S. more than $4 billion over the course of five years in lost tax revenue, the report found. At the same time, the company would continue to receive significant benefit from U.S. taxpayers. Approximately $16.7 billion of Walgreens’ $72 billion in 2013 sales came from Medicare and Medicaid, government-funded healthcare programs.
The report also makes the argument that an inversion might give Walgreens an unfair advantage. Between 2008 and 2012, Walgreens paid a U.S. tax rate of 31 percent – close to the official tax rate of 35 percent. During the same period, competitor CVS Caremark paid an effective tax rate of 34 percent, and is currently not making an effort to move offshore. If Walgreens were to complete an inversion, its tax rate would sink to about 20 percent, which could give it an unfair advantage over competitors, or force them to make the same move.
Some shareholders oppose the move, including CtW Investment Group, which owns less than 1 percent of the company’s shares, according to The New York Times. The group sent a letter to Walgreens’ management explaining its position, citing possible removal from the S&P 500, diminished shareholder protections in Switzerland and reputational risks as reasons not to carry out the inversion.
If you have any questions about this post or would like to discuss your company’s tax,trust, and estate matters , please contact me, James F. McDonough at ScarinciHollenbeck.com.
- Practices: Corporate Tax Planning
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Related Posts
See all
Does Your Homeowners Insurance Provide Adequate Coverage?
Your home is likely your greatest asset, which is why it is so important to adequately protect it. Homeowners insurance protects you from the financial costs of unforeseen losses, such as theft, fire, and natural disasters, by helping you rebuild and replace possessions that were lost While the definition of “adequate” coverage depends upon a […]
Author: Jesse M. Dimitro
Understanding the Importance of a Non-Contingent Offer
Making a non-contingent offer can dramatically increase your chances of securing a real estate transaction, particularly in competitive markets like New York City. However, buyers should understand that waiving contingencies, including those related to financing, or appraisals, also comes with significant risks. Determining your best strategy requires careful analysis of the property, the market, and […]
Author: Jesse M. Dimitro
Fred D. Zemel Appointed Chair of Strategic Planning at Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC
Business Transactional Attorney Zemel to Spearhead Strategic Initiatives for Continued Growth and Innovation Little Falls, NJ – February 21, 2025 – Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC is pleased to announce that Partner Fred D. Zemel has been named Chair of the firm’s Strategic Planning Committee. In this role, Mr. Zemel will lead the committee in identifying, […]
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Novation Agreement Process: Step-by-Step Guide for Businesses
Big changes sometimes occur during the life cycle of a contract. Cancelling a contract outright can be bad for your reputation and your bottom line. Businesses need to know how to best address a change in circumstances, while also protecting their legal rights. One option is to transfer the “benefits and the burdens” of a […]
Author: Dan Brecher
What Is a Trade Secret? Key Elements and Legal Protections Explained
What is a trade secret and why you you protect them? Technology has made trade secret theft even easier and more prevalent. In fact, businesses lose billions of dollars every year due to trade secret theft committed by employees, competitors, and even foreign governments. But what is a trade secret? And how do you protect […]
Author: Ronald S. Bienstock
What Is Title Insurance? Safeguarding Against Title Defects
If you are considering the purchase of a property, you may wonder — what is title insurance, do I need it, and why do I need it? Even seasoned property owners may question if the added expense and extra paperwork is really necessary, especially considering that people and entities insured by title insurance make fewer […]
Author: Patrick T. Conlon
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Report Shows How Much Walgreens Stands To Gain with Inversion
Author: James F. McDonough
Walgreens is just one of many U.S. companies to consider lowering its tax bill by moving abroad. This move, called an “inversion,” involves purchasing a foreign company and using it to alter the corporate structure so that the U.S. company is technically a corporate resident of the low-tax foreign country.
Walgreens has been considering the move since April, under pressure from shareholders such as Stefano Pessina, who is Walgreens’ largest shareholder and the executive chairman of Alliance Boots, the company with which it would merge, according to a new report from Americans for Tax Fairness.
A Walgreens inversion would cost the U.S. more than $4 billion over the course of five years in lost tax revenue, the report found. At the same time, the company would continue to receive significant benefit from U.S. taxpayers. Approximately $16.7 billion of Walgreens’ $72 billion in 2013 sales came from Medicare and Medicaid, government-funded healthcare programs.
The report also makes the argument that an inversion might give Walgreens an unfair advantage. Between 2008 and 2012, Walgreens paid a U.S. tax rate of 31 percent – close to the official tax rate of 35 percent. During the same period, competitor CVS Caremark paid an effective tax rate of 34 percent, and is currently not making an effort to move offshore. If Walgreens were to complete an inversion, its tax rate would sink to about 20 percent, which could give it an unfair advantage over competitors, or force them to make the same move.
Some shareholders oppose the move, including CtW Investment Group, which owns less than 1 percent of the company’s shares, according to The New York Times. The group sent a letter to Walgreens’ management explaining its position, citing possible removal from the S&P 500, diminished shareholder protections in Switzerland and reputational risks as reasons not to carry out the inversion.
If you have any questions about this post or would like to discuss your company’s tax,trust, and estate matters , please contact me, James F. McDonough at ScarinciHollenbeck.com.