Joel R. Glucksman
Partner
201-896-7095 jglucksman@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Judge Rules Against ResCap Noteholders, Denounces Legal Tactics
Author: Joel R. Glucksman
Date: November 29, 2013
Key Contacts
Back
A U.S. bankruptcy judge ruled this week that a group of ResCap noteholders are not entitled to interest that has accrued on their claims since the mortgage servicer filed for bankruptcy protection last year.
U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Martin Glenn denied claims made by junior secured noteholders for at least $350 million in post-petition interest. Glenn ruled that the collateral backing $2.2 billion in debt held by the junior secured noteholders was only worth $1.9 billion. Therefore, since their claims are undersecured, the noteholders aren’t entitled to post-petition interest, Bloomberg reported.
The court’s ruling comes ahead of next week’s hearing on ResCap’s plan to exit bankruptcy. Under the company’s proposed plan, it would pay the noteholders all of their principal and normal interest that accrued before the case was filed last year. In his 119-page ruling, Judge Glenn denounced the noteholders’ legal tactics as “unfortunate,” as they were essentially the only creditors opposing ResCap’s plan to exit bankruptcy proceedings. He also added that during the entire course of bankruptcy proceedings, the noteholders have pursued a “strategy where they contest everything and concede nothing (even when the court has questioned whether they are acting in good faith).”
“It should not be lost on anyone that the [noteholders] stand virtually alone in this case in failing to reach a consensual agreement to resolve their issues,” Judge Glenn wrote, according to Dow Jones Business News. “The result has been protracted proceedings that have burdened the estate and reduced funds available to satisfy creditor claims. That is unfortunate.”
ResCap, a subsidiary of Ally Financial, filed for protection under Chapter 11 of the bankruptcy law in May 2012 as litigation over bad mortgage securities grew. Over the course of the proceedings, the company reached agreements to sell mortgage-servicing platforms and loan portfolios through a series of bankruptcy auctions that generated $4.5 billion in proceeds.
- Practices: Bankruptcy & Creditors' Rights
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Related Posts
See all
Does Your Homeowners Insurance Provide Adequate Coverage?
Your home is likely your greatest asset, which is why it is so important to adequately protect it. Homeowners insurance protects you from the financial costs of unforeseen losses, such as theft, fire, and natural disasters, by helping you rebuild and replace possessions that were lost While the definition of “adequate” coverage depends upon a […]
Author: Jesse M. Dimitro
Understanding the Importance of a Non-Contingent Offer
Making a non-contingent offer can dramatically increase your chances of securing a real estate transaction, particularly in competitive markets like New York City. However, buyers should understand that waiving contingencies, including those related to financing, or appraisals, also comes with significant risks. Determining your best strategy requires careful analysis of the property, the market, and […]
Author: Jesse M. Dimitro
Fred D. Zemel Appointed Chair of Strategic Planning at Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC
Business Transactional Attorney Zemel to Spearhead Strategic Initiatives for Continued Growth and Innovation Little Falls, NJ – February 21, 2025 – Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC is pleased to announce that Partner Fred D. Zemel has been named Chair of the firm’s Strategic Planning Committee. In this role, Mr. Zemel will lead the committee in identifying, […]
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Novation Agreement Process: Step-by-Step Guide for Businesses
Big changes sometimes occur during the life cycle of a contract. Cancelling a contract outright can be bad for your reputation and your bottom line. Businesses need to know how to best address a change in circumstances, while also protecting their legal rights. One option is to transfer the “benefits and the burdens” of a […]
Author: Dan Brecher
What Is a Trade Secret? Key Elements and Legal Protections Explained
What is a trade secret and why you you protect them? Technology has made trade secret theft even easier and more prevalent. In fact, businesses lose billions of dollars every year due to trade secret theft committed by employees, competitors, and even foreign governments. But what is a trade secret? And how do you protect […]
Author: Ronald S. Bienstock
What Is Title Insurance? Safeguarding Against Title Defects
If you are considering the purchase of a property, you may wonder — what is title insurance, do I need it, and why do I need it? Even seasoned property owners may question if the added expense and extra paperwork is really necessary, especially considering that people and entities insured by title insurance make fewer […]
Author: Patrick T. Conlon
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Judge Rules Against ResCap Noteholders, Denounces Legal Tactics
Author: Joel R. Glucksman
A U.S. bankruptcy judge ruled this week that a group of ResCap noteholders are not entitled to interest that has accrued on their claims since the mortgage servicer filed for bankruptcy protection last year.
U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Martin Glenn denied claims made by junior secured noteholders for at least $350 million in post-petition interest. Glenn ruled that the collateral backing $2.2 billion in debt held by the junior secured noteholders was only worth $1.9 billion. Therefore, since their claims are undersecured, the noteholders aren’t entitled to post-petition interest, Bloomberg reported.
The court’s ruling comes ahead of next week’s hearing on ResCap’s plan to exit bankruptcy. Under the company’s proposed plan, it would pay the noteholders all of their principal and normal interest that accrued before the case was filed last year. In his 119-page ruling, Judge Glenn denounced the noteholders’ legal tactics as “unfortunate,” as they were essentially the only creditors opposing ResCap’s plan to exit bankruptcy proceedings. He also added that during the entire course of bankruptcy proceedings, the noteholders have pursued a “strategy where they contest everything and concede nothing (even when the court has questioned whether they are acting in good faith).”
“It should not be lost on anyone that the [noteholders] stand virtually alone in this case in failing to reach a consensual agreement to resolve their issues,” Judge Glenn wrote, according to Dow Jones Business News. “The result has been protracted proceedings that have burdened the estate and reduced funds available to satisfy creditor claims. That is unfortunate.”
ResCap, a subsidiary of Ally Financial, filed for protection under Chapter 11 of the bankruptcy law in May 2012 as litigation over bad mortgage securities grew. Over the course of the proceedings, the company reached agreements to sell mortgage-servicing platforms and loan portfolios through a series of bankruptcy auctions that generated $4.5 billion in proceeds.