James F. McDonough
Of Counsel
732-568-8360 jmcdonough@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Court Reverses Ernst & Young Tax Decision
Author: James F. McDonough
Date: January 21, 2013
Key Contacts
Back
Reversal of Tax Decision
Two former Ernst & Young attorneys won a reversal of a tax decision that convicted them of developing illegal tax shelters from 1999 to 2001.
By a 2-1 vote, a panel of the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in New York overturned a decision that convicted Martin Nissenbaum and Richard Shapiro of creating unlawful shelters at the accounting firm to help wealthy individuals evade federal taxes, citing a lack of evidence. However, the court reaffirmed the conviction of Robert Coplan and Brian Vaughn, who were sentenced to 36 and 20 months in prison, respectively. The panel also affirmed the conviction of investment advisor Charles Bolton, but ordered a reduction of his fine.
The defendants were accused of costing the government roughly $2 billion in taxes by helping those individuals with more than $10 million in taxable income create paper losses using fraudulent scenarios, Reuters reports. This enables the losses to be taxed at a capital gains rate, rather than ordinary income rate, the news source added.
The investigation was started shortly after the accounting firm, Ernst & Young, started a new team to develop tax shelters that would target high net-worth individuals, according to The Associated Press.
They were convicted in 2010 for tax law violations, and Nissenbaum and Shapiro were also charged with obstructing the Internal Revenue Service. Ernst & Young was not charged in the case, as lawmakers say they cooperated with authorities.
While tax shelters are legal, the IRS has been focusing heavily on these tax-advantaged strategies as of late in an attempt to detect potential tax evasion and close the growing tax gap. As a result, the federal agency has partnered with many countries and banks to provide more transparency in the account and reporting processes of investors.
- Practices: Tax, Trusts & Estates
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Related Posts
See all
Does Your Homeowners Insurance Provide Adequate Coverage?
Your home is likely your greatest asset, which is why it is so important to adequately protect it. Homeowners insurance protects you from the financial costs of unforeseen losses, such as theft, fire, and natural disasters, by helping you rebuild and replace possessions that were lost While the definition of “adequate” coverage depends upon a […]
Author: Jesse M. Dimitro
Understanding the Importance of a Non-Contingent Offer
Making a non-contingent offer can dramatically increase your chances of securing a real estate transaction, particularly in competitive markets like New York City. However, buyers should understand that waiving contingencies, including those related to financing, or appraisals, also comes with significant risks. Determining your best strategy requires careful analysis of the property, the market, and […]
Author: Jesse M. Dimitro
Fred D. Zemel Appointed Chair of Strategic Planning at Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC
Business Transactional Attorney Zemel to Spearhead Strategic Initiatives for Continued Growth and Innovation Little Falls, NJ – February 21, 2025 – Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC is pleased to announce that Partner Fred D. Zemel has been named Chair of the firm’s Strategic Planning Committee. In this role, Mr. Zemel will lead the committee in identifying, […]
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Novation Agreement Process: Step-by-Step Guide for Businesses
Big changes sometimes occur during the life cycle of a contract. Cancelling a contract outright can be bad for your reputation and your bottom line. Businesses need to know how to best address a change in circumstances, while also protecting their legal rights. One option is to transfer the “benefits and the burdens” of a […]
Author: Dan Brecher
What Is a Trade Secret? Key Elements and Legal Protections Explained
What is a trade secret and why you you protect them? Technology has made trade secret theft even easier and more prevalent. In fact, businesses lose billions of dollars every year due to trade secret theft committed by employees, competitors, and even foreign governments. But what is a trade secret? And how do you protect […]
Author: Ronald S. Bienstock
What Is Title Insurance? Safeguarding Against Title Defects
If you are considering the purchase of a property, you may wonder — what is title insurance, do I need it, and why do I need it? Even seasoned property owners may question if the added expense and extra paperwork is really necessary, especially considering that people and entities insured by title insurance make fewer […]
Author: Patrick T. Conlon
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Court Reverses Ernst & Young Tax Decision
Author: James F. McDonough
Reversal of Tax Decision
Two former Ernst & Young attorneys won a reversal of a tax decision that convicted them of developing illegal tax shelters from 1999 to 2001.
By a 2-1 vote, a panel of the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in New York overturned a decision that convicted Martin Nissenbaum and Richard Shapiro of creating unlawful shelters at the accounting firm to help wealthy individuals evade federal taxes, citing a lack of evidence. However, the court reaffirmed the conviction of Robert Coplan and Brian Vaughn, who were sentenced to 36 and 20 months in prison, respectively. The panel also affirmed the conviction of investment advisor Charles Bolton, but ordered a reduction of his fine.
The defendants were accused of costing the government roughly $2 billion in taxes by helping those individuals with more than $10 million in taxable income create paper losses using fraudulent scenarios, Reuters reports. This enables the losses to be taxed at a capital gains rate, rather than ordinary income rate, the news source added.
The investigation was started shortly after the accounting firm, Ernst & Young, started a new team to develop tax shelters that would target high net-worth individuals, according to The Associated Press.
They were convicted in 2010 for tax law violations, and Nissenbaum and Shapiro were also charged with obstructing the Internal Revenue Service. Ernst & Young was not charged in the case, as lawmakers say they cooperated with authorities.
While tax shelters are legal, the IRS has been focusing heavily on these tax-advantaged strategies as of late in an attempt to detect potential tax evasion and close the growing tax gap. As a result, the federal agency has partnered with many countries and banks to provide more transparency in the account and reporting processes of investors.